Truths about Judaism   © Rae West 2000, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018.   v. 14 Aug 2018 02:20
Studies in the Anthropology of a Genetically-Fanatical Racial Group ...
... Read This to Understand Our World: Invest a Little Time Into Your Whole Future


Other Internet Sites: My Lists of   Hundreds of Jew-Aware websites   vs.   Many 'Joff' sites—Jew-Blind, and Deliberately Jew-Evading, Websites


Jewish Propaganda satire
Contents:—     [Back to big-lies website]

SOME SIGNIFICANT JEW-RELATED HISTORICAL EVENTS in date order - Jews from early times to the present

[ Intro and sources | Ancient World | c 0-400 A.D. | c 400-800 A.D. | Inventions of Christianity and Islam | c 700- | c 1000- | c 1400 - c 1880 Reformation (Luther vs others) | c 1500 - 1650 | c 1500 - c 1800 | 19th Century | Opium Wars | 1871 | 1880s and 1890s Massive emigration | 1900- 'Jews' start subversion | 1913- Federal Reserve and War; US enters | 1917- Jewish Coup in Russia | 1933- NSDAP Election Victory | 1938 | 1939- European War, becomes Second World War after US enters | 1945- | 1960- Years of increasing Jew influence: War, Kennedy murder, LBJ, blacks, immigration, Cold War frauds, 'Holocaust' stories etc | 1997- Public Internet influence begins ]
Notes towards understanding 'Jews' (2013) British Bookshop   [ Specimen with photos of Jewish information control and censorship ]
Freemasons   [ Example of Jews and Freemasons—this example is Neville Nagler who helped draft British anti-white race laws | Links ]
Satire   [ Privatisation and Thatcherism/Reaganism | Money from Wars | Jewish political parties | 'Holocaust' and other frauds | Jewish control of 'education' | Church | White genocide ]

Articles (in three separate files; they are long!):–
'Guide for the Perplexed About Jews' [ Featured links: Jewish Influences on White Beliefs | Jewish Influences on Academic Subjects | EVOLUTION OF JEWS: PARASITES IN CITIES ]
General Interest News Articles on Jews [ New (2017, 2016) | 2012-2015 | More Detailed Overview of the Articles ]
Jewish-Affected Subjects in Depth: Advanced Courses on Jews, & Jewish-Awareness Suggestions [ Practical, Applied, Theory-Free Jew Teaching for Everyone | Race | Religion | Philosophy | History of Ideas ... History of Silly Ideas | Sociology | Organisations: Unions, Political Groups, Govt Departments, New Organisations | Populations | Geography | Finance ... of White genocide | Media Studies | BBC | Books | Film | Critics | Education | Jewish Exam Paper | Science | Scientific Method | Medicine, Nutrition | Health vs Harm Studies | Agriculture | History | International History ... the 'Third World' | Classics | Local History | Economic History | Psychology | Anthropology | Evolution ... of White Races | Engineering | Math and Mathematical Models | Women's Studies, Feminism | Economics | Business | Military | Military History | Military Intelligence | Weapon Distribution | Art | Housing | Politics | Law & International Law | Peace Studies | Statistics | Crimes, Policing | Jewish Marxism | Jew Awareness | Civilisations / Futurology of Jews | Talmud notes ]

Cans of Worms: Discovering the True Past. How Historical Revisionism Progresses
And includes: David Bryant on Mensa | on Haavara Agreement | A few Samples of Jewish revisionism since 1945 | History as replacement of old memes by new | Routes to Revisionism | Comparative Revisionism | Final Triumph of Revisionism ]
Endnote from Helen Thomas in The Occidental Observer

[ Back to big-lies website ]


[ Truths about Judaism: Top of Page | Guide for the Politically Perplexed | Jewish articles 2012-2016 | 'Real Jewish Studies' by subjects | March of Revisionism ]

This chronology includes individuals who spoke, wrote, and published on Jews. Many of these were censored and suppressed, and are not well-known.

Here are just three websites of revisionism, each trying to identify and disentangle Jewish malevolence:–
Andrew C Hitchcock's The Synagogue of Satan (click to download), recommended. 2010: new, updated version. Andrew Carrington Hitchcock reads his expanded Synagogue of Satan
      It's documented up to 2005, including Khazars as false Jews, Cromwell, the French Revolution, the USA and Jackson, the 'Civil War', the Opium Wars, gold and silver standards, greenbacks etc, the Boer War, the destruction of the Tsar, the First and Second World Wars including Germany and Japan, the Depression, the founding of Israel, Iraq wars, assassinations etc., with most of the detail recent. However, perhaps appropriately, it has material on 'Biblical Prophecies' and 'Satanism'. My short review—the book has no conclusion section, and doesn't investigate how e.g. nationalism, democracy, aristocracy, company law, printing, spying were shaped, but certainly (1) shows that a few assassinations of Jews would have been positive, in the sense of reducing net cruelty, (2) fills in the use of money as a weapon, (3) shows the large contribution of Jews to wars and what non-Jews would regard as cruelty. Note that Hitchcock is unaware of much science scepticism AIDS, cell biology, NASA, nuclear matters, 'climate change'.

tomatobubble.com which has other historical material, largely American and world interest. However some of the site needs a small payment. tomatobubble.com/id986.htm (Feb 2017) has 'France Invades Germany 1914, 1923, 1939'
Thomas Dalton on The Jewish Hand in the World Wars in two parts. Survey of world history, and detail on the 20th century wars and 'Jews'.

• Other revisionist attacks include—
reconsideration of Christianity, not from the older rationalist view, but from a perspective perhaps originating with Nietzsche, examining attitudes such as perpetual punishment, the sense of sin, race, 'birthright', the myth of eternal life as a disincentive to action, and possible deliberate Jewish introduction and infiltration of damaging attitudes. An obvious example is the forgiving attitude of [parts of] Christianity. Another is the viciously homicidal and genocidal God.
Medieval chess
Mediaeval chess
    Christianity considered as a slow, long-term injection of Jewish fiction into Europe, is new, at least to me: from this viewpoint, Christianity was a disaster, more or less comparable with modern-day effect of Jews as frauds, liars, and war-mongers, hating and trying to destroy Europe and whites. Bishops, Popes and so on more or less correspond to 'politically correct' collaborators of Jews. Fortunately, Christianity, despite its power, never overcome local forces of opposition.
• And reconsideration of economics, for example as a long-term war involving finance, analogous to the rise of legalism. Most economic theory is short-term and does not consider money backed by governments or other force, crashes, panics, and financial subsidies in a way analogous to wars. And science revisionism including everything from education theory to biology and nuclear weapons and nuclear power. And reconsideration of general personal histories: F J Irsigler's Who Makes Our Money? a south African Catholic medical man who lived through the Second World War.


• My list of JADAR sites
has a few hundred websites (with approximate popularity ratings) which appear to be sound. My notes on Jew-blind organisations—there are very many—I've called 'JOFF' sites for want of a better phrase.


[ Truths about Judaism: Top of Page | Guide for the Politically Perplexed | Jewish articles 2012-2016 | 'Real Jewish Studies' by subjects | March of Revisionism ]

LONG LIST OF SIGNIFICANT JEW-RELATED HISTORICAL EVENTS in date order (includes 1880s–2013)

Ancient World: I've noticed material on Sumer appearing, and Babylon and Egypt, somewhat along the lines of J H Breasted of Chicago, first published in 1916. And protests against their suppression in American 'World Histories' controlled by Jews. Wars, notably in Iraq, have contributed to this small interest. Jews suppress their histories, stories, myths, and legends, probably because Jews don't like to admit their writings are parasitical. Small note: the idea that the Mediterranean Sea was formed by a deluge through Africa/Spain seems undiscussed.

Ancient World   Despite the Renaissance, the rediscoveries of Tacitus and Thucydides, the writings of Gibbon, and Grote on Greece; British education has been starved with centuries of very thin gruel, lightweight discussions on Sparta and mercenaries, Alexander 'the Great'; corresponding more or less to the lightweight material on religion. Hugh Trevor-Roper (=Lord Dacre) thought that reading Julius Caesar was prefect training for 19th-century schoolboys. In the 1940s, Alfred Whitehead praised tolerance, exactly at the time the Judeo-British Empire was collapsing. The childish discussion of 'battle' and 'war' without examination of the causes and effects will I hope be replaced by something more intelligent, and of course is part of the motivation for my writings.

Ancient World   Barnes Review 2009, #5 has some material on Greece, both ancient and modern. [ Including Greece, Persia, Macedonia, Athens, and Sparta; and the Ottoman Empire, including the Armenian Christian genocide (1912-1913); and Holocaust Revisionism; and 'Golden Dawn'. Genetic studies on Greece (notably to what extent modern Greeks resemble ancient Greeks) must in my view be in their infancy. I select that publication to exemplify the slow spread of revisionist ideas back in time. ]

c. 0 - 400 AD   Greek Empire eclipsed by Roman. Decline and Fall of Rome. Christianity allowed after Jews Judaised it and supported an inferior Roman Emperor. Jews waned; Islam was a later 'Abrahamic' invention by Jews to exploit Arabs against whites. A few centuries later, the Khazars were converted, or taken over, or genetically changed by the new 'Judaism'; but were positioned to significantly affect the route between Asia and Europe.

c. 400 - 800 AD   'Dark Ages' marked by lack of documentation, evidence, etc. Jewish 'Christianity' infiltrated European countries, trying to impose a connected networks of churches, financed from rents and other impositions, and acting as spies. The process was (and is) kept secret and dark. It must be similar to the present-day subversions by Jews as a world crypto-elite.

• THIS IS A NEW INTERPRETATION - Remember you heard it here first! — though the early Christian part must have been known to the late ancient world

Based on so-called 'Jews' and their behaviour today, it's possible to reconstruct what must have happened to the Roman Empire. How was it replaced by what's called Christianity?

    Probably a parasitic group emerged, after a millennium or two or three of group evolution in Mesopotamian city civilisation, specialising in targeting ruling individuals and small groups, using acting skills and extreme concealment and what many people would regard as psychopathy. It may resemble the present day's 'Jews'—a group of intra-specialists, and a herd who were expected to follow, and almost always did so, including commands to steal and defraud and kill and rape.
    In about what's now labelled 0 A.D., the Roman Empire had loosely corralled, moved, joined, or otherwise made aware, human and language groups from Spain to Palestine and Slav countries, and from mid-to-north Europe to the Mediterranean and north Africa. It must have been obvious to anyone that new outlooks might change things.
    Early Christians must have been composed of many groups and many influences, including Persian, Babylonian, Egyptian, Greek, Latin and northern mythologies, technological influences such as ships, buildings and food, legal systems, and, importantly, the written word. Papyrus seems to have become cheap and was obviously more portable that stone and baked clay tablets.
    Opinions of early Christians (or 'primitive Christians') are mysterious; they have been censored. But the general view seems to be that they felt enlightened, shining, warm, lighted, golden—the word Christ being Greek, connected with gold. The chi-rho symbol of a fish (from the Greek word), and the use of catacombs in Rome, suggests an empire-wide fusion. They may of course never have amounted to much. But their beliefs would have been nothing like Judaic beliefs.
    Traditionally, unrealistic people consider religions to be other-worldly. But it must have been obvious that organisation was necessary, and probably there was competition for bureaucrats wanting settled careers, with speakers and broadcasters, a common language, with reading and writing for messages and accounting, and buildings. Probably Jews saw the opportunity to exploit in the guise of helping. Think of the development of tithes, for example, where the church in effect gets 10% of the net agricultural product.
    Any group which extended over other groups would presumably benefit from a common language, which would be likely to be incomprehensible to most of the members of the groups, tribes, nations. A lingua franca in fact, though Napoleon never quite managed to spread French across the world. Examples include Latin, Greek, Arabic, Russian, and literati Chinese (China was comparable to Europe in size, with as many accents, and mutually-incomprehensible languages). Hebrew, Yiddish (or whatever) was comparable in the sense of being spread among varied countries, but different in being alien and not indigenous, needing secrecy to hide their outlandish nature.

Fairly modern map; the Aral Sea was once larger. Showing likely areas of religious takeovers by Jews.
Very roughly (places & names change):
UA=Ukraine, AM=Armenia. R=Rome. C=Constantinople. J=Jerusalem. M=Medina.

Arabs occupied a large area, and were well positioned to take over the remains of the Roman Empire, much of it around the Mediterranean Sea.
Note: a silk route between Europe and China went north of the Khazar enclave, marked K. The Khazars had mountain and water barriers to the south, and were well-positioned to act with (or against) Silk Route merchants—and Huns, and Mongols, and the Chinese. And the Kaifeng Jews, visually indistinguishable from Chinese.
    About four centuries passed before Christianity became a state religion. This movement must have been taken over by Jews; the process has been analogous in modern Europe, and what became the USA over a similar time period. Essentially, Jews took a chance on inventing a new group which they could secretly run. Probably all the Gospels and Acts were forgeries, designed to implant 'Yeshua' into Christianity, where it did not previously exist. Judging by Jewish techniques now, their documents and preachers and hired followers and thugs would shout down and drown out opposition. Anyone who thinks that this is implausible should examine modern Jewish techniques: the holocaustianity fraud is a good example of persistent, systematic, unremitting blatant lies, believed (because of inherited Jewish instinct) to be undisprovable. Propaganda about Nero is an interesting parallel from the Roman world to propaganda about Hitler now. The 'black legend' about Spain, parallels the vilification of Germany now.
    ‘Christianity’ as invented by Jews must have been shaped by their desires. Having felt the sharp end of Roman power, they would preach self-absorption, other-worldliness, pacifism and 'turning the other cheek', chastity (a white population control method), leaving families, and giving money away.
    Constantine was notorious as an unattractive bastard child with resentments—just the type Jews today prefer as fronts. He may have relied on Jews to support his army.
      After Constantine: 'The Roman State ... was almost continually at war until it ceased to exist. The Christian States which succeeded it continued to fight each other, though also ... fought states which were not Christian.' There's a suggestive parallel with the USA today, with endless wars, which Jews use to kill off anyone they think rivals them. Whether they have anywhere to go if the US fails must be something they consider.
    For centuries now, historians and commentators have puzzled over the rise of Christianity: why did nobody try to continue the Roman empire? Why not organise? Why not try to improve matters?—and the parallel with today shows why: Jews are concerned with themselves, and, probably genetically, are programmed to hate rivals. They were not interested in prolonging the system, any more than Jews now want the white world to flourish. A controlled Church suited them. Or at least they moved towards it, with fanatical and imbecilic lack of thought. Jews may have declined, or been killed or thrown out—perhaps a motive for trying the same trick on Arabs, and fleeing to Khazaria.
    Histories since the Middle Ages have attributed the destruction of writings of early Christians to Christians (in the Jew-infected sense) themselves. I'd suggest much of the destruction of documents was a Jewish activity carried out with the concentrated energy of parasites: think of the modern parallels—systematic removal of documents about the First World War, 9/11 destruction of financial records, control of historians over the Holohoax, huge funds to support liars, and systematic standardised lies about foreign wars and foreign criminals. Many Americans at the present day seriously imagine that belief in the mythical 'Christ' figure will stop wars.
    Ever since, there has been tension between local and regional churches, which naturally had some local patriotism, and Jews, lurking in the background, promoting their fake made-up rubbish. For example, the Old Testament was made official in the final assembly of a canon of works, all, absurdly, Jewish. Much of the Middle Ages is a tug or war between lurking Jews, who generally made trouble by fomenting wars, and the more overt Roman and Eastern and Orthodox Churches, who often foolishly took up larger loans than they could possibly afford. Denunciations of Jews and usury by the Church looks likely to be partrly fake: the Roman Church continued to use Jewish money, so probably the denunciations were to keep the Jewish monopoly on coinage and credit. The 'they killed Jesus' idea may have been made up to pretend the Church was very anti-Jewish, or to highlight real or supposed supposed differences between sects or groups.
    And this state of affairs still applies. At present, Jews have the upper hand, and have changed many tenets of churches unrecognisably; and of course they had the triumph of massacring millions of Orthodox Russians, equivalent perhaps to massacres in north Africa and Cyprus in about 100 AD. The influence of Jews in Turkey and Arabia and Africa is becoming better-known now, with Internet.
    Paradoxically, there is sense in the phrase 'Judeo-Christian', since Jews arranged the forgery of the New Testament.
    We are, now, accustomed to the separation of Church from State: it seems natural that a church should co-exist with people who aren't official religious believers or performers. But it's possible early Jews wanted to rule; maybe they were not powerful or convincing or impressive enough to impose themselves. Considering how the 'Holocaustianity' fraud is being pushed worldwide, I'd guess the unstated aim was to rule—something to bear in mind. In my opinion this separation was most fortunate, since it allowed some scope for creativity and genius.

Based on so-called 'Jews' and their behaviour today, it's also possible to reconstruct the invention of Islam, as Rome and Christianity finally weakened and failed.

    • Inventing Islam. Jews had writing. The technologies for producing ink (brush or pen) on papyrus, and binding the result, were well worked-out. Jews had plenty of stories to draw on, and a crude philosophy. They must have wanted an army of controllable aggressive thugs, to carry out their own orders. Someone, possibly Jews, invented scripts in such languages as Arabic and Georgian.
    Here's an indication of what Jews felt as the remains of the Roman Empire left little for parasites. Jewish academic Dr. David Wasserstein: "Islam saved Jewry. This is an unpopular, discomforting claim in the modern world. But it is a historical truth. ... First, in 570 AD, when the Prophet Mohammad was born, the Jews and Judaism were on the way to oblivion. And second, the coming of Islam saved them, providing a new context in which they not only survived, but flourished, laying foundations for subsequent Jewish cultural prosperity&mdashalso in Christendom—through the medieval period into the modern world."
    Wasserstein is saying—not very clearly—that the army of Muslims were thieves controlled by Jews.
    The Quran or Koran may have been composed by Jews, or on their suggestions. The tradition is that the illiterate Mohammed spent time in a cave, and emerged with writings which were God's words, G-d's words, Allah's words, or whatever. Jews regard themselves as God, rather amusingly, so the tradition may well be accurate in that sense—discussing with Mohammed what he wanted, it must have been easy enough to assemble a pastiche of Jewish material aimed at Arabs, and add to it when circumstances changed. Let's look at supporting evidence.
    The Quran is the first Arab writing of any consequence (unless earlier material was lost or destroyed). This alone suggests that literate foreigners compiled it, in language(s) which need no be Arabic. The script may have been a Jew invention: it is right-to-left. The sounds must have been similar. Vowel sounds were not used; some texts are undotted. The Quran does not use Jewish script, presumably what's now called Hebrew, but Jews would not have wanted Arabs to be able to read their 'sacred' psychopathy.
    The whole point of the Quran must have been to hijack beliefs of Arabs and insert Jewish desires and beliefs, to give Jews themselves some immunity. For example, Abraham was inserted. Otherwise, Arabs were to be as violent and vicious and grasping as possible, with Christians a possible exception, depending on Jewish policies at different times. Of course the Talmud provided many handy examples of viciousness. And of course it provided no examples of unparasitic activity.
Here are some comments on these violent tribal cults (too long to be copied here). Here's what may be the naturally evolved state of Arabs: The Arab was a nomad, not a cultivator, and brought with him ... agricultural disaster. ... The Arab is sometimes called the Son of the Desert, but ... in most cases he is the Father of the Desert, having created it himself, and the arid waste in which he lives and on which practically nothing will grow is the direct result of his appalling indolence, combined with his simian trait of destroying everything he does not understand ... Yet Arabs are withal, the quickest of peoples to follow the call to truth and righteousness. For their natures are relatively simple and free from the distorting effect of bad habits and evil ways ...
    Here's a book review on Islam and 'Liberal Democracies' (i.e. Jew-controlled societies). Too long for inclusion, but note similarities:
[1] 'Jizya' a permanent tax, sounds Jewish, a bit like central bank control;
[2] 'Taqiyya' resembles 'Kol Nidre';
[3] Death penalty for apostasy;
[4] Ritual cruel animal slaughter;
[5] Food taboos;
[6] Circumcision;
[7] Legal system of a sort;
[8] Ritual killing techniques reserved for enemies;
[9] Child sex;
[10] Prostitution, slavery (still carried out);
[11] Taboos against representative art;
[12] Lunar calendar, presumably because of lack of obvious seasons;
[13] Fanaticism liable to be triggered;
[14] 'Allah will provide' mentality is similar to Jewish parasitic outlook; [15] Singing, chanting.
    But there are differences, which are attributable to Jewish skewing:
[1] Judaism relies on a narrow specialised clique, but Islam can be spread by anyone who can read Arabic.
[2] Islam allows conversion, which of course gets the numbers up, whereas Jews generally prohibit conversion. So much so, that today Muslim populations are huge;
[3] Dysgenic things can be expected to have been inserted into Islam, where there are many genetic diseases—though Judaism has these, too;
[4] Jihad is not explicitly present in Judaism, where deep fanatical grudging hate is nursed, and mass murder run by Jews occurs only when conditions are favourable.
[5] Judaism is usually a minority cult;
[6] Judaism celebrates (usually in secret, on encoded) past triumphs, such as murders. As far as I know, Islam is assumed to be more-or-less without planning or memorials, since historical awareness might lead them to quiz Jews.
[6] One of the reasons for permitting polygyny (up to four 'wives') may be the genetics of sickle-cell anemia (or Thalassaemia) which is lethal if the parents are both carriers.

• END OF THIS NEW INTERPRETATION
[ Start of 'Real Jewish Studies' | Top of Page: Truths about Judaism ]

700 AD very roughly to the present day.   Muslims, and the lost Khazar Empire: Note that the combination of a nomadic group, unused to towns, and the opportunities for parasitism, plus the crystallising effect of book-induced inbreeding and hatred of other groups, seem to have combined almost ideally after about 700 AD to produce cults dangerous to all who came into contact with them. The parachuted-in version of 'Judaism' post-dated Islam, though not by much, suggesting that parasitism had become a workable lifestyle preying on static civilisations. Possibly predator-prey relationships will be found, if serious history continues to increase.
    'The classic example of power through fanaticism is the rise of Judaism. The Khan added nothing to the material resources of the Khazars, and yet, within a few years, they had acquired a large empire. Undoubtedly, the religion imposed by the Khan was an essential element in the success of this nation. ...' (Modified to illustrate the point from a passage by Bertrand Russell on Islam in his book 'Power').
    [An identical story, about a/the Khazar conversion, has been dated to 1000 AD. If interested, see here, below. The 'Abrahamic' religions seem to have had more conversions and alliances than customary history likes.]
    Note added June 2014: David Duke and Kevin MacDonald joined forces in opposing the Khazar hypothesis. David Duke quotes Arthur Koestler, a 'Hungarian Jew' and populariser of the Khazar idea, who hoped that if most Eastern European Jews were descended from the Khazars, the racial basis for anti-Semitism would be removed and anti-Semitism itself could disappear. However, Koestler did little original research, but simply quoted from a number of sources, probably authentic, some very early, on the Khazars (who lived between the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea, north of the Caucasus Mountains—which are taller than the Alps). Other books on the subject include a Russian (I think) precursor, Lev Gumilev, head of an ethnographic institute—though I haven't checked Koestler's book. Jews, Khazars, DNA and Jews and Muslims: Similar Tribal Cults look at some of the issues, post-Roman Empire. Kevin MacDonald's work on Jews assumed they were 'Jews' as defined more-or-less Biblically in the USA, and wanted a genetic link, not a discontinuity between two separate groups of 'Jews'. Most 'Jews' seem to have settled down into opposing the Khazar idea, within themselves, by 2014. David Duke claims they promote the Khazar idea for non-Jews (including Michael A Hoffman; his works are all Khazar-based).
    This seems a mistake to me. [1] People don't object to Jews because those people are 'anti-Semitic'—itself a crude expression. They object because of behaviour, not the 'racial basis'. Changing the name makes no difference! A Jew by any other name smells the same. [2] A collection of converts may be genetically modified by their influential 'Holy' book(s). [3] There is a controlled experiment here: Islam was influential at roughly the same time, spread widely, and must have had effects promoting inbreeding, fanaticism, and so on in the affected populations. So I see no difficulty with a somewhat isolated tribe, the Khazars, being genetically modified by Talmudic material over a few centuries.
    As a thought experiment: if a population were to be suddenly exposed to pornography in large quantities, and were told pornographers were wonderful people worth a lot of money, and pornographers were allowed to expel or kill objectors to pornography, would you expect that population after a few centuries to be well-balanced?
    It's possible Duke and MacDonald have a submerged aim in mind: to keep 'Jews' together, and not allow the possibility of their spreading to Europe, or Birobidjan, or Madagascar. With luck, counterattacks like Open Borders for Israel and detailed analysis of Jewish assets will finally weaken them.

Jews in China
  • Marco Polo's Travels may well be spurious
  Arnold Leese on Jews, Communism, China (published in 1949)
  • Genghis Khan [or many other spellings!] allegedly spared people with useful skills, but slaughtered other types. It seems at least possible that he was influenced by Jews, or Jew types.
  Dr Robert Maryks quotes a 'Jew' discussing his 'Sephardic ancestors': some went to Istanbul, Baghdad, Tehran, and through the silk road up to Shanghai .. and Palermo and Trabia in Sicily...' Just an example. Probably Jewish control over 20th century media suppressed any mention of Jews in China, and their activities.
c 900 AD   Some 'Jewish' bloodlines made their way to faraway lands including Norway and France. Normandy was ceded to the 'Norseman' Rolf the Ganger, 'Rollo', 'leader of the Vikings', in the treaty of Saint-Claire-Sur-Epte with Charles the Simple. The family of Rolf took the name 'Sinclair' from this treaty. William the Conqueror was Rolf's great great great grandson. The Sinclairs founded Freemasonry. So here we have supposed 'northmen' who opened up England to the Jews. [Brief unsourced online comment from thruthebook, 29 June 2016].
[ Start of 'Real Jewish Studies' | Top of Page: Truths about Judaism ]

c 1000 - c 1500 Expulsions of Jews. This very much shortened list is from Frank Britton's booklet, the source probably being the Encyclopaedia Britannica of the time.
    BUT—IMPORTANT—Migrations and infiltrations of Jews are rarely noted. Kevin MacDonald for example estimates two million moved to the USA by about 1900.
    ENGLAND: Jews expelled in 1290 by Edward I. Not permitted to re-enter till 1655. (SCOTLAND an exception)
    FRANCE: Expelled in 1306 by Philip the Fair. A few were permitted to return but were again evicted in 1394. Jewish settlements remained in Bordeaux, Avignon, Marseilles, (from where they were evicted in 1682) and in the northern province of Alsace.
    SAXONY: Expelled in 1349.
    BRABANT Execution of all Jews in Brussels for poisoning wells. (Not in Britton).
    HUNGARY: By 1092 the Jews were in control of Hungary's tax collections. In 1360 they were expelled but later returned. In 1582 they were again expelled from the Christian part of Hungary.
    BELGIUM: Expelled in 1370. A few settled there again in 1450, but no large numbers came till 1700.
    SLOVAKIA: Ousted from Prague in 1380. Many settled there again after 1562. In 1744 Marie Theresa expelled them again.
    AUSTRIA: Expelled in 1420 by Albrecht V.
    NETHERLANDS: Expelled from Utrecht in 1444.
    SPAIN: Expelled in 1492. Included e.g. SICILY.
    LITHUANIA: Expelled in 1495 by Grand Duke Alexander. They later returned.
    PORTUGAL: Expelled in 1498.
    PRUSSIA: Expelled in 1510.
    ITALY: Expelled from Kingdom of Naples and Sardinia in 1540.
    BAVARIA: Banned permanently in 1551.
    SCANDINAVIA: Jews were not permitted to enter Sweden until 1782. None were permitted to enter Denmark before the 17th century and they were not allowed in Norway after 1814.
    The exception was POLAND, very likely because of large Khazar presence there after the Khazar conversion, and Turkey, ditto: 'Largely as a result of the concessions of the Polish crown which began with the Statute of Kalisz, Poland became known throughout Europe as the "paradisus Judeorum," the paradise of the Jews. ... who ... inevitably headed east toward Poland, taking their language, "juedische Deutsch," or Yiddish with them.'
    Important note: Jewish policy is essentially parasitic, and a hit-and-run strategy is an example of this. It's possible some 'expulsions' were in fact Jews moving, taking loot with them, and falsely claiming to have been thrown out. Or 'expulsions' may have been secretly agreed, Jews escaping punishment for murders. Such agreements might well have included payments from Jews. The invention and enforcement of paper money altered Jewish strategy: in modern Europe, Jewish strategy is to ruin e.g. Belgium, France, and Sweden, then move out, claiming to have been driven out.

'Wandering Jew' seems to have had several implications. For example, any mobile or displaced group may have been called 'Jews', or may have called themselves 'Jews'. The etymology of 'Jew', and the ways the word was used as printing became established, and the ways the word was used in religious speech and writings, appear to be contentious—but it's difficult to be sure even if the issue is genuinely contentious.

10th - 12th centuries, straddling 1000 AD. A passing remark by Miles W Mathis (in his benito.pdf and phillip.pdf) is '... Burgundians in my recent paper on the Crusades: ... had been Jewish from way back, being captured by Jewish lines even before the year 1000. This reminded me of Ganshof on Feudalism and suggests Jews may have invented parts of the 'Feudal System'.
      [Ganshof: '... Feudalism may be conceived of as a form of society possessing well-marked features which can be defined without difficulty. They may be summarized as follows: a development pushed to extremes of the element of personal dependence in society, with a specialized military class occupying the higher levels in the social scale; an extreme subdivision of the rights of real property; a graded system of rights over land created by this subdivision and corresponding in broad outline to the grades of personal dependence just referred to; and a dispersal of political authority amongst a hierarchy of persons who exercise in their own interest powers normally attributed to the State and which are often, in fact, derived from its break-up.
      This type of society, whether one calls it 'feudalism' or the 'feudal régime', was that of western Europe in the tenth, eleventh and twelfth centuries. It came into existence in France, Germany, the kingdom of Burgundy-Arles and Italy, all of them states deriving from the Carolingian empire, and in other countries--England, certain of the Christian kingdoms of Spain, the Latin principalities of the Near East--which passed under their influence. ...']


1066 Understood as a principal date in English history. A revisionist view is that William 'the Bastard'—note the surname suppression—was Jewish, and the 'Norman' Invasion a Jewish event, probably preceded by a feint with Norwegians attacking in the north. The small size of the invasion suggests there must have been collaborators. Might be compared with Jews in Russia after 1917, and 'Communists'—the 'harrying of the north' having genocidal population-killing effects, and the Domesday Book a bureaucratic list of assets. The 'New Forest' seems to have involved the destruction of Anglo-Saxon or other churches, a typical Jewish marker.
      There are suggestive comparisons of mediaeval guilds and modern times: apothecaries and physicians must have had a deadening effect on medicine, for example, with an absurd reliance on Galen, comparable with about half of post-1945 medical research. Military/ police and religious structures were outside those schemata, just as they are today, with their own propaganda and materials—the proportions of course leaning heavily to propaganda and money in the religious structures. And teaching—because of its long-term nature, and because serious education was largely private—was excluded from guilds. Law was another exception, easy to understate. Perhaps builders of out-of-town huge stone castles, cathedrals, churches, and perhaps houses and halls, who must have been skilled and somewhat mobile, gave rise to the 'Freemasons' idea, later of course taken over by Jews and collaborators.

very approx 1090-1200   Assassins may represent another genetically violent and parasitic group, based on Judaic or Moslem or other attitudes and/or writings. They are supposed to have been an Islamic splinter-group or cult, with intense internal propaganda, and with members who were killers of rival Islamic leaders. Based near the Caspian Sea, they were based in the extreme south-east of the Khazar empire. They seem to have been erased by the Mongols.

Jew Mongol Khazar Netanyahu
Netanyahu and his father.
Why so-called 'Jews' may be referred to as 'Turco-Mongol'. Note that Khazars (see this tribe as converts to Judaism) may have helped Mongols invade Europe, just as they helped Moslems invade Europe earlier, and later.
c 1200 - c 1400 Mongol invasions of Europe, Rus and other territories, China. Names include Timur (or Tamerlaine) and tribal descriptions include 'Turco-Mongol'. Although largely forgotten outside Russia, these invasions made a great impression at the time. Marlowe's Tamburlaine the Great was written after about the same time as we are from Napoleon. (I'm assuming conventional historical dating; and that the events were more-or-less as described). As with the Hun empire, something like a millennium earlier, there's some insubstantiality, caused perhaps by the lack of written material: unlike Jews, Christians and Muslims (in that order), Huns and Mongols did not leave sacred or pseudo-sacred writings, perhaps through some accident, such as not having papyrus, or not having secure enough storage. So they join the pre-Greek and pre-Roman empires of antiquity in surviving only when specialists decoded their writings or inferred their beliefs.
      ['Curmudgeon' in TheOccidentalObserver, Jan 2017, states that Khazars (see this group as converts to Judaism) co-operated with Mongols in invading Europe—something obvious enough once it's pointed out.]

c 1340 - c 1700   The Black Death peak mid-1300s?) and Plagues are of course not well documented or researched. However, it ought to be mentioned that there may have been Jewish involvement. [ Hans Zinnser's 1935 Rats, Lice and History is mostly about typhus, and anecdotal rather than historical; Zinsser is described as American. The 1910-11 Encyclopædia Britannica has no separate entry for 'Black Death'; the entry 'Plague' was jointly written by Arthur Shadwell, who wrote on malaria, cancer, London's water, etc, and Harriet L Hennessy, a physician and pharmacologist. 18th and 19th century plagues are detailed, and the 15th and 16th represented by ten works, 4 from Venice, two from Basel. The Plague of London 1665-1666 and the 'Great Fire' are suspiciously close to the Bank of England importation. Note that, unlike many epidemics, plague 'cannot be traced with certainty to definite time and place'. Amazingly, the 1976 Encyclopædia Britannica has no entries under Black Death (though it has for 'Black Muslims'), or Plague, and nothing noticeable under Disease. The Micropædia has a few entries under Black Death, but only a reference to the novel by Camus under 'Plague'! The topics have fallen into the world of hack writers. ]

c 1400 - c 1600   The Reformation. Starting with translations of the Bible. It's not known, or not clear, to what extent this was a Jewish movement. Note however the important division right through the movement. Luther, having read Jewish 'holy' books, became anti-Jewish. On the other hand some states were undecided: the Netherlands, first, then England, became Protestant and were more-or-less Jewish invaded, as the prospects for the New World became clear, and seaports were sought. Though of course this process took time, and was not completed in Britain until Cromwell's death, after which the Restoration of the monarchy made things look somewhat as before, plus such organisations as the Bank of England.
      It's likely that the 'Counter-Reformation' was Jewish-propelled (by Loyola), and the 'Reformation' too. In each case, Jewish interests would be subtly inserted into the non-religious power groups which they influenced. One such interest of course was war between non-Jews.

c 1500 - c 1650   Western Europe supposedly largely free of Jews. When people discuss Jews in (say) Venice, Italy, or Spain, bear in mind this 150-year hiatus. No doubt there is an intimate connection with the immense flowering of the Renaissance in Europe. And no doubt a connection with the finance of wars and their locations.

1522   the twelfth of October, when that noble knight Andrea d'Amaral, your patron saint, threw open the gates of Rhodes to the Turk from Jean Raspail's Camp of the Saints. [ Most English-speaking whites have no idea of the prolonged history of Jews permitting invasions. Just one specimen ]

1534   Foundation of the Jesuits about this time. I'd suggest the Iberian (Spanish & Portuguese) Jews and crypto-Jews wanted to try to control the Reformation and Counter-Reformation and this group was part of the policy. Jews of course would want to prolong the absurdities of 'Roman' Catholicism, many aspects of which worked to their advantage.

1572   St Bartholomew's Day Massacre in France. Revisionist-minded people might consider reframing old-style Jew-denying history to include hypotheses involving Jews.
    And here's a good one, from Miles Mathis: ‘The King [Henry II of France] was more likely poisoned. ... we find a strange reaction from Montgomery, who had up to that time been savagely repressing Huguenots in the Scotch Guard: he joined them and waged war against France. I suggest he was chosen as a scapegoat for the King's death and didn't appreciate it. I also suggest that with the murder of his King, he became aware of what the Medici faction was up to: it had just performed a successful coup through the Queen [Catherine de' Medici]. So Montgomery's war wasn't against France, it was against the Medicis. He should be seen as a hero. This means the religious wars of that period have been sold to us under a false pretext. We are told it was between the Catholics and the Protestants. But seeing that Paris was ruled by the Jewish Medicis, we see it was a war of the Medicis against the Christian Church more broadly. Catherine ordered the rich Huguenots murdered in the St. Bartholomew's Day massacre not because they were Protestant, but because they were prominent aristocrats and Christian. ... it "printed on Protestant minds the indelible conviction that Catholicism was a bloody and treacherous religion".
    That's convenient for the Medicis, right? We see that these religious wars did double duty: 1) getting rid of rich aristocrats whose properties could then be seized, 2) blackwashing Catholicism by making Catholics look like the bad guys. But ... it wasn't really Catholics ordering the Huguenot genocide: it was the Medicis. The history of France has been rewritten by Jewish "scholars".
    Mathis does not add that both Christian sides may have known this, but said nothing, suggesting Christianity was itself subordinate to Jewish money.


1585-1604   Anglo-Spanish War (that link is to Shakespearean sceptic's writings) looks to me like an indirectly provoked war, probably by Jews, in the same way the Germans and Russians were forced into war by Jews 350 years later. [ I'd like interested people to see if they can find evidence for that, bearing in mind that Spain and Portugal had expelled Jews, and England supposedly had none, so Jews could be expected to be hostile and have their eyes on gold from South America. And Jews owned slaving ships. ]

1605   'Tsar Fyodor Borisovich Godunov son of Tsar Boris Godunov, ruled less than a year as Feodor II after his father's death in 1605; murdered in June the same year.' [ Speculative comment: it seems possible that a Jewish movement deposed the Godunov dynasty to substitute a Jewish dynasty. ]

1534-1620   Japan banned Christianity expelling the Jesuits, following warnings by a sea captain, shipbuilder and navigator, William Adams. That's how it's usually stated. I'd like to suggest what happened may rather have been connected with Jews attempting to get access to Japan, since the Jesuit founders appear to have been 'marrano' Jews from Spain, deliberately mislabelling their scheme..

1650   Birth of Dutch William or William of Orange. (Orange is an area of the Netherlands).
    [ He was too young to have participated in the Amsterdam Synagogue scheme for the 'Bank of England'. King of England, Ireland, and Scotland 1689-1702. 1688 'Glorious Revolution': there was a Dutch Invasion; the meme that "England was only ever invaded in 1066" is false. It's easy to miss Dutch connections with Jews: the Dutch East Indies exploitation; the Amsterdam diamond market; Amsterdam prostitution; the frantic resistance to Hitler during WW2, resulting in their being bombed; participation in the Ann Frank fraud; use of Dutch airspace to supply Israel (see 1992 cargo plane crash); the Islamic connections of Geert Wilders; the availability of 'welcome the stranger' invasion supporters. Boers despite being Dutch in origin are ignored, no doubt because of Jewish hate of whites. ]

1655   Demurrer by William Prynne argued against Jewish admission. Prynne is now usually dismissed as a Puritan fanatic who hated the theatre.

1660-1670 incl Diaries of Samuel Pepys. These were written in shorthand. I suspect, by various clues—even the name—that Pepys was a spy, perhaps a one-man Mass Observation, whose job was to watch for Jew-aware people and movements in London of the time. The diaries are supposed (after three hundred years or so) to have been transcribed correctly. I'd be surprised if this is true.

1661   Cromwell's body disinterred and his mummified head, with two other regicides, displayed on a pole. Only about five years after Cromwell gave Jews a foothold in England.

1665   Official Gazette claims to have been established in this year.

1666 In England, the 'Great Fire' seems to have been a land-clearance scheme by fire, after which the Jewish 'Bank of England' was constructed attributed falsely to disgruntled people. See also the Cestui Que Vie Act complete with bilingual confusion and substitution of 'state', or at least private corporation, for monarchy.

1685   Death of Charles II aged 54. It's possible, in fact likely, that his exit was intentionally helped by his 'medical' treatment.

c 1500 - c 1700   Henry VIII had re-introduced interest and plundered the monasteries; there was new gold and silver from the New World; and new expensive armaments. Earlier finances in Italy and Germany faded. This set the stage for Jewish movement to Britain from the Netherlands and from Venice, under Cromwell: Britain was nearer the New World, and had many ports for ships. Probably the Bank of England was built after deliberate fire clearance in London. And probably the decline of the Hanseatic League followed and was planned. War devastated German states: 1618-1648 'Thirty Years War' is another revisionist topic. And in the following century enclosures improved farming, but not ordinary peoples' lives. ...

c. 1500-1880   The revisionist process now is extending back through time, and this process will I hope continue and professionalise. Religious writers on Jews include
Martin Luther (short book on Jews, 1543ish)
Johann Eisenmenger (two-volume Entdecktes Judenthum (1711ish). (A downloadable 1743 (or 1742, or 1748!) 2-vol work possibly based on Eisenmenger is RABINICAL LITERATURE: OR, THE TRADITIONS OF THE JEWS, Contained in their TALMUD and other Mystical Writings...).
Dr Alexander McCaul said by Michael Hoffman to be a devastating 19th-century critic of the Talmud. (See later).
[Here is Metapedia's List of Books about the Jewish Question. Warning: Metapedia may have been taken over and ruined.>]
Some online sites used by mileswmathis.com
Genealogies, names, families ancestry.com | www.avotaynu.com* | burkespeerage.com* | geni.com [NB Jewish] | ethnicelebs.com ['celebrities'] | findagrave.com [last resting places] | fabpedigree.com [ancients; non-authoritative] | familysearch.org | genealogieonline.nl/en/ | Genealogy.com | geneanet.org [Genealogies] | myheritage.com [NB Jewish?] | home.rootsweb.ancestry.com | thepeerage.com* | wargs.com ['William Addams Reitwiesner Genealogical Services'] | wikipedia.com | WikiTree.com [free family trees] | | Archives, Books archive.org | books/google.com | | Popular Beliefs, enquiries, questions justanswer.com | litreactor.com [writing info e.g. researching legal jargon] | revolvy.com | semiticcontroversies | truecrimelibrary.com [crimelibrary.com has vanished] | urbanlegends.about.com | vhs62.com vellejo high school 62 yearbooks | wikia.com ['fans' of mass 'culture'] | | *Seem relevant, but I think not used
Important: I'm not suggesting these sites are user-friendly, or even able to explain what they do: they are in the established tradition of computer opacity

      Computer-Age Revisionism: 1600-the present day   A stellar example of revisionism is Miles W Mathis's website, is dependent on the unprecedented access to documents by Internet—books, monographs, news items, biographies, photos—which even the best libraries of the past couldn't match. Internet permits families to be checked for distinctive signs of Jew tampering, biographies to be compared and checked for absurdities, intersections detected between organisations, and so on. Perhaps unexpectedly, the Jew-patrolled Wikipedia is a fertile source for data mining of biographies. An interesting possibility is that monarchs and dynasties may be checked for Jewish infiltration. Lambert Simnel and Perkin Warbeck appear to be Jewish or Jew-controlled pretenders, and the 'Windsors' Jewish, in England, for example. This technique is well-adapted to smallish groups—families, aristocracies, leaders—but less useful for large-scale events, such as wars, invasions, and anything large-scale. If records will be published giving information on corporations, armies, large industries, governments and so on, no doubt data mining could lead to huge advances in understanding. Mathis supplements (1) Biographies with (2) visual clues, derived from his portrait painting, as to facial and body similarities and sizes, and related issues of photo fakery; and (3) organisational procedures and promotions in legal, military, aristocratic family, and intelligence structures. So that—just three examples—Charles Manson, bearded and in prison, is impossible. And the Tate killings were a fake. And the Dresden bombing (or photo(s)?) was faked. [ Examples, loaded from his site: occult.pdf Bacon, Dee, Cromwell, and others, and conflicts between landed aristocrats, merchants, bankers, and proto-scientists, with possibly faked documents and specially promoted belief systems (millennarians, puritans...), where 'occult' means something like 'secret intelligence' though Mathis tends to regard all the people as 'spooks', and the aims change over time | French Revolution a first-class re-evaluation the 'Revolution' as a device to fleece the French Roman Catholic Church | Was Napoleon Jewish? looks at France, Poland, Austria, Egypt, and other aspects of Napoleon which may have been misrepresented | Salem witch trials pieces together the probably true story. Hawthorne looks back at Bostonians (and the East India Co), plus Thoreau (1817-1862), and Walt Whitman (1819-1892) | Lincoln is a terrific reassessment of the 'assassination' by an actor in 1865, and Custer of Custer in 1876 | Marx (as far as I know, one of the best pieces on Marx) looks at wealthy industrialists (often of course 'Jews') misleading radicals, as does Labour Party, Noami Klein, Naomi Wolf | Trayvon is on race wars, which Mathis seems to think are not real—he doesn't seem to sense the intentional Jewish prompting. | Taxes is a paper on deliberate lies about servicing interest payments. | Nash.pdf looks at the manufacture of Jewish intellectual 'heroes', in this case based around the film A Beautiful Mind, and fake science, fake economics, and fake prizes and awards. I'm not claiming all his work is correct or original; but it's a relief to see head-on revisionism. | Here are two pieces on planted horror/distraction stories: Sharon Tate and O J Simpson. On June 2016 Mathis posted Lenin and the 'Russian Revolution'. At the time of writing, Mathis is looking at the beginning of the 'American Revolution': Who Was George Washington?. (Mathis has not examined Mussolini, or Japan since about 1900, or events in Africa).]

c 1700 - c 1800   18th century with improved science and technology (Newton, later Lavoisier, and many others. See my review of a book on John Hunter for the intellectual atmosphere, and the unnoticed intrusions of Jews) led to the disaster of Napoleon. However, there were extensive discussions on Jews, which later were ignored and suppressed. But enough is left to be able to reconstruct the debates and have some idea of omissions. Jewish names include Mendez da Costa and Sampson Gideon; opponents in England include Sir John Barnard, the Earl of Egmont, Sir Edmund Isham; the main contention was on 'Naturalization'.

1717 Oct 31st (Hallowe'en) Freemasonry: United Grand Lodge of England allegedly founded. I take the date from Oct 31st 2017, allegedly the 300th anniversary. Note that Eisenmenger's 2-volume work was published in about 1711; perhaps this work added to Jew urgency.

1732 Jews' Free School started in London. The name seems to have been retained, more or less: 1817 seems to have been moved to Ebenezer Square, London. Probably this was much larger, and designed to advance Jews in post-Napoleonic Europe, by doing their bit with propaganda and lies. 1822 moved to Bell Lane, London. By 1900, claimed to be 'the largest school in Europe'.

1753, 1754   Jewish Naturalization Bill was part of the process of Jewish attempted penetration. Wording probably chosen to sound 'natural', and to avoid any suggestion of citizenship or native Britishness. There was a conflict between the House of Lords and House of Commons. It was never made an Act of Parliament.

1776   Tom Paine's Common Sense published. Interesting partly for its anti-monarchical standpoint, possibly marking a discontinuity between royalty as just another family, albeit special, and royalty as a large, all-encompassing, power grouping.
      [ Notes on Unifications of Territories. Revisionist attention to underestimated secret Jewish groups makes it clear that unifications offer special attractions to infiltrating Jews. Some examples:
France under Charlemagne (before c 1000 AD)
Unification of Muscovy into Russia, from say 1400 very interesting because of the vast territory—something like half the size of Africa—and the possibilities for infiltration opened by the huge range of tribes/ areas/ cultures.
1516 Unification of Spain under Hapsburgs after the Reconquista
Dutch revolt against Spain; Netherlands and Flanders etc, offering scope for Amsterdam Jews
1603 England and Scotland unification, offering scope for Jews in Scotland; 1707 Wales, 1801 Ireland with again Jews opportunities
1776 US unification; it's obvious enough now this was heavily influenced by the Jewish 'Bank Of England'
1871. Multiple kingdoms both in Germany, and Italy, were respectively unified; 1871 therefore being an important date. Both these events were heavily Jewish-influenced. ]


1776   'United States' declare independence; 1783 Treaty of Paris recognises the new USA. The war against the USA must have involved Jewish interests, as indeed was known at the time. Note that Washington was a Freemason (an online source says in 1753, aged 21, Washington was made a 'Master Mason'). Note also that 'Benjamin Franklin' was from old money—most or all of the 'revolutionaries' were crypto-British. (See Miles Mathis). 240 years later, there is still friction with Jews, if possibly worse than ever before, though it may be that the 1913 Fed/ 1914 war against Germany/ 'Great Depression'/ 1939 war against Germany reached a high point which is being eroded. [ Anyone seriously considering the state of the world must re-examine the USA, now old enough for patterns to be drawn despite the confused cobwebs of false ideas designed to baffle. And similarly in Europe: Napoleon Revisited, too long for inclusion here, looks at the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Legends, and incidentally headed off serious investigation into the Middle Ages. napoleon-revisited.html#intellectuals surveys the post-Napoleon intellectual atmosphere in this very sad time, in which important truths were smothered and choked. ]

1789   'French Revolution'. Here's an online comment: ... Few present-day Americans realize that France played as great a role in the American Revolution as the Americans themselves—a fact of which King Louis XVI and Benjamin Franklin, were acutely aware. King Louis XVI later remarked upon it, as his government groaned under the cost of aiding the Americans, when France supplied the men, ships, and materiel that enabled the Comte de Grasse's French fleet to bottle up British commander Cornwallis in Yorktown, Virginia while Rochambeau's French forces, led by George Washington, circled in for the victory. ...

1792   Catherine 'the Great' of Russia (1729-1796). Not Russian: born Princess Sophie of Anhalt-Zerbst. (NB Princess Alix of Hesse, granddaughter of Victoria, married Czar Nicholas II in 1894, and was crowned Empress of Russia in 1895. European royalty permitted this type of permeability). 1792 War with Poland. [ From Oona Craig: Poland was Jew-influenced. The Jews infiltrated the Polish nobility in the 16th century under Casimir IV...the same way the Jewish bankers infiltrated the British nobility under Queen Victoria and Edward VII in the 19th century. (Actually the infiltration of Britain began with the crypto-Jew William Cecil's control of Elizabeth I and her illegitimate children). Many Poles were unaware of the Jewish infiltration of the nobility. The largest Jewish population in Europe was located in Polish-Lithuanian territory. When Catherine the Great conquered Poland, Russia acquired thousands of Jews who had been formerly barred from entering Russia. Catherine tried to prevent the Jews from entering Russia by establishing borders called the "Pale of Settlement." It didn't work. By conquering Poland and absorbing Poland's Jews, the Russian monarchs embraced the time bomb that eventually killed them. Jews assassinated EVERY Tsar beginning with Alexander I, who (like Napoleon) was poisoned. Nikolai I was poisoned (following his successful resistance to the Jew-orchestrated Crimean War). Alexander II (after 14 unsuccessful Jewish attempts to kill him) had his legs bombed off. (Alexander II had angered the Rothschilds by entering the US Civil War in support of Lincoln). Alexander III and family were bombed (not the first attempt) while traveling in the Imperial Train; Alexander held up the collapsed roof of his compartment to allow his family to escape, thereby damaging his kidneys. His son Nikolai II and family were shot. A look at French and American history reveals the same history of relentless serial assassinations of "independent" nonJew leaders. See: The Red Thread by Andrei Krylienko. ]

1797   End of the Republic of Venice; foundation officially dated 697 AD, coinciding roughly with the invention of Islam, and the invention of Khazar Judaism. The extinction by Napoleon probably encouraged migration of Jews westward, after the securing of the USA in 1776. [ Best-known in England is (or was) through Wordsworth's sonnet On the Extinction of the Venetian Republic, composed 1802, but without any mention of Napoleon, or for that matter 'Shakespeare'. A difficult exercise in disentanglement. At this time I recommend Miles Mathis on Napoleon, and, in passing, on other issues, such as the importance of islands. ]

Note on the post-'Congress of Vienna'   'Balance of Power' Theory
  • Rough Overview
    Anglo-Spanish War 1585-1604
  • Here are some of the wars which happened after Cromwell (and others) readmitted Jews into England. (The process of 'Civil War' started 1642)
  • Wars with the Dutch Republic (short wars; starting 1652, 1665, 1672)
  • Wars with France after the 'French Revolution' (1793-1802). After 1812, 'Balance of power' came into general use
  • War with USA (1812) to fix US and European spheres
  • Wars in China over opium
  • War with Boers (Dutch) in South Africa
  • War with Germany (1914-1945)
  • Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, North Africa
I'm suggesting that Jewish influence helps explain these events, and that knowledge of Jewish activities has been suppressed very thoroughly. 'Balance of Power' is probably a phrase to hide Jewish attacks on countries which at the time were leaders. Two examples at present are the USA and UK, but looking back at many wars suggests a standard Jewish policy of stirring up factions and agitators, and secret lending for weapons production, to prepare for wars. Readers here might think whether 'Balance of Power' is desirable or possible, and whether attacking a leader is sensible policy.
19th Century. c. 1800-1900   “In the post-Napoleonic 19th century the Rothschilds were leading a wide-spectrum assault on Christendom—politically, economically and religiously. The Rothschilds funded attacks on several Christian monarchies on the continent in 1848; they funded Britain's attack on Russia in the Crimean War of 1856; Disraeli deprived Russia of its victory over Turkey during the Balkan war in 1878; Rothschilds continuously undermined the Tsar's personal wealth in the bond market; Rothschilds drained the rising economic power of the US in a Civil War that began in 1860 and killed 400,000 Americans, i.e., European white men.”—Oona Craig, from Youtube. Eastern and central Europe and Russia, the Ottoman Empire, the Mediterranean and Egypt and north-west India, Greece and Armenia in the 19th century cannot be understood without some view of Jews. Conversely, Jews do what they can to obscure the issues, as any history texts prove; it's painful to consider the waste of effort by students at all levels of the 19th century world.

1815  London Stock Exchange coup by Nathan Rothschild after Wellington's victory at Waterloo. [ Important note: This event cannot be quite as simple as is usually implied. Given only about 24 hours advance on official news, the entire process of publicising the hypothetical defeat, giving it apparent official weight, irreversibly buying up the (presumably) gilt-edged securities and bonds, must have been extremely hasty. The victory was on a Sunday. Travel in those days was not swift. Either agents had to be used, or—my guess—Jew-friendly government officials, of the Thomas Love Peacock type, collaborated.
      It occurs to me that the abolition of duels soon after might have a connection with Jewish frauds ]

1826   Murder of William Morgan by Freemasons is worth noting.
    [ Well-known artistic references to Freemasonry are found in Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, Edgar Allan Poe, Jules Verne. Poe and Verne post-dated Morgan, and perhaps suggest that commentary on secret societies became more obscure—or perhaps that there was progressive emergence from obscurity, unwelcome to members. In France, though, Freemasonry was well-known after the 'Revolution', because of its Jewish-Masonic opposition to the Roman Catholic church.
    Freemasonry looks like the front-runner of secret societies, a conjunction of Jews and non-Jews, notably with nationally-located 'Super Lodges', though perhaps 'Common Purpose' is replacing it at lowish levels. Reference books on religions, and legal systems, deal with such things cautiously. From a power point of view, secret societies are obviously important and potentially dangerous. They can be considered as religions, if this comparison is felt to be desirable, but with a selected membership, a steeply-graded internal hierarchy, and aims which the membership were anxious to keep secret. ]


1826-1832   Snapshot of changes in England, in effect aimed at promoting 'Jewish interests' including founding of 'London University' (1826), repeal of the Test Act, and the repeal of the Corporation Act (1828) and passing of the Reform Bill in 1832. These are often regarded wrongly as anti-superstition and pro-democracy, rather than weakening Christianity without weakening Jew superstition, and increasing Jewish control of voting. London Clubs, in the days of small electorates, extensively straddle this time period; partly because they took much time to build.

1830   William Cobbett, Rural Rides collected and published together, after about ten years' travel since 1821 of England (not Wales, not Scotland). [ Cobbett has references to Jews, though these are suppressed: for example, the Oxford Companion to English Literature, a supposedly definitive reference work, does not mention or discuss them. The only time I recall a mention is in the online Occidental Observer, June 20, 2018, by Andrew Joyce. I recommend persons trying to get a feel for land tenure and finance in England—and much of the world—to read Cobbett, in conjunction with revisionist works on the Napoleonic Wars. ]

1831-1875   Cholera in London; 1849-1854 Snow publishes on water and cholera; 1858 'Great Stink'; Thames water system completed 1875. Not all progressive measures are as slow as the Reformation.

1836   First Act for the Suppression of Thuggee and Dacoity suggests a parallel with Jews. Here's an extract from a blurb for a book on the Thuggee cult (note the Jew-like conflation of religion with membership): [... For generations the Thugs went almost completely unchecked. The British government, calmly tallying "misadventures," remained unconcerned because Thugs killed almost no Europeans. As for the natives themselves, Thugs terrorized peasants & bribed rajahs & landowners to ignore or protect them. Thugs were often of the Brahman caste. When they were arrested, they were almost invariably released for lack of evidence. It was as if the Thugs (corrupted from thags, Hindustani for "deceivers") had managed to keep the country hypnotized. The Thug modus operandi was to assume the guise of peaceful travelers. Joining parties with their victims, they would charm them right up to the moment at which one designated Thug would seize a doomed man's wrists while another Thug would strangle him from behind with a noose of white or yellow silk—Kali's favorite colors. Sometimes talented Thugs would play the sitar & coax their victims into singing, the better to expose their throats for throttling. Not only did the Thugs kill without remorse but "with pleasure," as they confessed, sanctified by omens before & prayers afterward. Thug son succeeded Thug father in the family business. But even after as many as eleven generations had accumulated fortunes, Thugs & scions of Thugs went on doing their thing. Shrewd appraisers of rich victims, they carefully scouted out their targets. But they had no objection to the impromptu murder of a party of four—for as little as 20 gold pieces & a handful of rupees. Whatever drove the Thugs—probably a mixture of greed, blood lust & corrupted religious fervor—their energy & enterprise were astonishing. One boasted of 931 murders in a fruitful 40-year career. ...
    There's a 1959 b/w film made in Britain, The Stranglers of Bombay, on the Thugs and the cult of Kali. Jewish script. And a book with a similar title (1969). There are interesting other interpretations, for example that the whole idea of such a cult was a British-invented myth, and that there was a 'caste' of criminals.
    Oona Craig pointed out that a 1959-published book by Louis Zoul, Thugs and Communists (who also wrote The Communist Inferno), looks at the same issue. It may have been subtitled 'an exposition on the disastrous genetic effects of the Thugs and communists murdering, and the revelation of the spurious philosophic foundation of communism'. I haven't seen a single review; what I found online looks unimpressive—and doesn't mention Jew predation.]

    Other possible compare-and-contrast groups are Sicarii (Latin name for Jewish dagger killers), Gipsies (sometimes called 'Roma' to hide the origin), ethnic Chinese in south-East Asia, Armenians, Equites in Roman history, so-called Ulster Scottish or Ulster Scotch, and Brahmins—the whole of Hinduism, with specialised castes including warriors and merchants and peasants and 'untouchables', could be interpreted as a religion appropriate for a mega-tribe. Judaism's 'priests', ordinary Jews (and excluded 'goyim'), make a parasitic religion with no place for practical groups.

1837 Alexander McCaul (1799–1863), for many years Professor of Hebrew at King’s College London, "was one of the most prominent figures in 'The London Society for Promoting Christianity amongst Jews'. In 1837, he published a formidable attack against the Talmud entitled The Old Paths. Having spent ten years as a missionary in Warsaw, McCaul knew Jewish texts and Jewish life intimately. He succeeded in converting several fascinating figures, especially Stanislaus Hoga, a Polish Jew, who would eventually forge a new understanding of Christianity based on a fusion with Judaism. The most significant Jewish response to The Old Paths was by the 'father of the Eastern European Haskalah' (the Jewish Enlightenment) Isaac Baer Levinsohn, an outspoken critic of the rabbis and Talmudic law, who now set out to defend them, and in doing so, offered invaluable reflections on the meanings of newly constructed modern Jewish identity." [Quoted from notes to a lecture. McCaul is an obscure figure; no prizes for guessing why.]

1838   Chartism and Chartists and People's Charter 'principally working men'. ‘The Charter included universal suffrage [i.e. votes], annual parliaments, stipendiary members [i.e. paid, so that rich people wouldn't have an automatic advantage], vote by [secret] ballot, equal representation, and abolition of the property requirement for MPs. The Chartists disappeared as a party about 1849.’ Quoted from Brewer's Phrase and Fable, first published 1870, but in numerous different versions subsequently. I quote that to show it's not entirely trivial to find what they said they wanted.
    Probably the whole point of Marxism and similar Jewish movements was to retain hold of finance money. Note the date Chartism was deemed extinct. The leading advocate of this view is Miles W Mathis.


Jews in China
1839   Opium Wars (and see 1860 below)   provide a test case of the economics of war and of group interests. The wars are always referred to as Anglo-Chinese, or other variants. This deliberately conceals Jewish motivations by pretending they were British. To this day, few Britons or Americans separate the two interests: 'American policy in Iraq', 'This country has been good to me", 'the British armed services' are just a few variants of the theme. My reading is that Jews promoted these wars, to make money from drugs and also to seize loot: see for example information on the Peking Old Summer Palace. Would it have occurred to Britons as a whole to behave so barbarically? I don't know, but the fact seems to be that the gains, if spread over the whole country would not have been worth the effort: it was only the greed and malice of a small group, enabled to use the assets of an entire country, that led to the wars.
    On China being yet another Jewish-controlled state, see China and the Jews by 'Lasha Darkmoon'. including material from Kevin Macdonald and Franklin Ryckaert. Not just on 21st century China, and the opium wars, but earlier times, on Jews in China itself, Kaifeng Jews, at least to the Middle Ages. Not very strong on sources and evidence, though Arnold Leese's article inGothic Ripples (#49, 28th February, 1949) seems to have provided much of it. Jewish names include ROTHSCHILD | Elias David Sassoon | Silas Aaron Hardoon | E.D. Sassoon & Co | Edward Ezra | Jacob Borodin (aka Grusenberg) | Trebitsch Lincoln (British MP) | BK Galen (aka Chesin) | Skidelski | Gekker | Koslowsky | Snamensky | MD Lashewitz | WN Levitscher | A Joffe | R. Haas | JB Rajchman | Ben Kizer. And 'Chinese' names: Ai, Shi, Gao, Jin, Li, Zhang, and Zhao.

1840   Moses Montefiore, 1784-1885, usually described as a 'philanthropist', travelled overseas on a number of occasions. One was in 1840, the Damascus affair in 1840. He intervened in a trial of a ritual murder of Padre Tomaso. Probably there is a pattern (including 'Jack the Ripper' in east London, and the murder of Mary Phagan by Leo Franck in 1913 in the USA) of demonstrating influence by getting away with murder. [ Bertrand Russell when young visited Montefiore's house. Montefiore's diaries in English translation are online, though I haven't read them. ]

1843   Bruno Bauer's Die Judenfrage published in German. More or less transliterable as Brown Farmer's The Jewish Question. Described as a 'student of Hegel' and a theologian, and also a tutor of Marx. I'm not claiming detailed familiarity with Bauer's work. However, this book, and its title, started some of the interminable dishonest wranglings about so-called Jews. Marx with typical imitativeness wrote on this subject the following year. 1848's 'revolutions' may have led Bauer to update this book, but I don't know if he did. Bauer wrote before Germany was unified; it's slightly misleading to describe the people as 'German'. [ Similar titles on the Jewish Question or Jewish problem include works by: Wilhelm Marr, Heinrich von Treitschke, and Eugen Dühring (1879-1881), Justinas Pranaitis (1892, The Talmud Unmasked in Latin; followed by many translations, including English—but only in 1939. Here's the American edition, published by E. N. Sanctuary, New York), Theodor Fritsch (1893 Antisemiten Katechismus was 'vastly popular' though I can't find an online version; a later book, in English translation as The Riddle of Jews' Success is online, and Goldwin Smith (Regius Professor of Modern History at Oxford, 1892-1894 though this brief description is misleading). Houston Stewart Chamberlain's works include The Foundations of the Nineteenth Century (1899). It's possible his views on Aryans were intended to help unite whites. It's possible he was part of a move to help unite Germans, and to bolster Anglo-Jews against Germans. Or simply be truthful. You choose! ]

1845 Death of Andrew Jackson. President 1829-1837. Was he a hero, opposing banks? Here's Miles Mathis (in eust.pdf, on Eustace Mullins): [ ‘ ... the alternate media now follows the plan of [Mullins'] whitewash, selling Jackson as an enemy of the Jewish bankers. He wasn't. History has been flipped. I have shown the Jacksons were probably crypto-Jews themselves, being linked by marriage to many of these families. The bank that Jackson destroyed was the Bank of the US, not the Federal Reserve—which didn't exist at that time. Once the BUS was destroyed, it could be replaced by private banking. It was these banks, pushed by wealthy Jews, that became the “National” banks for the rest of the 19th century. I have seen only one place unflipping this history, and that is Larouche's EIR ['Executive Intelligence Review']. ... those guys ... fail to include the most salient points and central characters. For instance, the raft of papers ... in 2012 lead you away from people like Johann Jakob Astor and Albert Gallatin and toward people like Aaron Burr and Martin van Buren. Burr and van Buren were scum, but they weren't the top scum at the time’ ]

very approx. 1850-1900 Romantic or Small nations and Nationalism. [ Nations, as small groups, are usually presented in a Jew-free way by dishonest historians. But probably the publicised movement for romantic nationalism was part of Jewish ideology of the time. Jews could present themselves as a small nationalistic oppressed blood-linked ancient group, entitled, just as small oppressed European nations presumably were, to power and territory. Naturally, this ideology was thrown away as soon as Jew priorities changed. ]

1850 Already by the 1850s, Jewish ownership of news publication was the majority. I haven't been able to relocate the exact quotation; but clearly this is relevant to the concealment of events in for example India, the Opium Wars, the Congo, Russia, and South Africa.
    [ Here is 'Guest', April 8, 2017, 10:19 am, in the OccidentalObserver:
It is worth noting that both The Times and The Daily Telegraph were under the ownership of Joseph Moses Levy from 1856 to 1928. The DT was founded by Colonel Arthur B Sleigh in 1855 and his paper was printed by Levy who already owned The Times. After only one year of operation and unable to pay Levy’s print bill, the Colonel was forced to sell the DT to Levy. Thus, during the most significant period in British history, in terms of Jewish propaganda, two of the major London papers, The Times (the ‘quality’ newspaper) and the Daily Telegraph (the cheaper tabloid) were used as central ‘clearing houses’ for this unquestioned propaganda.
I'm uncertain if this is in fact true; there may be confusion of the Times with Sunday Times: Jewish secrecy and deception come into play, and it's difficult to verify details of Jewish propaganda control, since (for example) company laws on disclosure vary. The Times was regarded—this is the received view—as serious and reliable, as many people perhaps still view the BBC.]

1852 William Gladstone vs Benjamin Disraeli. Possibly the earliest British explicitly deficit-financed Budget: proposed by Disraeli, opposed by Gladstone.

1858   Government of India Act and the neglect of overseas possessions by economists. [ Here's a write-up, I think by an Immigrant into Britain: In 1858, the British Crown bailed out and nationalised the most powerful company in human history. A company that had a standing army of 280,000 men, which it used to enslave a sixth of humanity and rule over an area in excess of 5 million km2. In fact, such was the power and influence of the British East India Company that even the Acts of Union of 1707 that merged the Kingdoms of England and Scotland was only made possible by bribing Scottish MPs with company shares. The East India Company was a behemoth – its power stemming from its legislated monopoly over all international trade to and from India, culminating in 15% of all British exports having to go through the Company. However, the Indian Mutiny of 1857, which was caused by the Company's bigoted policies, almost brought down Britain's colonial experiment in South Asia, and served as a warning to halls of Westminster. It was then understood the danger of an all-powerful corporation controlling the levers of power and the need for legislative oversight. Therefore, the Government of India Act of 1858 represented the first major corporate monopoly crackdown. ]

1860   Opium, Jews, China, and Britain Scroll down to 'Boxer Rebellion', Opium Wars, Sassoons, destruction of Chinese historical artefacts. Many of these are now in the hands of ghoulish Jewish 'collectors'. [From about 1830, the Sassoons, who had been thrown out of Baghdad, used the British army and navy to force opium on China; 1859 marked a climax, in which opium chests were thrown into rivers—very likely in imitation of the American revolution, and just as the Vietnamese later published a 'Declaration of Independence'. In retaliation, Palmerston ordered the destruction of Yuanmingyuan, an area of Peking/Beijing, translated as 'The Summer Palace' or 'Garden of Perfection and Light'. This period was the infancy of archaeology; I don't personally know how accurate are the claims made for 5,000 years of Chinese historical evidence having been destroyed, and over a million imperial objects are estimated to have been taken from the site: many of these are now scattered around the world, in private collections and public museums. However, in a period of about fifty years China was largely destroyed. Note that Rumsfeld, a Jew living n the USA, made jokes about Iraqi artefacts, from the 'cradle of civilization', being destroyed.
    It's often said by Jews that 'Europe' plundered the world. The Opium Wars show how doubtful this interpretation is: Jews benefited, but whether Britain would have gone to war over opium seems more doubtful. The Jews made personal fortunes, but, spread over the whole population of Britain, that would have been a small prize.
    Note that one of the events supposedly leading to this destruction was two claimed murders; two 'unidentifiable' bodies were part of the evidence. This sounds like a false flag operation.]


1861-1865   USA 'Civil War'. Here's a link to a book review on the Civil War which, even though written with a Southern States perspective, and full of post-1945 invective against 'Communists', still fails to identify Jews. And here's a comment on the origin of the 'War Between the States', the other formulation of the 'Civil War', assuming different arrangements of territory: Lincoln denied the Constitutional right of the southern states to lawfully secede from the union. Well into the war—and for propaganda purposes—the "reason" was switched to emancipation of slaves. (Lincoln was quoted as saying, "If I could preserve the union without freeing one slave, I would do it.")
      An Outline of the Jewish Conspiracy in Chapter 19 of Which Way Western Man? by William G. Simpson: European bankers, looking on from afar, saw what a rich harvest they could reap if only the growing tension between the North and the South could be brought to open conflict. [Gertrude M Coogan] records that “the American Civil War was planned in London in 1857”—four years before the first guns were fired. {n 219} “Certain bankers,” she continues, “made an agreement that the Paris branch of one group would support and finance the South, and the British branch of the same group would take the similar role for the North.” Behind both was the House of Rothschild. In the North, it was represented by a Jew known to history as “August Belmont”; {n 220} in the South by his uncle Senator John Slidell of Louisiana, a New Yorker who was Jewish on his father’s side. His financial partner was Judah Benjamin, Secretary of the Confederacy during the War, another Jew and a close friend of Disraeli. According to the Jewish Encyclopaedia (Vol. III, p. 30) Benjamin “was generally described as ‘the brains of the Confederacy,’” though it adds “particularly during his incumbency of the secretaryship of War, he was extremely unpopular.” Both Benjamin and Slidell “were agents of the Rothschilds and obtained Rothschild Bloc funds for the South during the Civil War (via the d’Erlanger banks).” {n 221}
    Propaganda pushed the issue of slavery to the fore, but the actual purpose behind it all was to get both sides loaded down with a mountain of debt, and to exploit the desperate exigencies which must arise in the struggle, to drive both sides to accept the same money system that the House of Rothschild had already fastened on England and the Continent. The creation and issuing of money would then be given to a “national” bank, and money, instead of being issued free, on the credit of the whole country, would be issued, every cent of it, as a national debt, secured on the taxes and solvency of the entire people, and yielding interest forever until the day it was paid. That is, the purpose of the bankers was to bleed the vast productivity of the whole American people. {n 222}


1862   Little-known expulsion: 17th December 1862, during the American Civil War, Union general and future president Ulysses S. Grant took the strongest action against Jews in United States history, expelling all Jews from his region of control - comprising areas of Tennessee, Mississippi, and Kentucky, under General Order No. 11

1865   End of the “US Civil War”
[ ‘The victorious power’s intention was a trial, with the intended result of hanging the defeated senior political and military leadership. Apparently realization at some level of the utterly fraudulent nature of this ‘case’ made the plan collapse. But one camp and its rail link, Andersonville, had special notoriety. The documented history shows the intent of the US government to have executed the entirety of the South’s political and military leadership; Robert E Lee and Jefferson Davis, amongst others, for ‘crimes against humanity’. Books and journals of the time include such expressions as ‘camps’, ‘cattle cars’, planned ‘systematic’ mass murder, ‘slaughter pen’, cries of ‘never forget’, accusations of leather wallets) made from the skin of the ‘murdered’ prisoners.’ (Modified from 'T', in TheOccidentalObserver, 22 July 2017) ]

1867   Marx & Engels published Das Kapital Vol. 1. From a revisionist viewpoint, this book adopted Jewish eschatology: a 'Messiah' would bring paradise. But most Jewish material is firmly and deliberately suppressed: there's nothing on financing wars, financing slavery, history of Jews, power against goyim, Rothschild and 1814, the Opium Wars and Jews (then recent), and so on. [ The 'Labour Theory of Value' was more or less taken from Ricardo, and takes no account of basic human biology, or raw materials, or geographical circumstances. Probably Marx accepted the idea after watching Engels' factory workers in Salford, and doing simple sums about pay rates per hour, but omitting buildings, sales, insurance, quality of the output, technical change, and so on.
    Marx's Jewish associates, notably Rothschilds, must have blandly told him they intended to buy up this and that, and expand; the idea that Marx showed great insight into expansion of finance and capital is simple nonsense: he'd been told about it by jews in a position to know.
    Hegel's hyper-elaborate idealist philosophy of history (ideas with priority over reality; plus 'the Absolute', possibly taken from Catholicism—as in e.g. Newman '... Holy Church in her sacraments and her hierarchical appointments, will remain even to the end of the world, only a symbol of those heavenly facts which fill eternity. ...') played little part in Marx until later, after the Manifesto when Marx lived in England and took up, or mentioned, the thesis - antithesis - synthesis dogma. Marx's absurd idea that 'all history is a class war' (inserted no doubt for 'divide and rule' reasons), his economic determinism, dialectical materialism, surplus value, the omission of definitions of 'capitalism' and legalities, all play a part analogous to psychoanalytical terms in Freud, and theological terms in medieval scholasticism, providing scope for endless wrangling, and material for pamphlets and lectures, of the 'bullshit baffles brains' type. Marx is not important as truth, but as an example of constructing lies, and the use of power to impose them. Probably the only constant is his elision of Jewish finance. More on 'Communism' and Marxism (Click left-arrow to return here). ]


1868 '... the campaign of defamation kicked off in 1868 by Heinrich Graetz in Germany three years before Germany was unified. ... anti-German narrative ... Much material about this public hatred for Germany can be found in any large library. ...' comment by 'Bo Sears' in the Occidental Observer. (See below, 1914, for the huge Jewish-backed 'Social Democrat' party in Germany). There were parallel campaigns against Germany and Russia in Britain, which most people simply absorbed without comment.

1870   First Vatican Council, propositions “reprobated, proscribed, and condemned” by Pius IX in 1864. J. McCabe's description of The Syllabus. Probably this event represented Jews (and Freemasons) increasing or regaining their control of the Roman Catholic Church.

1871   The Paris ‘Commune’ is one of many events which can't be fitted into any Jew-naive worldview, but falls into place with Jew-awareness. It's agonising to contemplate the snoozing indolence of Victorian Americans and Britons, completely misunderstanding this warning event.
    [ Here's an account by Arthur Kemp, from his reprinted translation of the book by Marx, which Kemp also introduces: The Commune briefly ruled Paris from 18 March until 28 May 1871, after being elected as the city council. Acting as a lightning conductor for socialist radicals from Poland to Italy, the Commune quickly dissolved into the usual "dictatorship of the proletariat" and instituted what can now in hindsight be recognised as the more usual trappings of Communist regimes: it began stripping away civil liberties and creating state enforcement agencies to implement its decrees by terror and coercion.
    Among its rules was a "Decree on Hostages"—in terms of which any person could be arrested, imprisoned, and tried, becoming "hostages of the people of Paris." Hundreds, if not thousands, were murdered in this manner, including a number of prominent religious leaders. In addition, the Commune created a "Committee of Public Safety," which was given extensive powers to hunt down and imprison its self-identified enemies. Freedom of the press was suppressed, and finally, as the Communists faced military defeat, they burned down many famous buildings in the city in revenge, including many priceless architectural gems. It is estimated that up to 20,000 people died during the Commune.
]


1873   Livre du Kahal by J Brafman (published in Odessa; translated into French by T.P.), Material to study Judaism in Russia, and its influence on populations among which it exists. One of the first, or first modern, explorations of the Kahal, apparently the organisation exclusively for Jews and Jewish arrangements as against everyone else. Hair-raising reading.
    Also called 'Kehilla' or 'Kehillah'. As applied in the USA, this site is one of a few describing what happened: Kehillah description by a Biblical site.

1876   Bulgarian Atrocities by the 'Turks'. Probably this was a manifestation of crypto-Jews who ran Turkey. Usually presented in the 'west' as massacre of Christians in Bulgaria by Muslims. Probably Jew-instigated, in fact. Probably similar to the Armenian genocide about 30 years later.

Moss-Booth Salvation Army
Moss-Booth of the 'Salvation Army'
1878   Founding of the Salvation Army by 'General Booth'. Died in 1912. According to Hilaire Belloc: 'Charles Kingsley ... [and] Moss-Booth, the founder of the Salvation Army. .. both owed their genius and nearly all their physical appearance to Jewish mothers.' Interesting to speculate on the non-Christian aspects of the Salvation Army. Probably this was part of the hidden Jewish anti-Christian movement, which included subverting the 'rationalist' movement, support for Islam, the omission of the more savage aspects of savages, and support for oddities—in the USA, the Scofield Bible and modern US Zionist televangelists illustrate the same point. A little-known secret movement was the Skeleton Army which Wikipedia says was started in 1880 in Whitechapel (in East London, targeted for Jewish immigration from eastern Europe). Probably similar to Jewish-funded thugs at the time of the Boer Wars, and Cable Street thugs and modern street and university campus thugs paid by Jews to disrupt white/ nationalist/ humanitarian groups.

1879   Isis Unveiled: A Master-Key to the Mysteries of Ancient and Modern Science and Theology nominally by Helena Blavatsky (of the 'Theosophical Society') seems to have been a 19th century Jewish intrusion, aimed against 19th century Christianity, without acknowledging the likelihood that Jewish writings had been manufactured much earlier as essential to what became known as Christianity. Assembled from writings of anthopologists, explorers, colonists who had recorded beliefs from around the world, with Jewish comments.

1880s and 1890s   Socialism in England and its cryptic perversion by Jews. Short comments from H. G. Wells' The World of William Clissold and Experiment in Autobiography describing the heading-off of discussions about currency (as 'currency cranks'), and heading-off of discussions about expropriation (needing a 'competent receiver'), and nationalisation, presumably by Jews in the pay of banks, in the days when the pound sterling was the principal world currency.

1880s-1914   Many assassinations (see below) over this period are known to have been by Jews; probably the general censorship has understated these, and the corresponding corruption and perversions of legal, police, and spy systems.

1880   Birth of Jabotinsky, a typical fanatic who believed himself to be a Jew. Students of Jews will simplify their task by ignoring the rhetoric, and looking at the apparently genetic tendency to deceive 'goyim'.

1882   Ersten Internationalen Antijüdischen Kongress held in Dresden, 'the Saxon capital'. Little-known event, apparently two days only. I'm even unsure if the title claimed it was the first congress. September 11-12, 1882. Monday and Tuesday; perhaps it was cut short. [ ONODY, GÉZA VON. 19th c. Hungarian statesman. He launched the Tisza-Eszlar ritual murder prosecution. Later, he joined with ADOLF STOCKER of Germany and his fellow Hungarian, VICTOR von ISTOCZY, to organize the first International Anti-Jewish Congress at Dresden in 1882. Von Onody was widely recognized as one of the great orators of his day. —Historical Review Press: AntiZion: A Survey of Commentary On Organized Jewry by Leading Personalities Through the Ages compiled by William Grimstad.
    (This 'might explain why the Jews controlling WWII had their clueless Judeomasonic shabez goyim bomb Dresden into smithereens' [Oona Craig in a Youtube comment], and the date of the 9/11 demolition fake.) ]


1882   Union Générale crash. Non-Jewish bank crash in France.

1884   'Manhood Suffrage' in England and Wales. I suspect (perhaps someone might follow up this line of thought) that the policy, and even the vocabulary (omitting 'British'), was part of the strategy to immigrate so-called Jews into Britain and give them the vote. Those entitled to vote seem to have been covered by the '1867 householder and lodger franchise' perhaps planned to include future 'Jewish' immigration.

1884   Arnold Toynbee (not Arnold Joseph Toynbee) invented, or is credited with inventing, the phrase 'industrial revolution' in a lecture series. One of a whole slew of 'revolutions', the phrase no doubt traces to the French Revolution and 1848. 1750-1850 is or was generally regarded as the period of maximum change, with cities' populations, output of coal and iron, food production, railways and ships as markers. To this day the word 'revolution' suggests chaotic upheavals, excluding and hiding long-term planning and calculation.

1887   Merchandise Marks Act passed in Britain, notably to mark German products 'Made in Germany'. Similar laws must have been widespread; Switzerland for example has an arrow motif which I'm told indicates some sort of excellence. As far as I know, there are no laws indicating Jewish ownership as yet, though many food products, I think mainly in the USA, have obscure marks to show some Rabbinical incantations have been spoken.

1888   Professor Telemachus Thomas Timayenis, a Greek in New York whose two brothers also had traditional Greek first names, published a clutch of books, under his own new imprint, Minerva Books, which had an owl as what's now called a logo. Two of these were The American Jew and The Original Mr Jacobs. They seem to have been based on French sources: his books can be regarded as precursors of Belloc's post-'Great War' book, The Jews.

1893   In France, the Compagnie Universelle du Canal Interocéanique, formed in 1879 to dig the Panama Canal under de Lesseps, an engineer, made itself bankrupt in 1889. Jean Jaurès was unanimously elected to head an enquiry, starting in 1893: 'the power of money has succeeded in taking control of the organs of opinion and in falsifying their source; which is to say, in the area of public information, falsifying the national conscience.' (Jaurès was a socialist, in the genuine sense. He was assassinated in 1914, probably because he opposed the coming World War). The Panama Scandal and its Rothschild connection penetrated deeply into French consciousness because of the large number of impoverished investors. It's hard to fix a date for the 'Panama Scandal' or Scandals, and hard to determine what happened, and what the Rothschild influence was. It's hard because the events are suppressed by Jewish media. These scandals were followed by the Dreyfus Affair, and publicised by Edouard Drumont.
    [ Oscar Wilde's play An Ideal Husband has references to a canal fraud. Wilde's friend Lord Alfred Douglas edited Plain English, a weekly review published by the North British Publishing Co., which published an exchange of letters taken from a German volume; and translated: 16th June, 1647. Cromwell: 'In return for financial support will advocate admission of Jews to England: This however impossible while Charles living. Charles cannot be executed without trial, adequate grounds for which do not at present exist. Therefore advise that Charles be assassinated, but will have nothing to do with arrangements for procuring an assassin, though willing to help in his escape.' 12th July, 1647. 'Will grant financial aid as soon as Charles removed and Jews admitted. Assassination too dangerous. Charles shall be given opportunity to escape: His recapture will make trial and execution possible. The support will be liberal, but useless to discuss terms until trial commences.' ]

1894   Dreyfus Affair in France. Dreyfus was a Jew, working in French officialdom. For at least a century he was regarded as a shameful example of the horror of White 'anti-Semitism': all open-minded people regarded the Dreyfus case as shocking and deplorable. The moral viewpoint was that Dreyfus was part of the new world of accuracy and morals, like the suffragettes. However, Dreyfus may have been just another Jewish fraud, perhaps designed to promote war with Germany, or to split Europe. An anonymous article Dreyfus gives some background, though I should caution that parts of this story may have been fed by 'intelligence' types to the public.
    'Josh G' who also is 'Daddieuhoh' in Miles Mathis' site gives evidence that both Dreyfus and Drumont were fakes. But 'Josh G' also says 'Jews' willingly sacrifice their sons and daughters in countless wars and conflicts.. which of course is far less than honest.
    Josh G summarises his view of the Dreyfus Affair: (here's my cut-down version):- [1] Blackwashing criticism of Jewish bankers and industrialists and their growing political and economic power. ... by putting all criticism of Jews, both legitimate and ridiculous, under the label of anti-Semitism. Then they ... show[ed] how this poor, innocent, honorable patriot [Dreyfus] was wrongly convicted ... many undoubtedly felt badly about their criticism of Jews after they found out Dreyfus was innocent ... helping to protect these wealthy Jews from future criticism and also to bolster the political power and influence of the Jewish-supported Third Republic and disempower and delegitimize the remaining Monarchist and Catholic ... power centers of France. ... [2] The Dreyfus affair seems to have served as an impetus for the modern Zionist movement. [which] used the Dreyfus affair to legitimize and justify its goals. ... [and] Zionists needed to bring anti-Semitic sentiment to a boil in order to cajole as many European Jews as possible to move to Israel. ... [3] The blackwashing of anti-Semitism discussed above in point number 1 gained increased important in the wake of the Union Generale and, especially, the Panama scandals. [3a] the Dreyfus affair also served as a distraction. And it was a major distraction. [4] Divide and conquer: the affair is described as nearly tearing France in two, with battle lines between drawn between the Dreyfusards and the anti-Dreyfusards. [5] Make lots of money: the newspapers were owned (almost?) entirely by wealthy Jews. [6] ... the film industry biggy-packed on the Dreyfus affair,... [7] General Georges Boulanger. ... was chosen to lead the Catholic/Monarchist/nationalist/traditional opposition and help bring it crashing down. 'Daddieuhoh' suggests Boulanger was comparable to Trump at the end of 2016, a set-up character, clearly a disappointment to his electors in the USA. (But 'revanchism' - something like 'revengeism against Germany' - was not Trump's message).

1897   Jacob Schiff in New York continues vast Jewish emigration into the USA. Among other things, including manipulating Japan into war against Russia, and planning US war against Japan later. Jacob Schiff's vast influence on the USA is a detailed piece from the tomatobubble website.

1898   Sir Richard Burton's orientalist book The Jew, The Gypsy, and El Islam includes passages on Jewish ritual murder. (see 1936, 1938)

1899-1902   Boer War (arguably) was the first external event in which Jewish influence after the re-admission of Jews was noticed by many Britons.
    Henry Hamilton Beamish (who fought in the Boer War) was profoundly influenced by that war and spent the rest of his life opposing Jews, for example in the 'Britons Publishing Society'. 'Britons Publishing Society' continued after 1945; it published for example Wing-Commander Leonard Young's Deadlier than the H-Bomb' in 1956. (Young's booklet can be downloaded as a PDF from e.g. from here). These books tend to be over-religious, too Britain-centred, and, apart from banking, not informed on Jewish frauds, as the title of Young's book suggests. The 'Left Book Club' (founded 1936) may have been a Jewish propaganda response, with the tiny 'Right Book Club' as controlled pseudo-opposition. Hobson on Imperialism, and Belloc on Jews, were two others influenced by the Boer War. (Note that the word 'boer' is similar to the German word 'bauer', a farmer).
    Gold from South Africa was more important than other goldrushes, in California and Australia. It was underplayed (and the Klondike goldrush may have been a diversionary fake). This ‘War had the biggest impact on the world of all the wars, because it funded communism in Russia, WW1, WW2, and is still funding the one world order to this day.’—'faniefaze2'. As would be expected, there is a Freemasonry link with Afrikaners and the Broederbond vs Boers. ‘Jan Smuts was a British-trained Cape Dutch Afrikaner from the Cape and made a "Boer general" to create the impression that he was a Boer.’—faniefaze2

1900   Possibly the first split within the British Labour Party—as representing Britons, vs. a front for Jews.
    [ John Burns, Labour MP for Battersea, led the dockworkers' strike of 1889. In February 1900, Burns spoke about the 2nd Boer War: "Wherever we examine, there is the financial Jew operating, directing, inspiring the agencies that have led to this war. ... The trail of the financial serpent is over this war from beginning to end." The British army, Burns said, had traditionally been the "Sir Galahad of History." But in Africa it had become the "janissary of the Jews."—Janissaries were whites, taken away when young, to act as thugs for Muslims ].

1900   Jewish immigration into London's East End. Includes comment by H G Wells & Kevin MacDonald on Churchill in Parliament filibustering a bill to control immigration. [Plus note on crime. Much of the east end of London was populated by 'Cockneys'; the East End was subsequently targeted by Jews, in the same way that Germany and Sweden became targets.
    Opinions differ as to when the Jewish white genocide plans were established. I'd guess that common Jews from the east met a strange world: running water, flush toilets, clean streets, motor traffic, well dressed people, underground trains, freeish women, huge public buildings, rentable housing, uniformed police, thriving shipping and docks; big green public parks. Their first thoughts were presumably "look what they've got, and we haven't" and it's hard to believe they thought in terms of bringing millions of Africans in and displacing whites. BUT the entrenched wealthy parasitic Jews may have had a different outlook, as Israel Cohen's 1912 book suggests. The First World War (1914-1918 British dating) slaughtered enough Britons to make 1920s and 1930s housing cheaper, and may well have been behind the feeling that war is good for Jews.]

1900   As planned movements of Jews increased, their characteristics were noted, but censored. Criminologists and Psychologists (insofar as they existed): '... By 1900 it was changed to "psychopathic personality." ... characterized by a lack of regard for the moral or legal standards in the local culture...' [I've found no evidence this was investigated as a Jewish phenomenon, as that hypothesis would no doubt be censored, just as facts about the Jewish 'Jack the Ripper' were censored. However, the symptoms, such as 'Authoritarian', 'Secretive', 'Incapable of real human attachment', 'Goal of enslavement', 'Contemptuous of those who seek to understand them', 'Unable to feel remorse or guilt', read exactly like Jewish attitudes and characteristics.]
    2015-ish: Looking at public Youtube videos on sociopaths, narcissists (covert and overt) etc it's striking how the speakers miss out anything to do with income and assets, pretending these things are unimportant. It would not surprise me if most of the vaguely-described characteristics ('haughty', 'over-bearing', 'self-important', 'think they're special', 'grandiose', 'manipulative', 'personality disorder', 'true feelings') apply to Jews, though probably Jewish-owned outfits would censor them.

1902   Royal Commission on Alien Immigration

1905   From 1905 onward, the revolutionary movement [Jews in Russia] was killing between 10 and 20 people a day.
    Some were innocent; others were government employees at some level. Not only did the Duma (or parliament) think this was acceptable, they both praised it and protested against any attempt to punish these terrorists. All told, some 10,000 Russians were killed by revolutionary violence throughout the 19th and early 20th centuries... Rather than being victims of pogroms, Russia's Jews were some of the best armed human beings on the planet. They demanded total freedom from all taxation and military service and, in exchange, would not only finance the Red revolt domestically, but act as its primary infantry in the cities of western Russia such as Kiev, Mogilev or Odessa... The Myth of the Pogroms: How the Press Covered Up the Massacre of Christians Matthew R. Johnson, 2016

1905   Aliens Act in Britain

1905-1908 Georges Sorel: Italian language essays finally published with an introduction as Réflections sur la violence, translated into many languages, including English in the USA in 1914, and UK 1915. I'd guess Sorel was a Jew, in view of his support for Dreyfus, and interest in Marx, who seems to have dominated Sorel's mind despite his considerable range of interests, including technical matters. Sorel put emphasis on 'the class war' (singular).
    [ Bertrand Russell wrote '[Sorel] points out ... that Marx's theoretical economics remain very near to Manchesterism: the orthodox political economy of his youth ... Sorel [says] the really essential thing in Marx's teaching is the class war. Whoever keeps this alive is keeping alive the spirit of Socialism much more truly than those who adhere to the letter of Social-Democratic orthodoxy. [In 1867 I]t was natural that great hopes should be entertained as to what democracy would achieve. Marx, like the orthodox economists, imagined that men's opinions are guided by a more or less enlightened view of economic self-interest, or rather of economic class interest. A long experience of the workings of political democracy has shown that in this respect Disraeli and Bismarck were shrewder judges of human nature than either Liberals or Socialists...' This passage is typical of Russell's view of human nature; he never understood the effect of intensive Jewish propaganda and lies and false flags and psyops.
    Some readers liked Sorel, interpreting him simply as a proponent of war, just in time for 1914. (The translator into English was keen on war, and was killed I think in 1916).
    But the whole presentation of Sorel is Jew-naive, or of course Jew-censoring, as his material on the 'French Revolution', colonies, money and so on prove. I'm inserting this section because Kai Murros, a Finn, seems to have revived Sorel. A Youtube online shows him praising Oxford University (remember Professor Evans?), and talking in sound bites all taken from 'Marxist' jargon: 'Capitalism' with no analysis; nothing on the Fed and other Jew frauds; 'Trotskyist intellectual'; "human societies can't be experimented on!"; moral obligation to the 3rd world; Thesis and antithesis; "EU peace for all these years"; no mention of Jew funding for weaponry, and to thugs. ... Etc
    However, the issue of violence and military force is important, and needs analysis if there is to be successful opposition to Jewish evil. ]


1907   Financial panic of 1907 in the USA, the start of the process leading the the Federal Reserve in the whole of the USA.

1908   Examples of attempts around this time to come to grips with rising industrialism and militarism. All these authors failed to identify the risks from a ruthless anti-white secret elite, spread as an intersecting set across financial centres, committed to destruction of civilisation:–
  • 1897. Henry George. 'Progress and Poverty' looks at land tenure and taxation
  • 1902. J A Hobson. Imperialism (prompted by the Boer War) looks at empires, and has figures, but assumes imperial powers act as nations. He ignores the divisions within nations, which allow the costs of gaining assets to be offloaded onto ordinary people.
        It occurs to me that Lenin liked Hobson because he obscures the role of Jews. When you think about it, there's no obvious reason why such things as railways, farm equipment, roads, machinery should be gifted from an inventor to other countries. But Hobson confuses theft with presenting things to be paid for. The East India Company probably combined Jewish exploitation with trade, And Hobson's confusion remains, used by Jews to promote 'white guilt'.
  • 1908. Ralph Norman Angell Lane. The Great Illusion. Norman Angell maintained wars are loss-making. He seems to have understated the cruelties of war (so populations may be pauperised), and also the possibility of profiteering from wars. Very many people were trained to think they had a duty to lose by war, and assumed this duty would obtain even with arms manufacturers.
  • 1913. Baroness Bertha von Suttner. Cast Down Your Arms (Or 'Lay Down Your Arms').
  • 1914. Explosions in Britain attributed to suffragettes; targets included churches, libraries, and public glasshouses. I'd ask serious historians to consider the hypothesis that these explosions were carried out secretly by Jews, leaving behind false flag tokens—books, letters, 'clues'.
  • 1914. H N Brailsford. War of Steel and Gold: A Study of the Armed Peace. This book pre-dated the start of the Great War. Interesting observations, with shareholders in weapons company making money. But it falls short of a full evaluation.
As far as I know, Jews and their hosts are always spoken of, in the Jewish media and Jew-fearing academics, as though they make one unified object. One of the tasks of revisionism is to separate the two. In general, Jews support anything which profits them, irrespective of the effects on the hosts and any rivals the hosts believe in. For example, British India was faced with the question: "If it costs you money to run India, why not abandon or free it?"—to which the answer may well have been: "The British suckers lose, but Jews profit". A few decades later, many people still talk about "the U.S.A. in Vietnam", without asking the question: "How much money did Jews make from the invasion of Vietnam and genocide there? And how much did Americans lose?" Similarly later: some countries saw no reason to pay back debts incurred to Jews.

1909   Abdul Hamid II deposed by the Young Turks from the Ottoman Empire. This from today's viewpoint looks like a Jew 'revolution'. [This is Bertrand Russell in 1910 on women and the vote, where I found the name: Abdul Hamid, it is said, is about to publish his memoirs, and doubtless he will state that he was always ready to grant to the Armenians relief from every proved wrong, but as for an occasional massacre, that was necessary in the interests of the community, for citizens have no abstract right to life, and therefore ought only to be allowed to live if the Sultan judges that their lives are useful. In effect Russell blames Armenian massacres on Abdul Hamid.]

1912   Israel Cohen (a prolific writer; probably living in Britain) allegedly published A Racial Programme for the Twentieth Century containing material on eliminating Jews' competitor, the white races—if so, no copies are known to have survived. If you find one, treat it carefully and publicise it, also with care

1912   Titanic allegedly sunk. In fact the ship was the Olympic which had been substituted. This seems to have been ultimately an insurance fraud, like 9/11. The Olympic was known by insiders to be unsafe. The newly-invented radio was to be used in the rescue and a rescue ship was in wait; but, possibly intentionally, the survivors after the iceberg impact—or other accident, such as boiler room explosion—were left to die. This may or may not have been important: here's one view: '... Had J.P. Morgan NOT received the £12.5 million insurance settlement ... then J.P. Morgan's White Star Line would have had to file for bankruptcy. What chance would there have been for The Federal Reserve Act ... devised by J.P. Morgan, a Rothschild Agent?'

1912   Marconi Scandal. G K Chesterton thought this share-dealing event marked the distinctive change in Britain. (My interpretation: 19th century aristocracy with increasing democracy vs the state and plutocratic control, including of news).

1913   Formation of the 'Fed' ('Federal Reserve') in the USA.   Accompanied with assurances on stability, sound currency, and so on, as the name was intended to suggest—about as honestly as future assurances of War to End War, and (by Hart-Cellar and supporters) of stable population structure of the USA.   Congressman Charles A. Lindbergh Sr. said, in 1913, "From now on depressions will be scientifically created" and was a lifelong target of Jews.
    The 'Fed' institutionalised the dollar as a legally-backed, secretively and unaccountably profit-making device, with no audit, based on virtually worthless paper. This introduces the possibility of whole new sets of vested interests. If the Fed had been under American control, maybe outcomes would have been different. But profits could now be made by Jewish bankers, who had no loyalty to any country. Profits could be made by:-
    (1) Printing legal currency, borrowed by the government at interest. The real interest rate is huge, since the paper is worth nothing like face value
    (2) Increasing government borrowing as much as possible in yearly budgets, and so getting more interest
    (3) Causing inflation by encouraging low-value, make-work, fake think-tank, unproductive and wasteful activities
    (4) Lending selectively to fellow-Jews, for crime where secrecy is important/ buying-out industries for monopoly and control/ purchasing media or news sources for propaganda/ distorting markets/ inventing activities based on new science frauds/ fomenting wars to profit their companies while raising debt/ vicious activities overseas
    (5) Encouraging the spread of money-based economies in primitive societies as much as possible
    (6) Discouraging barter. The arguments in favour of convenient money, and against small-scale barter, are convincing, except in self-contained small communities. But in large-scale trade there is often no reason to use money. So anyone benefitting from the use of money can be expected to rage against barter. (For more on the implications of control of supply of money, see 'Understanding Jews' at the end of this piece).
In 1913 the 16th Amendment gave Congress the authority to enact an income tax. (This had been ruled unconstitutional in 1895; in 1913 sufficient States' votes permitted a new Amendment). The IRS may well have been formed with paper money in mind.
In October 1913 the 'Anti-Defamation League' was formed as a spin-off, or part of, 'B'nai B'rith': very likely to hide the murder of Mary Phagan by Leo Franck in August 1913. (He was convicted and sentenced to death; and ultimately lynched). Perhaps this organisation, still in existence, was linked to the formation of the 'Federal Reserve', since some mechanism for opposing criticism of Jews was obviously, to them, needed.
Note that worthless money is inherently likely to be unipolar, to have one source, in a way comparable to a country having only one capital city. This may be at the root of the perception that Russia, and Europe, and China, and India etc are essentially different from the USA, whatever view Jew 'elites' take.

1914  German Social Democratic Party '.. a vast institution that was staffed by more than 4,000 paid functionaries and 11,000 salaried employees, had 20,000,000 marks invested in business and published over 4,000 periodicals'. [H. Gruber, International Communism in the Era of Lenin quoted by 'Belgian' Jew Ralph Miliband in Marxism and Politics (Oxford University Press, 1977). Typical example of attribution of Jewish policies to Marx. 'Marxism' is a codeword for Jews. Bear in mind that, in Germany, Marx could be passed as non-Jewish.]
    This suggests that, pro rata by 1900 population size, 5,000 Jew-aware websites in the USA would change the whole atmosphere of the USA now: Jews and law, Jews and towns, Jews and business ownership, Jews and education, Medicine and Jews, Jews and crime, the nuclear industries and Jews, War crimes and Jews, Jews in Palestine, Information on Jewish publications, and so on.

1914  War Propaganda Bureau set up late 1914 in Britain. (Secretly-formed and based on newspaper distribution. It pre-dated both radio and television, which of course introduced new aspects and angles. Propagandist writers were salaried, and given functions vaguely similar to those of earlier Church of England vicars, and later BBC broadcasters. The Bryce Report (1915) was the first hugely influential collection of atrocity stories. The whole anonymous hack writing propaganda industry was invented. This was not exactly 'state propaganda' but rather propaganda for intersecting sets of interest groups, including arms manufacturers, Jews, foreign allies and temporary allies, tame union leaders etc. The USA's similar Committee on Public Information was set up in 1917)

1914   The 'Great War' begins. And ends the concept of 'Christendom'. And ends many Kaisers/ Tsars/ Czars in Europe, named after Caesar. And ends the Ottoman Empire.

1915  H G Wells  The Research Magnificent (Short extract from a story of an adventure round the world, including, here, Jews near Kiev holding illegal mortgages on most of south Russia. Includes an account of a so-called 'pogrom')

1916  Lloyd George on Jews and the Balfour Declaration (Testimony from Lloyd George about the part played by Jews in getting the USA into the First World War. Supporting testimony from e.g. J M Keynes. NB blackmailing of Woodrow Wilson is not mentioned. Note that Arthur Balfour was from Scotland; and Scotland was one of the few countries to have never expelled Jews. Balfour inherited a large sum at 21; I haven't checked in detail, but I'd guess he approved of Jews because of the Rothschild connection).

1916   new idea jews given russia NEW IDEA TO ME suggested by Sorensen731 who points out that during the First World War the Ottoman empire fell, Constantinople was under occupation by the British/ANZ forces, the middle east was under French or British control. Was the agreement with Jews in America (able to invent money though the Federal Reserve since 1913) NOT to give Palestine, but Russia, as a 'homeland' where 'Jews' lived for generations? Maybe the Balfour Declaration was fraud or a distraction, while Jews in the know were given Russia? Russia handed over to be invaded, ruined and bled, used as cheap labour, its assets, for example goldfields, used by Jewish capitalists? While the 'west' stood by and did little?
[ Me in 'The Occidental Observer' 2016: It's perfectly possible Jews were given Russia, in a secret agreement before or during the First World War. Everyone's heard of the Balfour Agreement on Palestine - which was trumpeted, advertised, promoted, supported, noticed. But why should there not have been a secret agreement to award Russia to Jews? There had been a constant feed of propaganda in Europe against Russia at least since Napoleon's time. In view of the unanimity of censorship about events in Russia as Jews took over, this is certainly highly probable.
Antony Cyril Sutton was born an Englishman, in 1925, and died an American on June 17, 2002. He graduated from the University of Southampton, home of the Parkes Institute, and in 1957 relocated to California, becoming an American citizen in 1962. It was while at Stanford University's Hoover Institution that he wrote a massive three volume study Western Technology And Soviet Economic Development; later he would condense this into National Suicide: Military Aid To The Soviet Union. The thesis of this work is basically that there was no such thing as Soviet technology, that from the very beginning, the United States - or both political and business elements within the United States - assisted the Soviet Union, and that it built it through the 1920s and 30s, and even more astonishingly through the Cold War and the arms race, including even the Vietnam War, when American service personnel were being maimed and killed by Soviet-made ordnance. From http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/326318#ixzz40s4iiulP
Sutton's work was noted in Lady Birdwood's Anti-Gentilism: The Longest Hatred. ]

1916 Sykes-Picot Agreement between France and England on some Arab countries east of the Mediterranean. The issue of Turkey, Egypt, and countries further east (Iran for example, then called Persia) and their oil had revisionist makeovers by Miles Mathis's arab.pdf

1917  Jewish coup in Russia, planned for years, takes place. Americanised Jews using false Russian names and American paper money were the principal drivers. (It is still falsely claimed to be 'the Russian Revolution', based on the pretence in e.g. Marx that secretly-funded violent groups are 'revolutionary workers'. A good example of a deceptive Jewish fake label. Another deceptive label is 'socialist' for this system of Jewish-run slave labour and genocide. Note that Union of Soviet Socialist Republics seems to have been universally adopted as a name, rather than (say) Jewish slave states of Russia. The 'British' Empire, similarly, had various protectorates etc, but was never referred to as 'Jewish' or 'Jewish-owned'.
      Incidentally, many nations and groups were moved, diluted, enslaved and so on in the USSR: I have seen no estimate of the total number of historical groups largely or completely erased but one might plausibly guess 5 or 10)

      Interesting piece on Lenin and Jews in the Tsarist regime (real or supposed) by Miles Mathis, dated 21st June 2016

1917  Moissaye J. Olgin  The Soul of the Russian Revolution (Short passage claiming many nationalities in the Russian empire before 1914 were revolutionary. Clearly trying to claim some sort of fellow-feeling with Jews. Note the use of the word 'extermination')

1918   British 'Labour Party' adopts Clause IV drafted by Sydney 'Webb' (Jewish) in 1917 into its constitution. ('To secure for the workers by hand or by brain the full fruits of their industry and the most equitable distribution thereof that may be possible upon the basis of the common ownership of the means of production, distribution and exchange, and the best obtainable system of popular administration and control of each industry or service.' Note that control of currency is not mentioned; nor is war; nor is invention and discovery; and, in particular, nor is the dominant position of Jews such as the Rothschilds, Warburgs, Sachses and so on. This must have been part of the 'controlled opposition' aspect of the co-called 'Labour' Party. The Liberal Party plummeted as 'Labour' rose; this is usually attributed to Liberal dislike of unions, but is probably a result of Jewish paper money funding for 'Labour'. Note that Webb became 'Lord Passfield' in later life; naming Jews after some British town or region is a favourite way to disguise their surnames)

1918   Armistice signed with Germany on November 11th. [ The Germans didn't "lose" WWI. The Armistice [Waffenstillstand means something like 'arms stand still'] was an agreement to put the war on "hold". No foreign troops set foot in Germany prior to November 11, 1918. It was the bankers at Versailles that defeated Germany. The annihilation actually started in 1918. The allies illegally blockaded Germany until 1925. This created food shortages, and estimates were that 3-5 million starved to death.]

Jan or Feb 1919   Argentina 'Communist' 'Revolution' in Buenos Aires, in which all fourteen top revolutionaries were first or second generation Jew émigrés from Russia

April 1919   RUSSIA. No. 1 (1919). A COLLECTION OF REPORTS ON BOLSHEVISM IN RUSSIA. Published by HMSO (His Majesty's Stationery Office).   An official set of reports (costing ninepence), some more than six months old, mostly sent by telegraphy, and mostly to Balfour. Balfour (of 'the Agreement') was no doubt persuaded by Jews to remove some material. It's entirely possible the horror was underestimated, as the Bryce Report, by an Oxbridge Professor, was a compendium of far worse fabricated lies and atrocity stories against Germany.

1919   Hungary has a 'Soviet Revolution' supposedly led by Bela Kun [Here's a link to a short account written twenty years later, The Revolution that Failed. Even though written by a presumably Jewish sympathiser, the inhumanity and dishonesty shine through unmistakably. This led later to Hungary's 1956 uprising and the political party Jobbik).
    The Hungarian Soviet Republic is of course forgotten whenever Jews control 'history'; it's unlikely Poliakoff will include it in his BBC trash, for example. Note that Hungary, in the eastern Austro-Hungarian Empire, was larger than Austria. The failure of its 'Soviet Republic' resulted in: (1) Jews in Hungary moving west, with fake sob stories. Emigration of Jews from Hungary to the USA formed part of the Jewish 'nuclear' science, and other frauds. (2) Reconsideration by Jews, particularly to their handling of Germany, and emergence of Hitler.]

1919   J M Keynes's The Economic Consequences of the Peace marks Keynes's emergence as a public intellectual. He was at the Versailles Conference, but completely missed the Jewish aspects, including the 1913 'Federal Reserve'. [ Keynes's later books included A Treatise on Money (1930), his General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money (1936), and How to Pay for [what became] the [Second World] War (1940). All these books continued to omit the Jewish aspect, despite Keynes's academic interest in money and monetary matters, and therefore were more or less worthless. It is possible Keynes awoke; his death was sudden, and coincided with the 'World Bank', 'International Monetary Fund, 'United Nations', NATO, Jewish-controlled Russia and satellites allowed to mass murder Germans, 'Cold War', and Jewish-controlled fake nuclear schemes. Was Keynes murdered?
    There are entire pseudo-revisionist schools around Keynes. For example, I found a long piece by Scott Newton in Lobster, a fake anti-conspiracy magazine, of Winter 1998/9. It's a verbal equivalent of scientific papers using doubtful maths and doubtful or vague concepts: '... orthodox story that Keynes started his career as a free trader, graduated to support for controls on foreign lending and for managed international monetary cooperation in the 1920s, embraced protectionism in the 1930s and rediscovered Adam Smith in the 1940s. ...' ]


1920  Henry Ford   The International Jew   (First popular account of the Jewish problem that I know of; the link's version includes related material and introductions. Ford was falsely claimed to have withdrawn his books and his views. Ford's point of view was partly business-related, but considerably influenced by the First World War and Jewish activity at the Versailles conference)

1920  Bertrand Russell  The Practice and Theory of Bolshevism written after Russell visited the new USSR as part of an invited group (Detailed examination of Russell's failure to address the issue of Jews in the 'Soviet Union'—and indeed in all his writings here: • Bertrand Russell—Dupe of Racist Jews —this link has a lot of material on Russell and Jews)

1920  George Pitt-Rivers   The World Significance of the Russian Revolution (Blackwell pamphlet pp xiii+45 Intro Oscar Levy)   (Short book written by a pioneer archaeologist. Pitt-Rivers was Jew-aware, but seems not to have understood the fraudulent Jewish money illustrated e.g. by the Federal Reserve. His book is emphatic, but lacks this essential jigsaw puzzle piece. Note: this is very common in Jew-aware articles: they are usually not Jew-aware enough to be fully convincing.)

1920   The Palmer Raid in the U.S.A. perhaps marks the end of the 'Golden Age of US Religious Freethought'. The Federal Government 'waged war' against Communism, Anarchism, subversives, and religious freethought. All of these movements included Jewish aims in one form or another.

1920s   Oxford University about this time introduced PPE (Politics, Philosophy, and Economics) as the principal university course for aspiring politicians. Nothing, of course, about war, finance, raw materials, history, foreigners and their beliefs. Very brief look at P.P.E.

1920–1933 Prohibition in the USA. I have seen no convincing explanation for this phenomenon and Jew connections, though there are obvious suspicions around profiteering of the 'opium wars' type, corrupt legal practices including blackmail, and corruption involving new job-generating bureaucracies. Perhaps the intention was to remove small brewers and distillers, in the same way that hemp, cotton, and synthetic fibres had a three-way war.

1920s E. D. Morel's The Horror on the Rhine (1920...)

1921   New Economic Policy ... introduced by Lenin in the USSR. I owe it to a remark by 'Karl Radl' (British academic, in the USA; the name is a pseudonym) that the N.E.P. (as it's referred to in the Anglo world, avoiding Russian lettering) allowed Jews to become rich. [ I suggest the N.E.P. was intended to make Jews in the USSR rich: the war was over, Russians were under the thumb of Jews, the layer of worldwide Jewry could secretly trade with the USSR, the Fed could hand money to Jews—just right to start the overt rule of Jews in the USSR! ]

1921 ... Mr. Borge Jensen [states] that in the Encyclopaedia Britannica [edition not given], under “Russia, New Financial Policies,” will be found the statement that “the State Bank [of Soviet Russia] was established in 1921 [that is, four years after the Revolution] and given authority to issue bank notes as well as to serve as a credit institution. . . the rouble was thus given its pre-war gold equivalent.” “In other words,” Mr. Jensen comments, “the Jewish system of finance, i.e., the issue of credit based on gold, was adopted by the ‘new’ and ‘proletarian’ country as obediently as by all the other ‘Capitalist’ countries. The link between the two largest Federations in the world is, fittingly enough, the ruling Jewish financial house of the world, Kuhn, Loeb & Co., and when members of the families of Warburg, Kahn, etc., visit the Soviet capital they are received with royal pomp, the Soviet troops . . . presenting arms as they pass.” See P.R. Masson and Burge Jensen Hitler’s Policy Is a Jewish Policyif you can find it-RW

1921   Nesta Webster   World Revolution—The Plot Against Civilization [based on lectures she gave to British officers, after the end of the First World War. She had spent three years researching archives (in France) of the French Revolution, which was then fewer than 150 years in the past. In that respect she somewhat resembled David Irving. However, her notes are not detailed, perhaps because typesetting at that time needed skilled labour, so the production costs of books would be raised by such extra detail.
    Anyone interested in 1848, the unification of Germany, the 'Paris Commune' of 1871, Marx as a plagiarist might do well to read this book. She wrote many others; and was ignored and censored. She disliked H G Wells, and the feeling was mutual. Her books are 'continuistic'—she assumes anyone with some idea must have been influenced by someone earlier, who had a similar idea. She was very Christian. She does not tease out separate strands of Jews, masons, illuminati, and the rest. Note that Walter Scott, now best known as a romantic novelist, wrote on Jews and the French Revolution]


1922  Hilaire Belloc  The Jews (Detailed notes and account of Belloc's book, with chapter-by-chapter extracts. It is still unique in trying to describe and face the issues. Belloc was prompted by Jewish raw materials controls, and 'scandalous' profiteering, during the 'Great War' the then-used name for what's now called the First World War. His Roman Catholicism interposes some filters; for example Belloc never seems to have doubted that modern Jews were the same race as Biblical Jews. This book is now almost a century old. Belloc had some predecessors, for example Walter Scott and 19th century newspaper writers, but no genre or school was allowed to form in the English-speaking world. Belloc's book may be taken as marking the start of public criticism of Jews in the United Kingdom. The 'Irish Free State' Eire had just been formed. See 1928 for Belloc's novel Belinda).
      And in the very same year–

1922   BBC ('British' Broadcasting Corporation) founded under John Reith who was selected as a simple uneducated Scottish religious type. He must have been sounded out for his view on 'Jews', probably discreetly. My link is to a long file of reviews, including reviews of five typical 'serious' BBC books. It's difficult to imagine how radio would have developed if Britain hadn't declared war on Germany in 1914, expanding the First World War; it may not have been a state monopoly, for example. The BBC takes the Jewish view, always; sometimes the Director-General has been a Jew, for example General Jacob during the time of mass killings of Germans and the rigged-up Nuremberg 'trials'. At the time of writing (late 2013) a Jew has been appointed, as Jews increasingly notice that truths are coming out.
    [To quote from my review: 'The BBC has ALWAYS, ever since its beginning, been purely establishment, in the pragmatic sense of including Jewish influence as 'establishment'. In the 1920s, it permitted no debate on whether WW1 was a mistake - there were no inquiries; in the 1930s it had nothing on Stalin or on Jews or for that matter the Royals; the Spanish Civil War was not reported honestly; in the 1940s it was pure Churchilliana with unsparing anti-German propaganda; in the 1950s it never deviated from pro-American views on Korea, supposed nuclear weapons; the Nuremberg Trials were never queried. In the 1960s there was no honest comment on the Vietnam War. I could go on, including science frauds too. But the simple point is: the BBC has never, ever, been honest.'
    'Endzog' produced evidence on 2 Feb 2015 that the Dimbleby family are (or think they are) Jewish and are part of the BBC's systematic destruction of Britain.]


1923  'Frankfurt School' founded  Kevin MacDonald's review of 'Stalin's Willing Executioners' (Jews believed Germany came near to a Jewish-controlled 'communist' revolution under Rosa Luxemburg, presumably helped by German 'useful idiots'. No doubt the 'School of Social Research' was established for this purpose. The 'Frankfurt School' provides academics with valuable and more-or-less explicit written evidence of their aims as a 'hostile elite'. MacDonald's book review mentions them in passing)

1923   Treaty of Lausanne with Turkey. Not easy to interpret; probably marked (1) the end of the 'Great War' considered as an event of its own; (2) Ottoman Empire's fall, or reshaping, or modernisation; (3) emergence of Turkey; (4) one of a series of ethnic changes of the 20th century, separating Greeks from Turks; (5) underlying influence of Jewish layers enhanced, since Jews in the US had consolidated moneys from the First World War. [ A significant example in the nascent history of races, cultures, nations, and other groups, and their manipulations both friendly and hostile. Examples include Germans, Czechs, Poles, Jews, Muslims, Hindus ]

1923   Ireland After 1921 Anglo-Irish Treaty there were general elections. A publication dated 1923 is Our Judeo-Irish Labour Party, which I can't find anywhere online. [ Even in 2018, most Irish seem to have no idea of Jewish policy as regards immigration into Ireland. Nor of course is the detail of Jews in the founding of the 'Republic of Ireland' known. ]

1924   Richard Nikolas Eijiro Graf Coudenhove-Kalergi attracts the attention of Jewish war profiteers, including Bernard Baruch in the USA, with a publication. I've tried to summarise this semi-aristocratic half-breed, who has in recent years become notorious as predicting or suggesting Europe will become 'eurasisch-negroide' ('Eurasian-Negroid'). His pinpointing Europe (not other countries) suggests he anticipated, or followed, the Jewish anti-white race policy of the 20th century and up to now. My best guess is he is mutedly promoted by the EU in the way Pulitzer Prizes are awarded—i.e. the line to be taken is decided, then some hack who wrote something similar enough is unearthed and awarded their 'prize'.

1924   R. M. Whitney Reds in America—spoken of with approval by Revilo Oliver: '... You will find it all there, from atheistic communism to Bolshevik butcheries.' The book has some, unclear, identification of Jews. It has a single mention of the 'Federal Reserve', but not its Jewish roots and policies. Whitney was a journalist, 'the author of numerous pamphlets on patriotic subjects'—I'd guess including American participation from 1916 in the Jewish 'Great War'.

1925   Pearson & Moul begin to publish a series of articles on whether or not 'Jews' were fit for immigration into Great Britain. Part of the eugenics movement, which came under attack after 1945 by Jewish front organisations. [See Genetic disorders among the Jewish people by Richard M Goodman (Johns Hopkins Univ Press, 1979)]

1925   Gold Standard reintroduced by Winston Churchill in Britain. Keynes opposed this—partly because there simply wasn't enough gold in the world. It seems likely the manoeuvring about gold was intended ultimately to get gold into private or Jewish ownership, judging by the policies, and even the name.

1925   Adolf Hitler's Mein Kampf Vol. I published in German

1926   Adolf Hitler's Mein Kampf Vol II published in German (In fact Dec 11th, 1926). Both volumes in English were only published in a full translation in 1939. There was a 1933 abridged version, translated by a relative of Balfour of the 'Balfour Declaration'. Detailed review of both volumes. This book was, and still is, widely censored and of course misrepresented

1926   General Strike in Britain. Possibly this was a demonstration of Jewish power in Britain; a large-scale demonstration by Jews that they could incite massive action, in the way familiar from fake demonstrations and behind-the-scenes force. I don't think I've seen a revisionist re-examination of this event.

1927   Bertrand Russell in The Jewish Daily Forward wonders about white race extinction ' ... [If there is capitalism] there will be that division of castes which we spoke of a moment ago, the upper caste retaining the family, the lower substituting the State for the parents. And there will still be need to produce submissiveness in the lower caste, lest it should rebel against the rich. This will involve a low level of culture, and will perhaps lead the rich to encourage breeding among black rather than white or yellow proletarians. The white race may thus gradually become a numerically small aristocracy, and be finally exterminated by a negro insurrection. ...' (Note that Russell doesn't specifically mention Jews at all; unfortunately he followed the British taboo of that time)]

1927   Sergei Eisenstein's film October, on the tenth anniversary of the 'Russian Revolution' (Jewish coup). Different version in 1928 was entitled Ten Days That Shook the World.
    [ Jewish control over cinema naturally obtained in the USSR, just as it did over printed media. This is a huge field for propagandist researchers, helping to show up parallel activities in other countries, notably the USA. There appear to be close similarities: faked history, of course; total omission of Jews and Jewish money; Jewish vision of the USSR and Russians and the many other nationalities; ideological oddities derived from Jewish supremacism and Jewish indifference to other groups and religions, such as supposed race equality, scientists as willing to work for nothing, women's equality, workers as equals of other non-Jews, 'bourgeoisie' as deserving death. Eisenstein didn't really fit the mould of mass output of propagandist junk, and its printed equivalent; and 'socialist realism' as far as I know was more usually applied to paintings and 'fine art'. I've never seen a website on this topic, though perhaps revisionist-minded patient Russians with access to old films and newsreels might produce something deep. One topic is whether any of it was worthwhile: a similar question to the equivalent in mass media in the USA. Surely some of it must have merit? ]

1928?   First edition of Lt-Col Arthur Henry Lane's book The Alien Menace: A Statement of the Case (Boswell Publishing). I'm not sure I've ever seen this book mentioned before, though it's in The Occidental Observer 25 March 2017.
[ 19 chapters, dealing with separate issues, including '... How they Get Here', Unemployment, Public Health, Morals, Cost, Films, BBC, Revolution, Politics, Ireland, Industry, Education, Palestine, War Debts, and What Should Be Done.
    Has press cuttings and facsimile letters and information on the so-called "Labour Party" and the so-called "Russian" Revolution. Many of the features of post-1945 Britain are here, for example the failure by officials to act against Jew illegals, and the financial penalties of aliens as against Britons, and crime, and control of the BBC—which at the time was young, itself relying on the fairly recent invention of radio; and shipping lines dumping Jews, with Ellis Island contrasted with e.g. Liverpool.
    Lane fought in the First World War, and seems to have had no doubt that Germany and/or Austria started it, and deserved to be fought. His lack of information on Germany must be related to Jewish 'News Agencies' such as Reuters. Confusions of this sort are typical, perhaps inevitable, results of Jewish multiple actions. ]


1928  H G Wells and the New World Order  (Wells was important for popularising the idea of a democratic united states of the world, in reaction to the devastation of the 'Great War'. But as with most ideals—democracy, freedom, equality, education, eugenics, human rights—much of the message was deliberated deformed. Worth noting that Wells did not comment much on Jews and paper money, which is possibly why he was tolerated)

1928  Hilaire Belloc's romantic novel of the mid-1800s Belinda explicitly mentions Mayer Amschel, Napoleon's defeat, and the stock exchange as getting English money into Jewish hands.     [Possibly the first novel to do this. Maria Edgeworth's The Absentee and Trollope's mention of Jews in his novels are some of the few 19th century novels looking at the issue. There may also be US novels of the time, though I'm not aware of any.]

1928   Journey's End written by R C Sherriff (Robert Cedric Sherriff, 1896 – 1975). [ This play (Sherriff wrote previous plays, titles suggesting farces) was taken up and promoted widely. He may have invented the genre of sentimental incuriosity and self-centredness which of course is ideal for Jewish presentation of war as unexamined inevitable limited conflict, plus suppression of serious issues). ]

1929   Wall Street Crash & Great Depression. (Preceded by 'crash' at the London Stock Exchange). Two events—this, and the Civil War/ War Between the States/ War of Secession—are the most in need of revisionism within the United States.
      [ A good account is How a Group of International Bankers Engineered the 1929 Crash and the Great Depression from None Dare Call it Conspiracy (online here for example.
      A new account (July 2017) by 'Josh G' is here, on Miles Mathis' site. Sparked by Mathis on Lindbergh, this is a new look at the 'New Deal', Roosevelt, Jews etc. Marxists used to claim the crash was predicted by Marx, an inevitable working out of 'capitalism'; no doubt several Jewish motivations were in play. ]


1929  L Dudley Stamp (later Lord Stamp)'s Asia and The World - A General Geography helped describe the world, partly based on information from the British Empire. Stamp (who knew and worked with Keynes) was one of the few public figures to draw attention to paper money's immense fraudulent possibilities.

1929  THE FASCIST 'The Organ of Racial Fascism' established in England, published by The Imperial Fascist League, Editor and Director Arnold S Leese. [ I have not been able to find free downloadable online pdf copies of this or other Jew-aware British newspapers. There are various catalogues etc and descriptions of collections of papers, but censorship rules. However, https://www.oswaldmosley.com advertises a free download of The Blackshirt at some unspecified future time. But it's entirely possible that online collections exist: some tantalisingly offer access on payment, but don't say what they have or whether parts are 'closed'. ukpressonline.co.uk says it is 'The best British newspaper archive on the web' and (for example) has thumbnail pictures of the Blackshirt; I haven't investigated their pricing, or whether pdfs can be downloaded without print costs. NB worth noting these journals tend to be relatively small, unpadded by advertising. ]

1930  Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland formed; presumably replacing previous more scattered arrangements, or forcing a monopoly. No doubt connected with Hitler's Germany. Probably the location was suggested by Alpine security, and multilingual population.

1931  Gold Standard   started to fail. (There's an obvious connection between worthless paper money and uncertainty and wars: and since the advent of Jewish monopolies, there's been the possibility for Jews to gain by wars, offloading the costs onto both present and future generations).

1931  Worth commenting on the few speculative works on the British Empire and Jews. Nesta Webster The Surrender of an Empire (1931), Leslie Fry (Shishmareff/Shishmarev, neé Louise A. Chandor) Jews and the British Empire (1935). Probably the subject was too vast to be encompassed satisfactorily. Movement of power to the USA happened almost unnoticed, as is the way with legal manipulation and secret hierarchies. The only well-known event as far as I know is the Washington Naval Conference.
    It's worth noting the general suppression of information on money and empires, just as on money and wars. And not just in Britain: the French Empires were notoriously cruel, but the Jewish interests as far as I know were suppressed from the news, just as in Britain. As was the US post-1945 empire and the Jewish connection. A whole system of deception was built up, based on two Talmudic points: [1] Any small event was regarded by the Jewish media as an excuse for a war they wanted; hence false flags and other fakes, and exaggerations and lies on atrocities and deaths. [2] Jews were assumed to deserve special treatment: thus, if Britain and the USA saved Jews, shouldn't Jews pay? Why should other countries remain indebted, after the sacrifices they'd made? [3] To assure non-questioning of those two points, media, law, economic pressures, education pressures, and thugs were used. Propaganda in particular was and is essential to Jews: Jews are expert in casting blame onto others:- aristocrats, Catholics, Russians, Germans, Japanese, whites, Palestinians, Afrikaaners, Koreans, Vietnamese, Iraqis, Iranians, Syrians, white Americans. It's perfectly correct as far as it goes, to say 'The USA is a two-faced, treacherous entity, never to be trusted' or to talk of 'perfidious Albion'. BUT this does not take Jewish actions into account. After the establishment of Israel in Palestine, some of these patterns are becoming clearer.

1933  Emergency Banking Relief Act (9 Mar 1933) and F D Roosevelt's Gold Confiscation Executive Order (5 Apr 1933), later, Banking Act (16 Jun 1933). [ Louis T. McFadden is the best-known and best-informed critic of the Federal Reserve system. Here's one online source of McFadden, from the Congressional Record, June 1932, pp 12595-12603. The powerful section entitled International Swindlers is McFadden's overview. It's not known to me how, or if, McFadden perceived Jews. These currency manipulations set the stage for Jewish actions and the Second World War, as the First World War was enabled by the 1913 Federal reserve Act. ]

New york Jews 1933
1933   New York meeting of Jews. Note the early use of the 'Nazi' slang. This sort of thing was the reason for the Daily Express headline (next item). [Internet photo]
1933  The German NSDAP (translated as National Socialist German Workers' Party) led by Hitler obtained a majority in Germany under the proportional representation system, apparently with some or all 'Communists' not included. Under first-past-the-post, that party would have obtained something closer to 100% of the seats. [ The point to be made here is that Germany had at least six parties with substantial support, each of course with leaders, deputies, orators and so on. It's possible Hitler obtained covert support from Jews because he was the most moderate leader, not, as Jewish propaganda asserted later, extremist and fanatical. Newsreels of the time, where available, show Hitler being greeted in a very friendly manner by other nations' leaders. Perhaps this was the reason for the murder of Ernst Röhm and other brownshirts, soon after. All this may explain the apparent paradox of Jewish support for Hitler, who, when his work in assisting Jews was done, could be eliminated along with German power, and then be demonised. ]

1933   All 1933 issues after March The Monthly Record of South Place Ethical Society, Conway Hall, Red Lion Square, London, are missing from their website. [ This is the only omitted period. Typical of censorship of documents under the control of crypto-Jews and supposedly devoted to serious causes. I emailed several groups for information, but received nothing. Probably the tone was optimistic: Hitler was certainly, in some part, Jew-funded, and was more moderate than many Germans, after such experiences as attempted 'communist revolutions' in Germany and Hungary. (The magazine was later renamed The Ethical Record). ]

1933   is a convenient starting-point for the study of secret Jewish anti-German and pro-USSR propaganda. [ Here's Charles Krafft in The Occidental Observer: International Jewry's "frenzy" over Germany's Judenpolitik began [by] demonizing the National Socialists [via] seasoned professionals in the Anglo-American intelligence services and the leadership and lobbyists from a panopoly of Jewish ... NGOs. ... the symbiosis between these two behind-the-scenes cabals has been entirely overlooked by those ... looking for holes in a genocide narrative that was fabricated by social engineers and psychological warfare experts. Influential Jews in the U.S. and British governments, the Marxist Frankfurt School, militant Zionists (Irgun operative Hillel Kook's "Bergson Boys") and 9,000 mostly Jewish German speaking refugee U.S. soldiers trained in psychological warfare at Camp Ritchey, Maryland and the Camp Sharp Annex in Gettysburg have never been the subject of any revisionist study I can think of. After helping launch the Nazi gassing meme at Nuremburg using creative Hollywood film editing, U.S. Psychological Warfare Dept. SHAEF Bragidier [sic] General C.D. Jackson, a lifelong OSS/CIA strategist, went on to help subvert the 2,000 year old dogma of the Catholic church at Vatican II in Rome in l965 for Henry Luce, David Rockefeller and others so they could destabilize South America governments and plunder the Southern hemisphere. The only extant biography of Jackson in print is a thin 92 page masters thesis that entirely ignores the clandestine operations he headed in WWII. ]

1933   Freemason's Hall, London opened; claimed to have been built 'between 1927–1932 as a memorial to the Freemasons who died in the First World War'. With the 'Grand Temple (seating 1,700), 21 Lodge Rooms, Board and Committee Rooms'.

1933 March 24th   British Daily Express newspaper headline JUDEA DECLARES WAR ON GERMANY interesting as a sort of message of Jewish intent of the self-styled Jewish leaders, though the Jewish financial interests naturally kept quiet. [ A 'World Jewish Economic Federation' led by Samuel Untermyer, a lawyer who blackmailed President Wilson into bringing the USA into the First World War, held an 'International Jewish Boycott Conference' in Amsterdam. Later, in 1939, Weizmann's letter in the Times confirmed that the 'Jews of Great Britain' will fight 'on the side of the democracies'. (He didn't mention the undemocracy of the Jewish-run USSR, or the democracy of NSDAP Germany). There is a newspaper trail of all this material, which of course has been suppressed by Jewish media-owners. (Note that the Jewish pornographer now owning the Daily Express in Britain allegedly deleted a front-page photo of British soldiers hanged in Israel in 1947, though I haven't been able to find a facsimile of that edition).]

1933 August  'Haavara Agreement' between NSDAP and 'World Jewish Agency', including German Interior Ministry and Reichsbank. [ While Jewish students were being evicted from German schools the Jewish Agency set up schools in Germany for Jewish students. Jewish Teachers were bought to Germany from Palestine and everything was paid for by the Nazis. Not only were these Schools and teachers paid for by the Nazis but there was absolutely no interference from the Nazis as to the teaching curriculum. This extract is from the unsourced article Pact Between Hitler and the Zionists which includes opposition by established rich Jews to Zionism, and effects of war against Germany. ]

1933 Jewish fraudulent propaganda example: Alfred Weiner. His collection (largely microfiches) is partly in Russell Square, London. It is now called 'The Wiener Library for the Study of the Holocaust and Genocide' though its name has varied. It is registered as a charity (313015). From Wikipedia: Alfred Wiener, a German Jew who worked for the Centralverein deutscher Staatsbürger jüdischen Glaubens (Central Association of German Citizens of Jewish Faith), a Jewish civil rights group, spent years documenting the rise of antisemitism. He collected books, photographs, letters, magazines and other materials, including school primers and children's games, recording the spread of Nazi propaganda and its racist doctrines. In 1933, Wiener fled Germany for Amsterdam and then settled in Britain. The collection opened in London on 1 September 1939, the day of the Nazi invasion of Poland. It was known as the Jewish Central Information Office and functioned as a private intelligence service. Wiener was paid by the British government to keep Britain informed of developments in Germany.

hooverville
  Jews, and their collaborators, had, and still have, hugely over-represented power. [From America - A Narrative History Library of Congress. This is a 1992 edition, vol 2, attributed to Tindall & Shi, completely lacking any discussion of Jew power and Jew atrocities and lies. The price - well below the competition - makes America the best buy for the course. Claimed to be used at more than 800 colleges and universities in the United States and around the world. ]
1933 USA recognized USSR [ Presumably as a result of Jewish pressure. Note this event is contemporary with or postdates the Holodomor ]

1933  Francis Dvornik  History of the Khazars and their conversion to Judaism (Just to show the Khazaria Empire and the conversion to Judaism was well-known and documented before Arthur Koestler's book, and before the state of Israel was founded).

1933  Francis Parker Yockey/ Richard Hatch/ Ulick Varange referred to 'the American Revolution of 1933' in his 1948 book Imperium, which is an unreadable 'philosophy' on e.g. 'subjective races', including absurd historical praise of Jews. According to Willis Carto, Yockey offered this to Oswald Mosley, for publication under Mosley's name! Even today Jews promote this rubbish.

1934  Daily Mail and the 1930s—Rothermere, Northcliffe, Oswald Mosley and the Blackshirts (Piercing together what happened & noting similarities with today's anti-free speech 'red' thugs)

1934  Malcolm Muggeridge  Winter in Moscow  (Description of Muggeridge, plus thirteen sections from his novel of life in the USSR. The sections are all those that mention Jews)

1934   Biro-Bidjan or Birobidjan or Birobidzhan, the Jewish Autonomous Region, always described as 'about the size of Switzerland', was established by the Soviet regime in the USSR, the first Jewish region defined in modern times. Another suggested area was Madagascar. [ www.geschichteinchronologie.com is one website making an attempt to make sense of Birobizhan. It had lukewarm support; and there are claims Jews were forcibly prevented by other Jews from going there. There was a 'big stream' of Jewish settlers from 1945-1948; or, this was a claim made, perhaps as encouragement. It 'increased the local Jewish population ... from 20,000 to 30,000, and by the end of 1948 it was estimated at about 30,000, the largest ever in the region.' And then, 'In the years 1948-9, the Kaganovich Yiddish Theatre, the Jewish publishing house, the periodical Birobidzhan, the rich library of Yiddish and Hebrew books, and the Jewish research institutions and schools were all closed down.' For such a tiny population, these institutions sound more or less imaginary. ]

1934   Swiss Federation Act on Banks made it a criminal offence to reveal a client's identity. (1815 post-Napoleonic Wars neutrality of Switzerland helped pave the way). Developments in telephony must have had an influence.

1935   UK General Election; the next would be in 1945, a 1939 election being deemed unavailable, presumably after Churchill's war declaration.

1935   'Italy invades Abyssinia'. That, at least, is the usual formulation. In view of Jewish money, a Rothschild in Italy, comparative Italian unawareness of the Jewish problem, and Jewish interests in raw materials and invasions and death, it may well be that Jews were the moving force. The personification of Italy, France, Britain, the USA, Germany, and even 'Russia', disguises the possibility.

1935  First ever translation of the 'Talmud' into English  (Seems to have been more or less ignored. (It's worth noting that the Church of England made no noticeable comment, then or since, despite supposedly having some expertise. Probably the decline of this church dates from 1914—no useful commentary on the First World War was ever made, despite the obvious need and relevance). 1935 perhaps marks the start of non-religious text-based criticism of Judaism. And perhaps the 'Zohar'. Michael Hoffman's Judaism's Strange Gods (first published 2000) is another stage in this process, including the 'Mishnah'. There's similar slow progress in Quranic-related rationalist studies)
    [ Note on rationalism: It is possible that rationalist criticism of 'Jewish' books will grow, though if criticism of Christianity in any guide, it may be a slow process: The King James Bible (published 1611) to the German 'higher criticism' school (started 1850ish) was only a beginning of rationalism. Just as many people believed, or said they believed, the Bible was written or inspired by God and Jesus once existed, many Jews believe, or say they believe, they are 'chosen people' and Moses once existed. So perhaps 2150 will be the start of official studies of analysis of 'Jews'. Per contra irrationalism may spread, just as the Talmud etc seem to have been transplanted to Khazaria, these things in translation will move to China or Japan. A multi-polar Judaism might develop, with several racially and geographically fanatical groups. ]

1935   First publication of Will Durant's History of Civilization, Vol I, rather oddly titled 'Our Oriental Heritage'. Once fairly well-known for Chapter 16, beginning ‘The Mohammedan Conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in history.’ [ Sources given are: Smith's Oxford History, including an ancient Moslem chronicle, Tabakat-i-Nasiri, and Ibn Batuta. And Havell, History, and Mountstuart Elphinstone's History of India. Islam has been propagandised both for and against, and it seems all but certain that Jewish interests have been behind this. Certainly around 2000 A.D. Jews have promoted invasion into white countries by Moslems; and Jew-controlled information such as Wikipaedia barely mention Islam in India. ] Compare:–

1935  Joseph McCabe   The Splendour of Moorish Spain  (McCabe was a Catholic who became a fierce critic of Roman Catholicism. Fair enough—but he never criticised Jews or Muslims and was in fact published and promoted by Jews. McCabe popularised the idea that Spain had had an impressive civilisation when Moorish and Jewish. This book looks like a deliberate propaganda fraud, related to Jewish aims to control Spain)

1936   Robert Edward Edmondson in the USA. (From Rightpedia. Edmondson was a financial journalist, who did his best to publicise Jewish activities. [ On June 11, 1936 Edmondson was indicted by a Jew-majority Grand Jury in New York City and charged with “libeling all persons of the Jewish Religion.” In preparing his defense Edmondson subpoenaed some of the most prominent Jews of the time: Bernard Buruch [sic], Henry Morganthau [sic], Rabbi Stephen Wise, Samuel Untermeyer, New York City mayor Fiorello LaGuardia, James P. Warburg, Walter Lippmann and Justice Samuel Rosenman. In response, the American Jewish Committee petitioned the court to drop the charges against Edmondson. On May 10, 1938 the judge dismissed all indictments claiming there is no group libel law.
    In the early 1940s Edmondson was again persecuted by the Jews and was indicted along with 29 others on charges of sedition. The Great Sedition Trial of 1944, as it became known, was declared a mistrial and the charges were later dismissed. ]


1936   Arnold Leese (1878-1956; there was an article on Leese in Rightpedia) with material on Jewish Ritual Murder (followed by his book 1938 Jewish Ritual Murder; mostly English events, but similar information exists about other parts of the world and in other languages. Metapedia has been taken over, and now only shows the cover design!) This, on Jewish instigation, led to a legal case, resulting in imprisonment for Leese. It seems to be assumed, in for example Canada fairly recently, that truth is always a defence against libel. But Leese wrote: '... I came to Court very fully prepared ... even ... to demand ... from the Public Records Office certain Close and Patent Rolls of the State wherein Jewish Ritual Murder is recorded as an established fact in this country! But I was forbidden by the Judge to use this line of defence; it did not matter who else had charged the Jews with ritual murder, or how often, or what historic facts proved it, or how many convictions there had been under proper juridical authority; ... Judge intervened with the remark "The truth of a libel is no defense, I must point out again." ... the Attorney-General ... interrupted another question of mine to the same witness, by the remark: "In my submission, it is correctly laid down that the defendant is in no case allowed to prove the truth of a seditious libel as a justification for having published it." ... Such may be the law, but it is not justice! ...'
    It's clear enough that it's the 'sedition' that was the issue. So why was it prosecuted as libel? Why did Jews invent the phrase 'blood libel'? Why aren't such prosecutions under the heading sedition—as of course obtained in the USSR, where non-Jews were murdered in huge numbers?—No doubt to conceal the facts of close Jewish involvement. Note that the reason given for the final expulsions of Jews from most European countries (by serious non-Jewish commentators) was the discovery of some murderous atrocity, not legal or financial matters.
    Important note: the 'blood libel' does not take account of political murders, which of course have often been concealed by collaboration with legal systems.


1936   Elizabeth Dilling (of Chicago) published The Roosevelt Red Record and Its Background, on the 'New Deal', President Franklin Delano Roosevelt, and his administration. She was anti-'Communist', having visited the USSR. But at that time the Talmud had not been translated, so she was not, then, clearly aware of the link with Jews. This confusion of course persists to the present day: vast numbers of Americans talk about 'anti-Communism' (and 'Democrat', 'Republican'), without understanding the Jewish connection. She also wrote The Plot Against Christianity, later retitled The Jewish Religion: Its Influence Today.

1936   Founding of the Left Book Club in Britain, a Jewish publishing propaganda outlet. I would guess this must certainly have been funded by Jews until its usefulness ran out. Here's more on Victor Gollancz and on other Jewish propaganda designed to support war for Jewish interests. ...

1936   The Jewish Masque; or, the Ass in the Lion's Skin seems to have been published, in 1936, anonymously. A short book, with information based on early 20th century archaeological and ancient language research in the middle east. Probably by a British writer; possibly someone taking information from the British Museum on regions such as Babylon and Assyria. A lot on early etymology, but all as far as I know unsourced. The thesis is 'Jews' were uncreative, and plagiarists from other societies, in language (for example place names, calendar names and copied celebrations such as 'Purim'), habits, and religious beliefs.

1937 ... In late 1937, Penguin Specials (paperbacks with red colouring on their covers) were started. S1 was Germany Puts the Clock Back by Edgar Ansel Mowrer. This book had been published in the USA in 1933; I haven't attempted to check whether the British edition was different. Mowrer seems to have been just another frivolous rentahack incompetent; maybe Jewish, maybe not. Later, Penguin Specials were sharply focussed on Jewish propaganda, not by journalists so much as full-time 'research' liars.

1937   A Belgian, Henri Pirenne, had published, posthumously, Mohammed and Charlemagne, switching emphasis to the rise of Islam, away from 'barbarians' as helping explain the collapse of the Roman Empire. This belief is more natural to European continental historians than to Britons: in France, in particular, Muslims both invaded, and were in addition defeated, in a fairly short space of time. (I don't vouch for the book's date, or language of publication, or title!) The Jewish Khazar Empire was formed by conversion at about the same time, postdating the invention of Islam. I'd suggest that the availability of relics of a huge empire encouraged the idea of what is now called 'parasitism'. The 'sacred' books encoded and crystallised parasitism, and inbreeding made it, over the centuries, a genetic part of these book-based cults. Few people in 1937 were aware of both hypotheses.

1937 'Eugene Lyons' Assignment in Utopia published (in English, in the west). Long book by a Jew who seems to have been Russian-speaking brought up in Lower East Side New York. He was of course a friend of the Soviet Union and the rest of it; and spent about six years in the USSR. He changed tack and became anti-USSR; or perhaps anti-Stalin and pro-Jew; who knows. [ Here's an extract: '... Absolutism at the top implies hundreds of thousands, even millions. of large and small autocrats in a state that monopolizes all means of life and expression, work and pleasure, rewards and punishments. centralized autocratic rule must function through a human machine of delegated authority, a pyramid of graded officialdom, each layer subservient to those above and overbearing to those below. Unless there are brakes of genuinely democratic control and the corrective of a hard-and-fast legality to which everyone, even the anointed of the Lord, is subjected, the machine of power becomes an engine of oppression. Where there is only one employer, namely, the State, meekness is the first law of economic survival. Where the same group of officials wields the terrible power of secret arrests and punishments, disfranchisement, hiring and firing, assignment of ration categories and living space—only an imbecile or some one with a perverted taste for martyrdom will fail to kow-tow to them. ...' Note the comment on 'anointed of the Lord', rather than 'Chosen people'. Elsewhere Lyons adds a footnote giving only a small percent of the bureaucracy as Jews. He comments on the Ukraine famine and Walter Duranty.]

1938   Bertrand Russell's Power was his attempt at starting a new science, of human power. As Adam Smith (arguably) founded economics. Russell was absurdly naive about Jews (see Russell as dupe of Jews). However, an important fact worth noting here is that he put military power as primary. ('Economic power, unlike military power, is not primary, but derivative.') The equipment, planning, training, learning, manpower, and general support aspects are minimised. (He does notice that coal in British ships, Rumanian oil and Germany, control of food-growing areas etc are important). But the tendency of his book is to minimise analysis of armies and navies—part of the gung-ho psychology of the Second World War, at the end of which many people awoke slowly to the unpleasant facts of impoverishment.
      I'd suggest this was part of Churchill's psychology: his violent hatreds and love of force and synthetic oratory may have been genetic, but after the 'Second World War' (his expression) the more British part of his nature disliked the plan of forced immigration ('keep Britain white' was also his expression), and subservience to Jewish US money.

1938  'George Orwell' (Eric Blair)  Homage to Catalonia and other books. George Orwell as useful idiot (Account of Orwell's life from a Jewish angle—all his publishers were Jews, his comments on Jews were of no value. Miles Mathis drew attention to Blair's family's financial interest in timber in Burma.)

1938  Oscar Levy  The Idiocy of Idealism  (Included to show an example of supposed Jewish intellectuality, which in fact is little more than a sequence of Jewish-centred assertions and non-sequiturs. One claim of Levy's is that the Germans took their race ideas from Jews—and look what suffering they've been through!)

1938  Cecil Roth  The Jewish Contribution to Civilisation  (Feeble publication by British Jews in the same genre as black contributions, Muslim contributions etc).

Sept 1938   Münich Agreement. The Jewish-promoted myth of Neville Chamberlain's 'Appeasement of Hitler' has been used in support of numerous jewish-backed wars. So has the method of inventing unstable states, covertly ruled by Jews. A J P Taylor's The Second World War has a long chapter (the longest in his book) on The Crisis Over Czechoslovakia, which doesn't mention the formation of that pseudo-state, and is laced with references to Hitler's demands, appeasement, threats, and national states without any reference to the overview money power. Plus the assertion that nobody wanted war, except Hitler. Per contra the following is extracted from tomatobubble.com/id304.html.
    [After World War I, the victorious allies redrew the map of Central & Eastern Europe. The artificial state of "Czechoslovakia" was invented in 1918, combining Czechs, Germans & Slovaks. Additional minorities of Romanians, Hungarians, and Poles were also forced into this 'Frankenstein' state. The German portion (formerly part of the Austro-Hungarian Empire) was a long strip of northern Czechoslovakia known as "Sudetenland", i.e. south-eastern Germany.
    During the mid 1930s, a closet Communist named Edvard Beneš is President of Czechoslovakia. Under his regime, Germans endure brutal attacks and oppression at the hands of Marxists. The 3,500,000 Sudetenland Germans wished to join their German brothers under Hitler's Reich, but are denied the right of self determination by the pro-Stalinist Beneš government.
    During this time, Jewish & Globalist warmongers in Great Britain are manouvring Britain into a war against Germany. The Czechoslovakia-Sudetenland controversy is the perfect "hot spot" to get the war started. Czech Marxists intensify their abuse of the helpless Germans.
    Hitler is pushed to the brink by the deliberate abuse of the Sudetenland Germans. He threatens to liberate the Sudetenland by force, a move that could lead to war with Britain, France, and the USSR. In an 11th hour attempt to avoid war, Hitler invites three European leaders for a conference in Munich.
    The Munich Conference is attended by four European heads of State. Hitler, Mussolini of Italy, Daladier of France, and Chamberlain of Britain meet in good faith for the purpose of resolving the crisis triggered by the artificial gangster State of Czechoslovakia.
    Hitler and Chamberlain keep the peace! The parties agree that the Sudetenland should be united with Germany, and that the Slovaks should have their own State, the Slovak Republic (1939-1945). The fake Czechoslovakian state is dissolved and Germany later establishes autonomous protectorates over what remains (Bohemia and Moravia). Without a shot being fired, Germans are welcomed into the Reich, while ethnic Czechs and Slovaks also get their own states. Even the minority Poles and Hungarians then join their respective father nations. The Munich Agreement is a win-win-win-win-win for all 5 of Czechoslovakia's ethnic groups!
    The rat Beneš soon exiles himself in London, where he resumes plotting with the Jewish warmongers who welcome him with open arms.
    Upon his return to Britain, Chamberlain is greeted by jubilant crowds. He applauds the Munich Agreement as "peace in our time". All throughout Europe, Chamberlain is praised for his calm diplomacy. [The photo of Chamberlain waving his 'piece of paper' is a firmly-established part of the Jew system of lies about Europe and war -RW]
    Meanwhile, the degenerate, drunken, cigar chomping Winston Churchill denounces Neville Chamberlain, "You were given the choice between war and dishonour. You chose dishonour and you will have war." [It's ghastly to see someone like Churchill misusing 'honour'—but typically jewish.]
    British historian David Irving later discovered that the warmongering Czech government had been secretly funneling money to the warmongering Churchill, who was plotting to replace Chamberlain. It was Churchill and his Jewish bosses who wanted war, not Hitler!
    In the summer of 1939, the Globalist warmongers manipulate Poland (which also holds an oppressed German minority captive) into provoking Hitler, exactly as Czechoslovakia had done in 1938. Once again, Hitler calls for an emergency conference. But by this time around, poor Neville Chamberlain's hands have been tied by the powerful pro-war forces in Britain. Less than 1 week before the conflict erupts, Chamberlain had been manoeuvred into signing a military defense pact with Poland. There will be no peace talks!
    By September 1 of 1939, the killing of Germans at the hands of Polish-Jewish Communist militias becomes so widespread that Hitler is forced to invade. Britain and France immediately declare war upon Germany. The gloating Churchill boasts of how his self fulfilling-prophecy regarding the danger of "appeasement" has come to pass. [Note that the issue was considered important enough to wreck much of the world—a typically revealing Jew-propagandist attitude.]

1939   David Irving on The Zionist Influence Over Winston Churchill (c. 10 mins) including the Focus

23 August 1939   Molotov-Ribbentrop non-aggression 'Pact', the 'Nazi-Soviet Pact'. [ As revisionism increases, the possibility that Hitler was yet another Jew agent has to be considered. For example, Hitler's speeches offering peace terms may have been aimed at Germans to make them feel virtuous, just as jewish propaganda in Britain was aimed to make the British feel virtuous.
    The point of the 'pact' was to allow Germany to invade the part of Poland containing Germans. This of course is not usually stated by conventional Jew-funded 'historians'. After the Sudetenland issue was settled, this was the next Jewish point of attack.
      Probably the 'Pact' was to allow Jews to arm both sides, the USSR and Germany, to maximise white deaths. Note that the Jewish publication Time put Hitler on its front cover; and there was a Nobel Peace Price recommendtaion. Very likely this was part of the same scheme.]


1939 "in 1939... Hitler and the Nazis dumped over 500,000 homeless jews illegally into Poland is the hidden, unspoken, real reason WHY the Polish-German war began." Secretly, by train; so at least says Indrek Pringi. Somewhat reminiscent of Jews in the USA importing non-whites by airplane at night.

1 Sept 1939   Germany invaded Poland. There was long-term hatred of Poles against ethnic Germans in Poland; and in particular border crossings and atrocities, usually attributed to Poles, but of course likely to have been Jews behaving as they did in the USSR. Computer searching for 'Polish atrocities 1939' finds many examples. Naturally the incidents starting a war are even more likely to be propagandised than those during a war.

3 Sept 1939   Britain declares war on Germany without quite saying so ("We are now at war with Germany") and France declares war at the same time, something many British people are not aware of. German diplomats spent months trying to negotiate peace.

December 1939  Hewlett Johnson's The Socialist Sixth of the World published by Victor Gollancz, in London. 20 impressions up to November 1944 (print run not stated). Hewlett Johnson, the 'red Dean' of Canterbury, was a 'useful idiot' of the type useful for Jewish propagandists such as Gollancz. Johnson had a wealthy family background, in factories, science, and engineering, and assembled USSR material in convincing-sounding but uncheckable format.

1939 & 1940  H G Wells  The Jewish Influence  (Extracts from two books by Wells, including The New World Order of 1940. Wells honestly faces the problem of Jewish selfishness vs. his ideal of world co-operation. Note the suggestions he disputes by other authors writing at that time, e.g. in Penguin Special paperbacks—unlimited immigration, Palestine, Jewish violence etc.)

1940  Senator J. Thorkelson inserted into the Congressional Record nine articles, under the overall title Steps Toward British Union, a World State, and International Strife. His intention was to prove that a weakened Britain, and influential Jews in Britain, wanted to use the military strength of the United States to start the Second World War (as opposed to the European War) to assist them in putting together a World State. Most of the articles deal with the British Empire and its 'Dominions' and 'Commonwealth of Nations', and with well-funded pressure and quasi-religious groups—'The Pilgrims of the United States', 'The Anglo-Israel Society', 'British Israel World Federation'.
    One of the nine articles looked at crypto-Jews in Britain's aristocracy. It's possible this article influenced, or was taken from, the German author Friedrich Wilhelm Euler, who published similar, but longer, material in 1941. The untitled article, without comment by Thorkelson, was by the Imperial Fascist Union of London, England; author(s) not stated.
The theme is Jews in the aristocracy and powerful positions in Britain. There are cut-down versions online; as far as I know, this is the only full version. THORKELSON MATERIAL NOT YET COMPLETE!

1940   Arnold Leese's book Gentile Folly: The Rothschilds was published. As an example, Chapter 9 is Gentile Intermarriages with the Rothschilds

1940   William Joyce's Twilight over England published in Berlin. England is described from Cromwell to ‘the fateful and fatal action which her Government took on September 3rd 1939’. It takes in the 18th century, Eton and Harrow (as it was), industrialism, the assembling of the 'Labour Party' and the Jewish reactions, the 'Great War' and depression, though Joyce doesn't quite manage to separate out central banking from capitalist funds, or to decide what to do about payments overseas on internally, or what to do abut weapons. Joyce was convinced of ‘Hitler's superhuman heroism’. I don't know if this belief survived the war, up to his execution; perhaps he developed doubts.

1940, May   British Security Coordination (BSC) set up in New York, to move opinion in the USA towards war with Germany; or at least that's the story. This was the time of the 'Phoney War'. It was only a small part of the Jewish effort to provoke war against Germany. It is essential to differentiate Jewish interests from white British: without this, the loss of the 'British' Empire is incomprehensible. Hitler wanted the British Empire to be left alone; Roosevelt's Jews wanted it for themselves rather than 'British' Jews. To this day there's little discussion of profits made by Jews from the Second World War, and the costs imposed in the long term against all European countries.

1940, July 20th   Churchill telegrams Lord Lothian in the US Embassy, telling him not to contact the German Ambassador for peace terms. And summons Lord Portal, aiming to provoke Hitler to bomb British towns. Churchill gets his chance when east London is bombed accidentally; next day (Aug 25 1940) orders bombers to bomb Berlin, bypassing Parliament. Among other warmongering things. (From David Irving).

1940   Slow emergence of various 'Jewish' groups, such as 'Haganah'. A relatively well-known incident is the blowing up of the SS Patria at Haifa Harbour, containing what are described as 3000 Jewish refugees.

1940   Lev Davidovich Bronstein (The name, 'Brownstone', sounds left over from a German surname assignment. The Russian nickname Trotsky concealed his Jewishness). A wealthy Jew from Ukrania, Bronstein presumably was, among other things, active in the Holodomor, and was murdered in Mexico by an agent of Stalin, if the story is true.
    This event seems to me misinterpreted: it's true that 'Jews' show remarkable pack unity. However, it seems theoretically impossible they should always agree what course of action is 'best for Jews'. Probably there are far more intra-Jew murders than the heavily-censored official accounts suggest. In fact, a possible strategy against Jews is to carefully increase internal dissensions up to a civil war level.

1940   Freda Utley's book The Dream We Lost - Soviet Russia Then and Now b. 1898, she wrote several books, several on Japan and/or China. In fact, her book was either naive or propagandist, saying nothing about the Jews and their mass murders in the 'Soviet Union'—or the Jewish propaganda control of the USA. She may have thought she was Jewish, judging by comments in her biographies, and 'scrubbing' of information on her mother.

1941   Second World War Revisionism seems to be starting. David Irving: June 22 1941: start of BARBAROSSA, launched by Adolf Hitler, now known to have thwarted the Judeo-Bolshevik plans to invade Europe. On June 13, Soviet radio broadcast an odd, panicky Tass announcement denying rumours that Germany was about to attack. Since April 1941, the Russians had moved rifle divisions and airborne corps under cover of darkness and camouflage right up to their western frontier. Eight new armies were being created, of sixty-nine tank, motorised, and rifle divisions, the entire Ural Army District and the army's first and second Strategic Echelons (an operational military formation created only when an operation is imminent) were secretly brought westwards and hidden in forests near the frontier in Byelo-Russia and the Ukraine. Their target was western Europe.
      They had better maps of Berlin than the Germans. By June 17, one hundred and seventy Soviet divisions were secretly in place, right on the frontier; it was "the biggest troop movement by a single state in the history of civilisation." The due date for completion of this build-up, which was irreversible and could not be undone, was July 10, 1941. By then Stalin had twenty-three armies and more than twenty independent corps in place to attack the Germans. But the Germans attacked first, on June 22, 1941. This is now confirmed by Soviet military archives seen by East German historians, but still ignored by their embarrassed colleagues in the west. Millions of airmen and soldiers died in the resulting military holocaust. By October 1941 Hitler's strike had nearly succeeded. Then Stalin regained his composure and flung the tattered survivors of his armies at the weakened enemy, and with the help of Britain and the United States.
      "The Soviet-German War, 1941-1945: Myths and Realities" by Col. (Ret) David M. Glantz is a Youtube video, quoted by Youtuber 'The History Reviewed Channel'. However, this looks almost certain to be Jew-naive. A website about Glantz's writing is here. 'A staggering forty percent of the historic record about the German eastern front remained shrouded in mystery. Col. (Ret) David Glantz seeks to unearth this information and dispel myths that have perpetuated the Soviet-German War of 1941-1945. This conflict encompassed immense scale, scope and consequence.' ]


1941   The so-called "torch-men order" (Fackelmännerbefehl) is the command No. 0428, issued November 17th, 1941 by Stalin. It declares that Russian partisans in German uniforms, particularly those of the Waffen-SS, were to destroy all settlements within a swathe of about 40-60 km depth from the main battle lines and to ruthlessly kill the civilian population. With these tactics it was important to leave a few survivors, which would report the supposed German terror attacks. This method of warfare was also confirmed by German soldiers who captured many Russian partisans wearing German uniforms. See www.codoh.com

1941 December 11th 1941 Hitler's Reichstag speech on war now existing between Germany and the USA. Translated by Mark Weber. Journal of Historical Review 1988/89 with some revisions later. [The speech by Hitler declaring war on the USA—absurd?–was not translated accurately or fully by the Anglophone media. Like most people, I'd assumed this was to prevent people understanding Hitler's points, for example on Roosevelt's illegal campaign against German shipping. But if Hitler was a Jewish agent—like the other participants, Roosevelt, Stalin, Churchill—it may have had a different purpose. Probably both the USSR and Germany had been fully armed, and dissidents in the USSR killed or GULag'd, and Germans controlled. The Jewish principals may have decided it was time for white deaths, including of and by Americans, who of course could now be forced to live in tents and fight. ]

1943  Charles Singer The Christian Failure  (Singer was an historian of medicine. This book however looks at Christianity and concludes it failed. Singer does not distinguish tribal cults from larger scale systems. He is careful to never notice that Jewish immigrants are a cost to their host countries. Worth reading to see amusing comments on e.g. the Archbishop of Canterbury, and entirely self-centred commentaries)

1944   Anglo-American CIOS (Combined Intelligence Operations Subcommittee) and JIOC (Joint Intelligence Objectives Committee) set up or enlarged to find and confiscate patents and devices in Germany. Later they assembled FIAT units (Field Intelligence Agencies, technical).
    [ See the work of Daniel W. Michaels. Michaels wrote: Americans today find it hard to believe that this country was once a laggard nation in science and industrial innovations... America under President Franklin Roosevelt had failed to pull the country out of the ... depression ... the [US] economy, ... on a wartime basis, was unsurpassed in its volume of production, [but] its products, including wartime hardware, were inferior to those of the German war machine. Mass production—quantity rather than quality—characterized American manufacturing. This of course applied to the USSR too. ]

1944  Spaight's book Bombing Vindicated

1944   Education Act, in Britain, not relevant to University or 'further' education. ... See 1963

1944/45  Morgenthau Plan written about now; four Jews principally involved, Harry Dexter White, Henry R Morgenthau Jr, Eisenhower, and Churchill. Free download in German on David Irving's website. Der Morgenthau-Plan 1944/45 Amerikanische Deutschlandpolitik: Sühneleistungen, »re-education«, Auflösung der deutschen Wirtschaft. [ =The Morgenthau Plan 1944/45 American Germany policy: Atonement, re-education, dissolution of the German economy ]. Interesting to compare the still-partly-secret plans, and compare them with Jews' actions at the present day. David Irving says: 'many parts of the British foreign office files relating to it are still closed to public inspection, an exception to the general thirty-year rule.' The plan included sterilisation of Germans by 20,000 surgeons, or more likely trained operatives, performing 25 operations a day: in three months the males, and at a lower speed, three years the females, could be sterilised.
      Note that Henry Morgenthau Sr was part of the vast Jewish influence on Wilson, wanting the 'Great War'. As a small note, the full version of the 'R' in Morgenthau's seems to be elusive.
The sterilisation plan might be borne in mind if Jews finally face serious opposition in future.

1944-1948   Anglo-Israel War   (There's no accepted name for this war, as Israel didn't exist. 784 British police officers, servicemen, Crown servants and civilian staff were killed by Jewish terrorists in the Palestine Mandate crisis between 1944–48 (figures from Francis Carr Begbie). The following external site, written by Dave Martin, comments on murder attempts on Truman, Bevin etc, which have been kept secret, as was Forrestal's murder).
    Contrary to Jewish media assertions, Jewish treatment of Palestinians is far worse than the Nazis treatment of Jews. There was no equivalent of the killings and atrocities by Jews of Palestinians (Deir Yassin, April 9, 1948 is the least censored of many events) to cause Jews to flee from Germany, in the way Palestinians were made to flee. (The wars against Iraq, Libya, Syria, and so on are also intended to clear land, on a far larger scale - note added 1016). After about 2000 Auschwitz etc admittedly made Jews work, but the camps were the safest places in Germany, and were shielded from the allied bombing of the rest of Germany.
    Palestinians of course are bombed, maimed etc. There is as yet no systematic extraction of money from Jews to pay compensation for the actual treatment of Palestinians, much less for stories which Palestinians might make up, publish and film in future. (al-Naqba or al-Nakba apparently means something like 'the catastrophe' and is celebrated, if that's the word, on May 14th. I haven't found where the term originated. It's not the sort of thing mentioned in the Jewish-controlled media, obviously, and gets low-level publicity in the way the 'Holodomor' does. A side-effect of Jewish genetic inability to see, and therefore remember, the other person's point of view, is an accumulation of such memories, among other peoples, in many regions).

1945  USA Jews begin The hoax of nuclear weapons at Hiroshima and Nagasaki  (By A combination of press and, later, TV lies, and prolonged censorship, this fraud started at this point. Attlee, in the UK, started a secret project in 1947. Attlee worked with the Webbs and others and it can be confidently stated that Jewish credit must have been secretly involved. As far as I know public debunking began in 2005: 'Father' of nuke revisionism)

1945  David Irving  Nuremberg—The Last Battle  (Detailed definitive account, published in 1996) of the proceedings over several years in which the supposed belief in international justice was overturned by Jews in the USA and USSR. Marks the start of the fraud of what later came to be called 'the Holocaust')

1945   After the destruction of Germany, assets were looted, including entire factories for the USSR. Technology was taken or copied, for example rocketry, water and sewage processing, autobahnen, and electron microscopes—these latter were to have, and still have to this date, a disastrous effect on biology research. "The Great Patent Heist": President Harry Truman's Executive Order 9604. Aug 25th 1945.

British 'Daily Telegraph' March 1946. Typical of press untruth—Jewish issues are censored.
censorship of Jews
1945-1951   'Labour' Government in Britain under Clement Attlee. Often falsely claimed to be a 'landslide'. [ Jew-related policies were genocide in occupied Germany; nuclear pretence so that the Jewish USSR (so-called 'Union of Soviet Socialist Republics', Soviet Russia) could continue its policies; 1948 Nationality Act gave everyone in the ex-empire the 'right' to move to Britain; social insurance probably designed secretly to support future immigrants. ]

1946-1948   Staged War Crimes Trials in Tokyo. It's obvious that some killings of Japanese leaders were tactical: for example, Iwane Matsui, supposed organiser of the fictional 'Rape of Nanking' must presumably have been deliberately vanished. And there are parallels with the staged Nuremburg 'trials'. [ Revisionism of wars between China, Japan, Korea (and also Russia, then, later, the Jewish USSR) is, at least in the 'west', only just beginning, as far as I know. But the whole perception of WW2 in the east is likely to be different from the west, ranging from the dates ascribed to wars, the penetration by Jewish finances and their puppets, the use of local newly manufactured elites, to perceptions of the outcome of wars—for example, losses of European empires and exchange for US-based Jewish empires, and actions (e.g. Russo-Japanese War, Pearl Harbor, covert fomentation of wars, the nuclear hoax, Korea and Vietnam genocides). ]

1946, or 1947   Eric Butler's pamphlet The International Jew: The Truth About the "Protocols of Zion" was published in Australia. I haven't found a copy online; it appears to be based on the Protocols of Zion, perhaps an update of Henry Ford. I mention it because a 'Jew' online claims Butler said that Hitler was himself a tool of the [sc. Jewish] conspiracy and was seeking to further the international dispersal of Jews.

1947   Borge Jenzen (or Jensen)'s book The World Food Shortage: A Communist-Zionist Plot is published, a commentary on Jews since the 1917 coup in Russia, in particular the controls by Jewish cartels and trusts, big land schemes like Tennessee Valley Authority, prevention of land tenure by independent farmers, and so on. The reader can judge how much of this material has been officially censored by the media, 'education', etc. My HTML version with links of this typical title by the Britons Publishing Society.

1947   Ralph Franklin Keeling Gruesome Harvest: The Costly Attempt to Exterminate the People of Germany published by the Institute of American Economics in Chicago. Almost seventy years later the topic is still taboo in the Jewish media.

1947   Example of the slow ingress of revisionism British Colonel John C. Scott who gave an election speech on August 14, 1947 revealed the real underlying issues of the World War II. Scott claimed that at the conclusion of military operations in Poland a war by telegram was waged between the Allies and the German Foreign Office. He was one of the transmitters in those negotiations. The Allies gave the Reich two conditions, and their acceptance would have brought about an immediate cessation of hostilities, and a free rein for Germany in Poland. Those conditions were, Germany must return to the Gold Standard and the League of Freemasonry must be readmitted to Germany. This was not published until November 6, 1947 in Tomorrow, which closed its article by stating "Some 55 million people had to die to make the Gold Standard in Germany permissible." [NB I haven't looked for the original source. The story itself sounds doubtful.]

1947   Jews in India taken from Wikipedia, for what it's worth. I list them in very shortened form.
S W tip of India: ... might have arrived in India with Solomon's merchants, settling in Kerala as traders. 'Whites' may be European or other [sic] Jewish descent.
S E India: Spanish and Portuguese Jews, Paradesi Jews and British Jews arrived at Madras/Chennai during the 16th century, after expulsion from Iberia in 1492 by the Alhambra Decree. Spoke Ladino (i.e. Spanish or Judeo-Spanish), learned Tamil and Judeo-Malayalam from Malabar (Coast south of Goa).
Goa: Portuguese Jews who moved to Goa. May have been tried by the Portuguese Inquisition.
With the East India Co, Baghdad, Iran, Afghanistan Jews moved to Surat (west coast).
In 1947, when 'Pakistan' was invented, Jews from Karachi (sea coast) and inland moved, on Partition, typically to Mumbai.
There are other later converts; I don't know who recognises them.

1948   British Nationality Act stated every person who is a citizen of the UK or Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the Union of South Africa, Newfoundland, India, Pakistan, Southern Rhodesia and Ceylon, 'shall have the status of a British subject'.   [ At the time, populations were, roughly, Britain: 50 M; India 350M; Pakistan (the name was completely artificially made up: Punjab, Afghanistan, Kashmir, Sindh, Baluchistan) 37M; Australia, 8M; Canada 13M; New Zealand, 2 million; South Africa, 28M largely black.
      A complex of activities, now recognisable as the Coudenhove-Kalergi scheme, took place: 1946 Bank of England Act; often misnamed Bank of England Nationalisation Act. And 1946 National Insurance Act, effective from 5 July 1948. And 1948 British Nationality Act, and National Assistance Act. On June 1948, on Jewish cue, the 'Empire Windrush' from the Caribbean docked in London at Tilbury. See Andrew Joyce's writings. ]


1948   Borge Jenzen (or Jensen)'s book The "Palestine" Plot is published. It includes Khazar material. And also Arab protests against Asian 'Jews' moving to Palestine. And the way the invention of Israel was not debated in Parliament. [ Jenzen/Jensen also wrote The World Food Shortage, a Communist-Zionist Plot ]

1948 Judge Gordon A. Simpson of Texas chaired the 'Simpson Commission'. One of the few cases where Jews involved in torture were identified; Jewish media control has of course censored such Jewish activity.

1948   Smith-Mundt Act [U.S. Information and Educational Exchange Act of 1948 (Public Law 80-402). Was and is (in many amended forms) law distinguishing propaganda outside the USA from within the USA. Jews naturally want their countries to be individual targets of their lies.]

1951 Refugee Convention   The United Nations definition, is:
[ a person who is outside his or her country of nationality or habitual residence; has a well-founded fear of being persecuted because of his or her race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion; and is unable or unwilling to avail him—or herself of the protection of that country, or to return there, for fear of persecution. (Article 1A(2)). I'd suggest this is primarily a way to allow Jew criminals, liars, organised thugs etc escape to other countries. That explains why it's ignored by Jewish promoters of race replacement. ]

1951   John Beaty Iron Curtain over America (1951) includes Chapter II Russia and the Khazars, his sources given as Jewish writers and Encyclopaedias, some Jewish. [ His book is in the strident post-1945 American style as filtered by Jews and recommended by Generals. I include it as evidence that the Khazar theory was known in 'post-war' USA. Beaty is/was Roman Catholic, which of course weakens his whole appreciation. ]

1952   Jew Rupert Murdoch aged about 21 takes over Australia's News Limited. There's a possible connection with Dien Bien Phu in 1954 and Australian complicity in war crimes in Korea and Vietnam. Murdoch corrupted—or simply used—two or three generations of hack journalists in covering up corruption, war crimes, and other Jewish activities. One of the most repulsive lumps of shit in journalistic history. And part of the Jewish paper and e-money frauds and buying-up of media.

1952   Captain Archibald Henry Maule Ramsay: The Nameless War published, a history including Cromwell and Jews, Napoleon and the French Revolution's 'nonsensical slogans', the absorption of the British aristocracy (of which Ramsay was a member), and including of course Germany and the Second World War. Ramsay did his best to ask questions in Parliament, and otherwise agitate. In the tradition of Nesta Webster. For my taste, lacking in notes on sources, and lacking his own personal investigative landmarks to show how his ideas developed. But nonetheless a very powerful book.

1952?  Frank Britton  Behind Communism  (This is an online version of a privately-printed illustrated US booklet, dating from about 1952, based on the Encyclopaedia Britannica and several Jewish encyclopedias—all of course at the time in hardcopy form. Britton deals with the history of east European Jews and Khazaria, and 'Jewish' actions against Russia up its collapse in 1917. Britton does not deal much with finances—these of course are heavily censored: the Federal Reserve, paper money, loans to Japan for the Russo-Japanese War, Lenin's sources of money and so on are not discussed. Note that Britton assumes the 'Red' army fought whites—very likely the truth is they wanted to parasitise small nations. Britton added post-war, post-1945, material including Jews in eastern Europe—Hungary, Poland, Rumania, Yugoslavia, and Czechoslovakia—and Jews in Hollywood, in propaganda, US 'communist' Jewish politics, and so-called Jewish 'atom spies' whose role is now known to have been to prevent the USSR being democratised by the few Americans who might have been serious about democracy)

1952   Friedrich Lenz self-publishes shortish book, translated into English many years later, as Worm in the Apple. German Traitors and Other Influences That Pushed the World Into War: The little-known story of the men who destroyed Adolf Hitler's Germany. Just one part of the erratic fight against Jewish propaganda.

1952   Queen Elizabeth II crowned in Britain. A paper by Miles Mathis gives some genealogical evidence of Jewish descent.

1954   'Lavon Affair' named after a 'Jew' Pincher Lavon. False flag against Egypt which may have been intended to fail, since Jewish media control could play it (as with the nuclear myth) to control beliefs amongst 'Jews'/amongst the white public.

1954, June   Churchill stated to journalists in the United States that "I am a Zionist, let me make that clear. I was one of the original ones after the Balfour Declaration and I have worked faithfully for it." [Various Internet sources give this quotation]

Cold War and Civil Defense campaigns, after Jews in the USSR pretended they had 'the' H-bomb, start in earnest to make money for Jews and collaborators.

1955  Edward Bernays  Engineering of Consent  (Typical part of the system of propaganda, deceit and media control arranged by Jews in the USA)

October 1956   Hungarian Revolution against Jewish rule in Hungary.

October 1956-7   The Suez Crisis  Attack on Egypt  By Britain, France, and Israel. Suez is a perfect example of an event needing deep revisionism to understand. Eisenhower, an absolutely typical Jew liar, nevertheless seems to have disapproved; he at least gave that impression, perhaps because Israel was clearly too aggressive, a coloniser, and not an innocent victim, and because it was clear that 'Britain' and 'France' collaborated with Israel. Khrushchev in the Jew-run USSR allegedly threatened nuclear action: probably therefore the Jews in both USA and USSR collaborated to damage Britain and France. One would have thought that, after WW1 and WW2, this was hardly necessary; but it seems to have made Jewish loans to Britain, and Jewish influence in the USSR, more secure. Britain's Prime Minister, Anthony Eden, b. 1897, allegedly had mental illness issues after Suez; possibly, after devotion to Churchill, he began to glimpse the truth. (Nasser nationalised the Suez Canal. It's typical of the perpetually low-grade commentariat that the actual effects of this move were not discussed in the media)

1957   Sweden was one of the first countries in which anti-Apartheid movements started 'spontaneously'; presumably by Jews, notably the Bonnier media family. This date is selected more or less arbitrarily, since, if there had been a defining date, it would be kept secret. Note how covert Jewish pressure always acts against the Swedes themselves: consider the present-day situation in Sweden. And bear in mind that Sweden was neutral in the Second World War. [ From Wikipedia: In 1957, Swedish missionary Gunnar Helander was barred reentry to South Africa due to his affiliation with anti-apartheid activists. Helander later threw his support behind the 1960 Nobel Peace Prize being awarded to the peaceful struggle of Albert Luthuli, the prominent ANC politician. ... Pär Westberg, who went on to found the Swedish chapter of Amnesty International, met South African literary giant Nadine Gordimer in the late 1950s. She introduced him to Nelson Mandela... Note the Jewish policy of unrestrained praise for their puppets—Jew-aware people know that persons given awards and prizes and unearned degrees and media praise are Jew puppets. ]

1958   Harry Elmer Barnes (1889-1968), prolific author of books on the First and Second World Wars, and on more general history, wrote on historical revisionism: Revisionism means nothing more or less than the effort to correct the historical record in the light of a more complete collection of historical facts, a more calm political atmosphere, and a more objective attitude.

1958 Allied Wartime Diplomacy: A Pattern in Poland by Edward J. Rozek first published. Reprinted a circular from Britain's Ministry of Information (Feb 29 1944) to the BBC and 'higher clergy'. Telling them to hide USSR atrocities as a policy matter.
      "We know how the Red Army behaved in Poland in 1920 and in Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Galicia and Bessarabia only recently. ... the Red Army will certainly behave [in the same way] when it overruns Central Europe. ... The disclosures of the past quarter of a century will render mere denials unconvincing. The only alternative to denial is to distract public attention from the whole subject. ... the best distraction is atrocity propaganda directed against the enemy. Unfortunately the public is no longer so susceptible as in the days of the "Corpse Factory," and the "Mutilated Belgian Babies," and the "Crucified Canadians." ... Your cooperation is therefore earnestly sought to distract public attention from the doings of the Red Army by your wholehearted support of various charges against the Germans and Japanese which have been and will be put into circulation by the Ministry."
      This seems to have been an Internet rediscovery: here's a typical online image of the relevant facing pages. It's probable the continued decline in Church of England attendance, and decrease in gullibility about the BBC, were reinforced as some wartime stories leaked out, though of course much is still secret.

1959  In Britain, a special police squad was set up to investigate Peter Rachman, a Jew from Ukrainia, using Jew printed money to exploit housing shortages in London. In the late 1950s Rachman was involved in prostitution, and I suspect murder—see my previous link reviewing the Christie murder case, and its Jewish media promotion, partly to remove the death penalty.

1960  Herman Kahn   On Thermonuclear War  [ Herman Kahn, a Hungarian Jew, on the mythical H bomb. At least two functions: to make fortunes for Jews operating 'nuclear' industries, and to ensure US military will co-operate with the USSR ]

1961  Benjamin Freedman  A Jewish Defector Warns America  (Brisk overview of First and Second World Wars, and Jewish manoeuvres to get the goyim to fight. Includes added map of Jewish trade sanction effects. Defence of Germany and the Germans. Freedman was suckered into the nuclear myth, however—or was he? Looking again, I think this was a psyop: no mention of Rothschilds, or funding all sides in wars; or repayment terms; or jewish effects to cause 'Great Depression'; or arming the USSR; or the 'Holocaust'; or its use to hide mass killings; or suspect nuclear weapons claims... (Improved version including Question and Answer session)

17 Jan 1961  Dwight D. Eisenhower's Farewell Address to the Nation.
      [ Revisionist interpretation from tomatobubble.com in I Don't Like Ike: The speech was worked on for months, by Milton Eisenhower and speechwriter Malcolm Moos. Moos went on to write speeches for Nelson Rockefeller; work for the Ford Foundation; Presidency of Minnesota University (1967-1974), encouraging fake Jew activism and Jewish pseudo-academic studies in African American, Native American, Chicano, Women's, and Urban and Regional Studies.
      The point of the speech was to avoid mention of Jewish financial control and its ramifications world-wide—the banking-government-tax exempt foundation-academia-media-Zionist complex. Instead, to redirect legitimate concerns elsewhere: The problem is, there is not now and nor was there ever any "military-industrial complex" that could "endanger our liberties or democratic processes," for the simple reason that military generals/admirals and manufacturing CEO's can neither take America to war, nor dictate the size of defense budgets, nor influence politicians to do so. US war crimes in this way were not blamed on the likes of Kissinger, CIA heads, and so on. ]

1961  Arthur Koestler & Cecil Hewitt Rolph  Hanged by the Neck  (Typical attitude-change attempt by Jews, in order to weaken host societies. Manifestly hypocritical, since Jews murdered millions including German leaders. Contents are entirely hysterical as even the title illustrates)

1961 A J P Taylor   Origins of the Second World War   (Long detailed review of Taylor's fellow-traveller background and life, and this evasive book, which dodged the principal issues of the most destructive war so far)

1961  Howard Griffin Black Like Me   (Typical paperback propaganda. Like 'The Diary of Anne Frank' this is a phoney which has morphed into a money-spinner. There's a whole set of fraudulent books: 'T Lobsang Rampa' on Tibet is another example. However the black aspect is a bit depressing: all, or at least most, of the tear-jerking books on blacks are written by whites, starting with 'Uncle Tom's Cabin'. 'Cry the Beloved Country' was written by a white South African schoolteacher. 'To Kill a Mockingbird'—white author. 'Roots' was plagiarised from an early white novel. I seem to recall 'Amistad' was based on a white account. There's a novel on Haiti, by a white woman—but anyway you see the point. Martin Luther King's material was plagiarised from whites. Obama—well! This 1961 book is presumably part of the anti-race realist movement. Read it and observe the fakery!)

1962-1965   Second Vatican Council was supposedly held to clarify the position of the Roman Catholic Church in what was clearly rather different from the past. Obviously, it could not examine the full rationalist case. And unfortunately it made little serious attempt to examine Jewish frauds, notably of course what became known later as 'The Holocaust', and nuclear frauds. No wonder the churches became a mess! This is a convenient date to discuss Jews and Roman Catholics. (Orthodox churches seem to have been fairly effectively crushed, notably of course in Russia). [ Here are a few relevant dates:
    1936 The Jewish Peril and the Catholic Church (in the 'Catholic Gazette')
    1954 School of Darkness by Bella Dodd, b. 1904 in Italy. Chapter 15 shows her book is likely to have been a shrill reprisal to maltreatment by 'communists' (American Jews) rather than anything principled. This book does not contain her HUAC statement: "In the 1930s we put eleven hundred men into the priesthood in order to destroy the Church from within." Dodd has no idea that Communism was Jewish, and no understanding of 'fascism'; I'd guess her book was promoted more as a 'Cold War' buttress than as a serious book.
    1962 The Plot Against The Church, by Maurice Pinay.
There is a long tradition of Jews working their way into the Roman Catholic Church. So much so it seems entirely possible the whole edifice was to some extent a Jewish construction. Bear this is mind when considering child abuse allegations against supposedly Catholic priests, and other scandals. ]


1962   Roger Corman film  The Intruder also known as I Hate Your Guts and Shame  (Typical Jewish propaganda film as described by Frank Britton. Stars William Shatner (a Jew). All the characters are stereotypes of people in the USA. Just before the murder of J F Kennedy)

1962   E J Hobsbawm   The Age of Revolution 1789-1848—part of the post-war Jewish 'educational' scam. My hostile review.

1963 November. Lyndon Johnson 'swears to uphold the Constitution'. I've been assured Johnson was a Jew, and, something easier to check, a high-level Freemason.
      [ It's certainly consistent with his actions—indifference to mass war killing, provided Jews profited; attack on the Liberty, followed by refusal to take action; damage to blacks by subsidising single black parents only; removing Kennedy, to retain use of the Fed by Jews; Christian church legislation allowing tax exemption IF they kept politics out, to censor information about Jews; support for anti-white causes and so on. My Youtube of Daisy Girl political ad for LBJ. Shown once only, very likely to prevent close examination of visual fakery. ]

1963   David Irving's first book The Bombing of Dresden published by William Kimber.
      [ Looking back, this widely-publicised book may have been pushed for reasons unflattering to Irving. A few possibilities: [1] Distraction from USA's genocide in Vietnam, which was becoming known despite censorship by Jewish news sources; [2] White on white violence, a subject of rejoicing by Jews; [3] Distraction from mass killings by Jews and their puppets during and after World War 2, atrocities which by comparison Dresden was small beer; [4] 'Thirty year rule' may have opened archives on 1933, with multiple secrets including the Federal Reserve, gold hoarded by Jews, the British royals and aristocracy and Hitler; perhaps they were kept closed. ]

1963   Robbins Report on Higher Education published by HSMO ('Her Majesty's Stationery Office'). This was mostly platitudes (e.g. Wikipedia quotes 'in the graduate school there are no ultimate authorities, no orthodoxies to which the pupil must subscribe'). P R G Layard and Claud Moser seem to have been the main supporting acts, along with the LSE (London School of Economics). The popularity of Antonio Gramsci, such as it was, dates from around this time: presumably this was aimed at collaborators who wanted to be left-wing, whether genuinely or not, of the Ken Livingstone type. In fact, the main lines are usually imposed from the top, and the idea of Marxist infiltration, like the idea of spontaneously 'viral' videos or media fame, is a fake. Gramsci was discussed, like Marx, because he was regarded as useful.

1963   G R Elton  Reformation Europe 1517-1559  (My review. An example of the penetration of intellectual life by Jews—Elton's parents were Jews who lived in Germany. Textbooks written by Jews influenced the entire 'post-War' generation who attended the new universities).

1964   Arthur Cohen  Attitude Change and Social Influence  (Typical example of the malign use of psychology by Jews. Zimbardo, Milgram, the attribution of 'brainwashing' to the Chinese when it was in fact intended to silence protestors against US war crimes in Korea, are other examples)

1964  Warren Commission Report  (Set the standard for fake but official-seeming controlled investigative reports. It was to be followed by many more...)

1964   David Schwarz, a Polish-born Jew wrote "The Immigration problem in Sweden" in the Jewish-owned Dagens Nyheter (Daily News) using the Holocaust fraud as part of the evidence. An example of the propaganda part of the Jewish push for immigration. ('Streicher's Ghost' wrote this in destroyzionism.com Jan 2013).

1964  The Times They Are a-Changin by 'Bob Dylan'  (Probably a comment on Hart-Cellar nonwhite immigration policies by Jews)

1964-1966  The Pawnbroker black and white film first 'released' in Berlin in 1964.
    [ Interesting as Jewish multiple propaganda effort: note the experimental release, the anti-white aspects, the portentous quasi-seriousness, the small-scale cast—including Morgan Freeman!—and exploratory trials in aspects of 'Holocaust' mythology. In 1963 an Ann Frank charity had been set up without much in the way of challenge; The Pawnbroker is part of the same Jewish media fraud.
    on the Jewish Anti-White push—in this film it's anti-Europe—note that anti-white propaganda is a long-term project, rather like the demonisation of the Germans before and during the 20th century; and the Russians; and many other countries and groups. For example, many US blacks and Hispanics now believe that Whites dominated black slavery, and that blacks invented and originated most ideas, and black crime is insignificant, and other Jew-promoted falsities. The emphasis is controlled by Jews: White war crimes, when controlled by Jews, whether against whites or anyone else, are generally written out of Jewish media.]

1965   Hart-Cellar Act US Immigration Rules changed by Jewish pressure groups

Washington DC monuments
1965   Death of Winston Spencer-Churchill KG, OM, CH, TD, PC, DL, FRS, RA —note the absurd honorary titles. A revisionist process is the painful one of revising opinions of publically-praised persons.
    [ All European capitals, including London of course, and Anglosphere capitals, have memorials and monuments to people and events approved by what's now obviously Jewish-backed cliques. State funerals in Britain included George VI (1952), Churchill (1965), the 'Queen Mother' (2002), and Margaret Thatcher (2013). We have a statue of Churchill in Parliament Square, Churchill College in Cambridge (with the usual difficulty in finding 'notable alumni'), and even less elevated places such as London Churchill College ('directly involved in the East London community'), a 'Churchill Community College' in N.E. England, and a Churchill College in New Malden which looks like an 'English for Foreigners' outfit. And about six Churchill hotels, a few dozen Churchill roads, streets, and squares. ]

1966  Mishkin v. New York 383 U.S. 502 - Typical sample of Jewish pornography: pushed in USA by Jewish lawyers, media, judges.

1967  Bertrand Russell, J-P Sartre, Noam Chomsky, Ralph Schoenman, Isaac Deutscher, others  Vietnam War Crimes Tribunal  (Russell was 95 at this time. The Tribunal was dominated by Jews, and this may explain the lack of investigation into war profiteers, the role of Kissinger, profits from drugs and prostitution, the control of currency in Vietnam, and the desire for increased national debt to yield annual revenue to Jews). Unlike anti-goyim reports, this tribunal was virtually ignored).

1967  Time-Life's Rise of Russia (attributed to Robert Wallace, 'a staff writer'; UK edition) mentions Khazars and Jews in very similar terms to Koestler, about ten years later: '... In 558 came the Avars, large, powerful fighters ... On the track of the Avars came the Khazars.... [this may be an error, as Khazars seem to have not invaded their territory] ... The Khazar rulers, diplomatically evading a choice between the Christian and Islamic religions of their powerful neighbours, embraced Judaism. ... The Khazars were in control of the steppe from the mid-seventh century to the early tenth ...' It's unclear from the brief bibliography where this idea is quoted from; I mention it because it pre-dates Koestler, is taken for granted, and pre-dates the full Jewish Holocaust fraud. Naturally Jews and the so-called 'Russian Revolution' are omitted from the US Jewish media part-work.
    [ I can't resist quoting, from the same volume, on Vladimir, who captured territories and 'By the year 1000, [Vladimir's] Kievan Russia was second in area only to the Holy Roman Empire. ... According to the ... account in the [Primary] Chronicle, Vladimir was approached in 986 by representatives of various faiths ... From the south-east came the Khazars, preaching the attractions of Judaism, but when Vladimir asked why the Jews had been expelled from Jerusalem they could only reply, "God was angry at our forefathers, and scattered us among the gentiles on account of our sins". Vladimir ... could see no promise in the faith of a dispersed people...' In addition, Vladimir decided against Islam because he liked wine, and against Roman Catholicism because the German version was unimpressive. But he liked the Byzantine Church and after military exploits and marriage to a Byzantine co-emperor's sister, established his Metropolitan Church, giving it 10% of his revenues. The peasants were less impressed, and continued with ancestor worship, orgies, sorcerors (volkhvi), and with double faith, dvoeverie, despite sword-point baptisms. ]

1967  Enoch Powell's speech at a Conservative Party Club.
    [ May be taken as the start of semi-public debate over the effects of immigration, which began in 1948. Many universities had meetings with synthetic indignation in 'protest' in 1967, no doubt organised by Jews, though nobody said so to non-Jews. Powell never discussed Jews; his comments were therefore worthless. His whole speech is curiously empty. Its harmlessness must have been one reason Jewish media gave it widespread publicity. However the secret Jewish policy to damage white countries by immigration has become progressively better known. Martin Webster was certainly aware of the issue in the 1970s. So were the National Front. Jane Birdwood's piece The Longest Hatred (below) specifically includes a section The Real Reason for Coloured Immigration into Britain. Other of the many Jewish names include Rabinovitch, Sontag, Ignatieff, and the recently-much-publicised-thanks-to-Internet Barbara Spectre. ]

1967 'Six-Day War'. 2017 headline Israel provoked the Six-Day War in 1967, and it was not fighting for survival refers to an interview by Norman Finkelstein, though almost certainly there are better informed commentators. 'Israel was not peacefully minding its own business, but instead regularly and violently provoking its Arab neighbors. ...'

1968  Eustace Mullins's book The Biological Jew is published by 'The International Institute of Jewish Studies'. Eustace Mullins (1923-2010) has a website www.eustacemullins.us which for my taste is not a very well organised site. I recommend The Biological Jew for its detailed comparison of Jews with fully-evolved parasites. Mullins regards Talmudic studies as something like a textbook on parasitic behaviour. He carries this into such details as blood-drinking rituals, sexual perversions, and obsession with excretion. This book is not in the genes/ genetics tradition of many biologists and popularists, such as Richard Dawkins, but is holistic. In fact, it's possible the badly-analysed material on genes, itself controlled by Jews, was an intentional distraction. See the 2013 piece (below) on Parasitism.

1968   1968 has entered the official demonology, as the start of western decline and decay, completely wrongly. The problems of Jewish militarism began decades earlier, certainly with the desire for war against Germany in the 1930s. Jewish-promoted immigration had been scene-set years earlier, in for example the US Hart-Cellar Act, and the UK Act of 1948 which opened Britain to everyone in the 'Commonwealth'! The Vietnam issue—bombing of huge numbers of Vietnamese villages, experimentation with bombs and chemical warfare, were of course played down by the Jewish media. And protests were certainly partly controlled opposition. Jews looked at the bombs as dollar signs, homeless Vietnamese women and children as prostitutes for American troops, and US troops themselves as disposable goyim. It's well worth understanding this as an example of the fiendish inhumanity of so-called 'Jews' and their handling in their media, and the cowardice of their fellow-travellers.

1969   Rose et al. of the "Institute of Race Relations"  Colour and Citizenship  (Worth reading as an example of the Jewish push for alien immigration into Britain. Entirely one-sided presentation, by a funded secretive group with an official-sounding title. Similar policies have been promulgated in the USA, Canada, Australia and New Zealand, and all white countries possibly excepting Russia)

1969  Largely unremarked penetration of the academic world by Jews with their agenda.   (Slightly comparable with Kevin MacDonald's work on Jewish Intellectual and Political Movements in the USA. This extract is taken from Student Power ed. A Cockburn & R Blackburn. Perry Anderson says (in effect) that Jews penetrating Britain were a different type from those in the USA. The book includes foreshadowings of the media-driven 'Holocaust' fraud. Academic Jews in Britain c. 1900-1970 )

Satire (2014)...
Open Borders for Israel
"A great influx of impoverished refugees and asylum seekers, especially from sub-Saharan Africa, will add to Israel's rich cultural tapestry. Time for apartheid Israel to adopt a humane, liberal immigration policy"
1973   'Mari' in TheOccidentalObserver May 27 2016: Nixon won the 1973 war for Israel He airlifted every American tank we had in Europe and gave them to the Israel army. They were never returned. Also thousands of trucks, ambulances and other vehicles were given to the Israel army. Plus Nixon sent American soldiers to fight with the Israel army.

1970   Thomas Whiteside Defoliation on chemical warfare in Vietnam. Effects on people, though occasionally reported, have never been exposed in detail.

1975   Instauration mail-order, roughly monthly, started in USA; published until 2000. The link is my survey of Instauration, now in PDF format online. Interesting stage in Jew revisionism. For my taste, it does not take into account Jewish control over US military, and the resulting disasters and crimes. But much of it is sound.

1975 or 1976   Arthur Butz The Hoax of the Twentieth Century first published, possibly the first detailed English-language work of holocaust revisionism. [This book was put online much later, as Internet developed. One source of many is http://vho.org/aaargh/fran/livres3/HoaxV2.pdf (the 2003 edition). As far as I know, Butz stayed within the holocaust revisionism field, without expanding into other world issues.]

1975   The Nation Wreckers by Sandra Ross Pseudonymous booklet, which may be by Martin Webster, or David McCalden, edited by Richard Lawson, 'is an updated version of a series of articles which first appeared in Britain First between May and August, 1975'. Evidence that the policy of race replacement of whites was known at the time, though of course censored. The interpretation of immigration in this booklet is partly as cheap labour, partly as race-mixing. [ References include: 'Board of Deputies' of 'British Jews' | Lord Fisher (Samuel Fisher) | Greville Janner | Arthur Super | Jewish 'Defence' Committee | Martin Savitt | Jacob Gewirtz | Lottie Green | David Stern | Jack Wolkind | David Tack | 'Zionists of Hashomer Hatzair' | Mapam (IRA supporters) | Solli Marcus | 'Labour Friends of Israel' | 'Poale Zion' | Eli Benson | Stanley Clinton Davis | Marcus Lipton | Ian Mikardo | Maurice Miller | Eric Moonman | Harold Lever ('Harold Wilson's top financial adviser') | Sam Silkin | Renee Short | Paul Rose | 'World Jewish Congress' | AJEX | Jewish Chronicle | Lord Arnold Abraham Goodman ('Harold Wilson's personal lawyer') | Jack Ross | A Lewis | Monty Henig | Roy Lewis | Harry Bidney | 'International Socialists' | 'International Marxist Group' | 'Communist Party' | Bar Kochba Narod | Israel Narodiczky | 'Morning Star' | 'Searchlight' | Reginald Freeson (real name Venitz; became Minister of Housing) | Gerry Gable | Martin Walker | 'Jo Cox' | Maurice Ludmer | Paul Foot | Tony Cliff (real name Ygael Gluckstein) | Neil Kinnock | Eddie Loyden | Lawrence and Wishart (publishers) | Roger O'Hara | Maurice Ludmer | 'Movement against Racism, Anti-Semitism and Xenophobia' | D N Pritt | NCCL (during wartime!) | Lionel S. Rose | Fenner Brockway | 'Liberation' | Plummer (and 1959-1960 fake swastika daubings etc throughout Europe) | Lord Robert Boothby | Bernhard Schlottman (east German agent) | General Agayants ('top KGB official') | Tom Lascelles Iremonger | 'Petition Against Racial Incitement' | 'Yellow Star movement' | Olga Levertoff | Dr F L Brassloff | Dr Natan Lerner | Dr S J Roth | WJC | 'Jews and Human Rights' | Anthony Lester | Institute of Race Relations | Geoffrey Bindman | 'Runnymede Trust' | Race Relations Act | Lord Justice Scarman and Report on Red Lion Square | Roy Jenkins | Edward Short | Ron Hayward 'general secretary of the Labour Party' | 62-Group (violent Jews) | Menachem Begin | Herut | Irgun | Deir Yassin (Arab village massacre) | Sgt Clifford Martin | Sgt Mervyn Paice | George Evnine | Malvyn Benjamin | Ronnie Jacobs | 'Polish-Jewish Ex-Servicemen's Association' | MERAG | 'the ordinary Jewish community' | 'Direct Action Zionist Group | UN Treaties | UN Genocide Convention 1948 | Sussman | Moshe Menuhin. ]

1976  Arthur Koestler  The Thirteenth Tribe First popular account of the Khazar idea, written by Arthur Koestler, a Hungarian Jew, and based on documents and reports of documents in several languages. The information was in fact known many years earlier, but suppressed by the USSR regime. Moreover it was and is common knowledge in the Black Sea area. Koestler's motive in writing this is not known to me; maybe to downplay unpleasant aspects of Jews. [ It's been suggested that Koestler died very soon after publication; in fact he died about seven years later.
      Added 24 Feb 2017: The likelihood that both Christianity and Islam were fake religions invented and inserted by Jews suggests a different interpretation. All three varieties may have been inspected by the Khazar leaders. And they may have decided to follow the masters, not the pupils. Posing as 'Jews' themselves, they may have decided that Judaism was such a successful racket, that they could use their important secure geographical location to copy the Jewish techniques. Or of course their Jew representative might have liked the idea—opening a second branch office over to the east, with access to Asia, which Islam had been unable to penetrate. After a few generations, the Khazars would all believe they were Jews. ]


1978   Robert Conquest's book Kolyma: The Arctic Death Camps published.
      [ This book is sometimes wrongly titled 'Kolyma: The Worst Jewish Soviet Labor Camp'. First popular account known to me of Jewish work and death camps. This of course was, and is, censored by the Jewish media and their subordinates. ]

1979   USA Department of Education Organization Act (started operating on May 4, 1980) worth noting. Administered by the 'Secretary of Education'. Worth studying as another Jewish intrusion into the USA.

1979   Conference on International Terrorism (in Jerusalem) start of another Jewish racket, to use the USA to destroy opponents of Israel in the Middle East and control the USA by Jews, 'police state' fashion.

1980   Ernst Zündel (often written Zundel) writes The West, War, and Islam and mails copies to numerous Islamic leaders and high officials. Note: internal evidence shows there are several versions, presumably from different dates. This was of course pre-Internet and only at the start of home computers. Zundel (as with others in for example France and Sweden) invited Muslims to educate the West and spread Revisionism. I'm uncertain whether Zundel understood that, as with Christianity, Islam was largely invented by Jews and inserted, as with Christianity, as an ideology straddling many countries. This started Jews on an international 40-year-or-so campaign against Zundel.

1980   Jews start or increase violence in France. This article (dated 1995; English translation) gives some details. The modus operandi is more or less the same as in most countries containing Jews, including police collaboration.

1980   Official start of Poland's supposed independent trade union. Solidarity. Part of the Jewish long-term strategy to deal with Poland. [ Officially, only a handful of Jews live in Poland. But ... many more than a handful in Poland's elites were ... equipped with Yiddish names. Mr Jaroslaw Kaczynski (aka Kalkstein) actually was the Solidarnosc leader's (Lech Walesa aka Lejba Kone) adviser at the roundtable conference in Magdalenka Anno 1989, where the faithful communists (many of them enrichers who came to Poland in 1945 from the Soviet Union) agreed with ethnic Polish communists on "the benefit for the nation of keeping things as they are". (From 'Lucy' in the Occidental Observer. Sales of 'kosher kitchens' in Poland provide some clue to actual numbers. Merkel, the ugly Europe-wrecker, is presumably a Jew from Poland.) ] 1981  David Irving  Uprising! One Nation's Nightmare—Hungary 1956  (Interesting well-written account based largely on first-hand accounts of Hungarians attempting to throw off the Jewish grip on their country. Warning: includes some accounts of 'communist' (i.e. Jewish) tortures.)

1984   Remarkable speech by Hartley Shawcross on Hitler, Nuremberg, and the Soviet Union. In Stourbridge March 16th 1984 he supposedly spoke: "Step by step, I have arrived at the conviction that the aims of Communism in Europe are sinister and fatal. At the Nuremberg Trials, I, together with my Russian colleague, condemned Nazi Aggression and Terror. I believe now that Hitler and the German People did not want war. But we declared war on Germany, intent on destroying it, in accordance with our principle of Balance of Power, and we were encouraged by the 'Americans' around Roosevelt. We ignored Hitler's pleading, not to enter into war. Now we are forced to realize that Hitler was right. He offered us the co-operation of Germany: instead, since 1945, we have been facing the immense power of the Soviet Empire. I feel ashamed and humiliated to see that the aims we accused Hitler of, are being relentlessly pursued now, only under a different label."
    [ Shawcross delivered a two-day speech at Nuremberg, intended to persuade (e.g.) BBC listeners that Nuremberg would be conducted in a fully legally correct way. Other of his activities included prosecuting 'Lord Haw-Haw', for treason, and Klaus Fuchs for giving 'atomic secrets' to 'the Russians'. He was President of the Board of Trade under 'Labour' when Churchill displaced them; probably he was a 'useful idiot' hiding Jewish control of British trade. He also took part in Justice, a supposed human rights organisation, apparently from 1957-1972, at the time of US genocide in Vietnam. It certainly seems fair to regard his speech as remarkable. ]

1984   Joseph M. Canfield's first limited publication of The Incredible Scofield and His Book starts to make an impact on the many gullible Americans deceived about Zionism by the 'Scofield Bible'.

1985  First legal trial of Ernst Zündel in Canada. Did Six Million Really Die? and The West, War, and Islam were two of the issues, though the Islamic paper was generally unmentioned. [ May be taken as the starting-point of legal disputes related to Jews as a collectivity. Although this started as a private complaint, the legal system involved itself. Years of convictions and acquittals, investigations, expert witnesses, Canadian constitutional points, international law etc. followed ]

1986  Robert Conquest's book Harvest of Sorrow—one of the first scholarly works on mass killings and forced labour in the USSR.

Eisenhower's death camps
1986 John Doyle Klier's first book Russia Gathers Her Jews, expanded from a PhD dissertation. Regarded as a Catholic academic, Klier nevertheless worked in Hebrew studies and (later) in archives in Russia. One of the few Catholics to comment seriously on Jews, one guesses he must have been an irritant to Jewish handlers. See below, on 'pogrom revisionism'.

1987  First volume of Churchill's War by David Irving. Probably the first serious attack on the fantasy presentations of Churchill as a 'great wartime leader'. Note that East End London had quite large numbers of poor 'Jews' to be bombed after Hitler's retaliation to Churchill. Here's an undated film or video of David Irving explaining how Churchill started bombing German civilians. July 20th, 1940 selected by Irving as a key date: transition from British Empire to Cold War. (DI accepts 'nuclear weapons').

1989 More than 40 years later ...  Saturday Night (a picture magazine; September 1989) published an 8-page article
EISENHOWER'S DEATH CAMPS The Last Dirty Secret of World War II
by James Bacque. (Link to a downloadable PDF, about 840K). Eisenhower circumvented the Geneva Convention by renaming Prisoners of War 'Disarmed Enemy Forces'.

1989  Tiananmen Square demonstrations in Beijing/Peking. Widely lied about; there was no massacre. The connections between Jews and China are as obscure as Jews and Arab countries. Probably something to do with Jews migrating to China, moving assets to China, and/or controlling manufacture with cheap labour and expensive pollution.

1990  "Lautenberg Amendment" to H.R.3743 offered cash and numerous benefits and immigration into the USA to Jews from the the USSR, on a discriminatory basis, presumably part of the planned collapse of the USSR, which soon followed.

1990  BBC Have I Got News for You Fake pseudo-satire news programme; probably small part of the push for war against Iraq. Writers listed as Hislop and Merton, probably both 'Jews'.
8 hours of (((British))) TV 1991 first Iraq war (VHS tape, then mp4)

1991  Attributed to Jane Birdwood The Longest Hatred: An Examination of Anti-Gentilism  (Published by Jane Birdwood. About 25,000 words. The death of Jane Birdwood in 2000 reminded me I had a copy of this booklet, for which she was inconclusively prosecuted in Britain. Its varied and interesting topics include: the nature of money and the 'Bank of England', 'Communism' and the fact the Soviet Union was supplied with technology and equipment, some little-known religious texts including Luther on Jews, race (including Portugal's disastrous race-mixing, Jews and the slave trade, and the Jewish-promoted 'Race Relations Act' in the UK), various types of secrecy (for example, Freemasonry), and the possible causes of wars, for example against Iraq. Its Second World War material mainly examines 'the Holocaust' the political effects of WW1 and WW2 aren't examined—the authors hadn't realised nuclear weapons are a fraud—but deaths of healthy white men are examined)
Jews in Britain celebrating their money-making lies

1991   CCETSW ['Central Council for Education and Training in Social Work' in Britain] Diploma in Social Work guidelines 'set out in detail the new orthodoxy'. The 'self-evident truth' that 'racism is endemic in the values, attitudes and structures of British society.' No dissent ... would be tolerated. Colleges and courses that did not accept it would lose their licence to train social workers. Evidence of doubt was evidence of unsuitability...'

1991  Bilderberger Group starts to enter general discourse in an intermittent way. The names comes from Bilderberg Hotel in Osterbeek, Netherlands, May 1954.
    An early website of the 1990s: Conrad Black brags (or confesses, depending on one's point of view) that "After 1986, I became the co-leader of the Canadian group and effectively chose most of the Canadian participants." Presumably, Agnelli "effectively" chooses the Italian participants, Balsemao the Portuguese, Barnevik the Swedish, Davignon the Belgian, Hoegh the Norwegian, Halberstadt the Dutch, Olechowski the Polish, de Pury the Swiss, Schrempp the German, Seidenfaden the Danish, Sutherland the Irish, Vranitzky the Austrian, Collomb the French, David the Greek, Carvajal Urquijo the Spanish, and Wolfensohn, all those not otherwise included. Selection of US and UK participants is clearly more complicated.
    Another sample: Charler Frey in the OccidentalObserver 2016: ARKANSAS DEMOCRAT published the fact, in June, 1991, that Clinton attended the Bilderberger conclave in Baden-Baden, and flew to Moscow to meet with Vladimir Bakatin, who was pre-occupied with his Russian September election, running as former Minister of the Interior [KGB]. Nothing was ever published about that meeting, and Putin never replied to my query on his personal web-site. Many former Bilderberger-attendees found themselves nominated and elected heads of states or Brussels Commissars. (edited down)

December 1991   U.S.S.R.'s planned collapse, after careful preparation.
    1992     From 1987-92, upwards of a million and a half Jews fled Russia in anticipation of the planned deconstruction of the Soviet Union. ... Extract from Anthony Hargis in redressone.wordpress.com (site started in 2000. Has extracts from the Los Angeles Times). The idea that the USSR collapsed without the CIA having any idea of it, is of course nonsense, and part of the Jewish media blackout surrounding the Jewish coup in Russia.

1992  Publication of Ronald Headland Messages of Murder. A Study of the Reports of the Einsatzgruppen [sic; no umlaut] of the Security Police and the Security Service, 1941-1943. (Endnoted in Irving on Churchill, along with Omer Batov, The Eastern Front, 1941-1945. German Troops and the Barbarisation of Warfare (London, 1985). And Theo J Schulte, The German Army and Nazi Policies in Occupied Russia (Berg, 1989).)
      Headland (if indeed that's a real name) and the title of the 1992 book, connections with Robert Maxwell, plus the obscure publisher Farleigh Dickinson 'the largest private university in New Jersey', suggest, obviously enough, a subsidised push to pretend Jews in the USSR and satellites were innocent, timed with the deconstruction of the U.S.S.R. The drivers of the USSR were Jews; the word 'Communist' of course includes them, but also includes a whole spectrum of collaborators, including 'useful idiots', Masonic and other cryptics, victims in Gulags and prison, media and military employees, and masses of normal people unable to escape.

1993
Ashamed to be white relabelled I is ashamed to be half cast mixed race
 Stephen Lawrence murder enquiry. Dennis Norman, George Erdos, & Ahmed al-Shahi  Racist Murder.. the MacPherson Report  (1999 book describing the strange top-down official anti-white campaign, based around a single murder, in which the normal legal process was suspended, a kangaroo court with more than a score of barristers, no defendants, no jury with Sir William MacPherson assessing the truth. Incredibly, one of three 'working' with a judge was a Jew. The 'Racism industry' in social work in Britain is dated here from 1991. Deliberate, and institutionalised, avoidance of statistical evidence on race and crime; for example the BBC clearly follows agenda—consistently ignoring evidence on crimes by race now, just as it ignored genocide in the USSR, genocide in Vietnam, and now ignores murders of whites in South Africa).

1994  Death of Revilo Pendleton Oliver sometimes called Revilo Oliver Pendleton (1908-1994), who seems to have spent his life as a professor in Illinois, of Greek and Latin, Spanish, and Italian. He founded the John Birch Society, and was partly Jew-aware, in a typical transitional state of awareness of Americans deluged by Jewish propaganda. A book The Jewish Strategy (2002) is online—see below; Oliver missed the era of online publication and must have been unaware of its possibilities. This book states in effect that careful analysis of the Jewish Question is essential, but was unable to provide much of this himself; he was in my view excessively oratorical. As far as I can tell, he had only second-hand information on 'Jewish' scriptures.

1994  Frank Furedi  The New Imperialism: Renewing the Moral Imperative  (Typical airhead book by a hack Hungarian Jew, presumably only there courtesy of the post-war expansion of so-called 'universities'. Obviously there's no serious acknowledgement of the USSR. Neither however is there anything intelligent on the USA and its ramshackle puppet empire)

1994  Kevin MacDonald's A People That Shall Dwell Alone: Judaism as a Group Evolutionary Strategy Examined Jews as a group (as they appear in ancient texts) in an anthropological sense; MacDonald claimed it was the first book of the type, meaning (I think) in English. See also Arthur Kemp, 2001. [A People That Shall Dwell Alone discusses the real or mythical long-term history of Jews, including segregation from, and competition with, goyim; and Jewish eugenics) followed by 1998 Separation and its Discontents: Toward an Evolutionary Theory of Anti-Semitism (on anti-Jewish feelings provoked in host communities, which were then exploited by Jews; and the self-deception of Jews in their writings and behaviour). I have no idea what his MacDonald's sales figures are, but there's no question he's been a great catalyst in the process of Americans becoming Jew-aware, something like a modern Martin Luther figure. But I don't know how he'd feel about that comparison. ]

1995   Barcelona Agreement was something like Europe's version of the USA's 1965 Hart-Cellar Act. In each case, retrospectively, the medium-term aim was to flood white countries with non-whites. (Other names include Euro-Mediterranean Agreement and Barcelona Accord) seems to have included north African countries, Turkey, Palestine and Israel in free access to Europe—though not Israel. At this time, or later, plans were made for 80 million sub-Saharan Africans to come to Europe. This (of course) had not been publicised, and details are not easy to find.

probably 1995   Keystone of the New World Order: The Holocaust Dogma of Judaism by 'a well established female educator', under the nickname of benWeintraub. Chaotic book published by a small publisher which includes 'Holocaust' as a religion, but not the word 'Holocaustianity'. It is nuclear-naive and Christianity-naive. It does not have (e.g.) detailed comparisons of fake deaths, fake monuments, fake writings. But does have Talmudic material, characteristic of minds exclusively concerned with writing and numerals. Slightly like Times crossword puzzle mentality.

from about 1995? Common Purpose established, a pseudo-charity to update the Freemasons (Jews and local businesses) to the modern world (Jews and secret contracts and contacts). Partly exposed in the UK by Brian Gerrish, and others, but without insight into Jews, 'Marxists', and money. Here's an overview of Common Purpose from this site.

1996   John Doyle Klier [1944-2007] has Imperial Russia's Jewish Question, 1855-1881 published. Fifteen years later, in 2011, Russians, Jews and the Pogroms of 1881-82 was published posthumously. Klier was a non-Jewish academic at University College, London (always referred to as UCL). This perhaps marks the start of 'pogrom revisionism', though it seems slightly too early to have spread at the time on Internet.   [Andrew Joyce in the Occidental Observer names Klier, stating 'In modern scholarship, thanks to the work of non-Jews like John Klier, the refugee narrative of the mass movement of Jews from Russia has been declared unsustainable. It's now commonly acknowledged by scholars, but rarely publicized, that the pogroms were fictitious, the oppression non-existent, and the mass migration economically motivated...' Joyce mentions The New Comparative Economic History (2007), in which Leah Platt Boustan contributes a 24-page chapter "Were Jews Political Refugees or Economic Migrants? Assessing the Persecution Theory of Jewish Emigration, 1881–1914." Joyce also names Yaacov Ro'i, Hans Rogger and Michael Aronson as what I'd call revisionists.]

1997-2012   Tony Blair's 'New Labour', Jewish-backed and funded, promotes huge immigration into Britain, under cover of the Official Secrets Act. Here's my attempt to summarise the period 1997-2012 in Britain. There are analogies in every other white country. Here are some relevant picture reminders. Miliband, supposedly the son of Jewish Ralph Miliband, presumably regards himself as a Jew. At the time of writing (mid-2015) Jeremy Corbyn is a challenger for leadership of the 'Labour Party', has a surname on the Jewish surname index at http://www.avotaynu.com; he has fond family memories of Cable Street, and presumably supports the mass murder by Jews in Russia when it was the USSR. Corbyn has said nothing about the Fed, Jewish money, Jewish frauds, and must be assumed to be just another Jewish liar. There is apparent fuss in the Jewish-controlled media and TV with its worthless interviewers and tiny sound-bites; very possibly Corbyn is just controlled opposition, to pretend Corbyn has new, or original, or any, ideas. Corbyn is of course anti-white and says nothing about Jew 'racism'. Note 'red' Ken Livingstone has been a lifelong puppet of Jewish money, pretending to be 'left'; like an old prostitute, he is still tolerated though I'd guess at a minimum wage.
The parasites gather: List of occupations of Cabinet members of Tony Blair's 'Labour' government: all of them are unproductive, positioned to fleece the UK: Prime Minister Tony Blair: lawyer | Deputy Prime Minister John Prescott: waiter, union official | Chancellor of the Exchequer Gordon Brown: television journalist | Foreign Secretary Margaret Beckett: “researcher in industrial policy” for the Labour Party | Home Secretary John Reid: trade union official and “research officer” for the Labour Party | Lord Chancellor Lord Falconer: lawyer | Lord Privy Seal Jack Straw: lawyer | Leader of the House of Lords Baroness Amos: “equality activist”, Chief Executive of the Equal Opportunities Commission | Minister for Women and Equality Ruth Kelly: economics writer, economics analyst | Culture Secretary Tessa Jowell: social worker, public sector manager | Defence Secretary Des Browne: lawyer | Education Secretary Alan Johnson: union official | Secretary of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs David Miliband: political analyst | Health Secretary Patricia Hewitt: civil servant, “equality activist” | International Development Secretary Hilary Benn: union “research officer” | Northern Ireland and Welsh Secretary Peter Hain: anti-apartheid activist, founder of the Anti-Nazi League | Trade and Industry Secretary Alistair Darling: lawyer | Transport Secretary Douglas Alexander: speech-writer, parliamentary researcher | Work and Pensions Secretary John Hutton: law lecturer | Cabinet Office Minister Hilary Armstrong: county councillor, lecturer in “Community and Youth Work”, community worker | Minister without Portfolio and Party Chair Hazel Blears: lawyer | Treasury Chief Secretary Stephen Timms: local government councillor | Chief Whip Jacqui Smith: economics teacher [from Luke O'Farrell]

1997 The Influence of Internet begins. The following is extracted from RadioIslam.org a Swedish-based site established c. 1995, probably by Roger Garaudy (French Muslim convert to revisionism) and Ahmed Rami (Moroccan, who ran a radio station in Sweden from 1987). List (which doesn't include lower staff levels) of Jews in Clinton administration. (updated 1/4/1998): Madeleine Albright (Secretary of State) | Robert Rubin (Secretary of Treasury) | William Cohen (Secretary of Defense) | Dan Glickman (Secretary of Agriculture) | George Tenet (CIA Chief) | Samuel Berger (Head National Security Council) | Evelyn Lieberman (Deputy Chief of Staff) | Stuart Eizenstat (Under Secretary of State) | Charlene Barshefsky (U.S. Trade Representative) | Susan Thomases (Aide to First Lady) | Joel Klein (Assistant Attorney General) | Gene Sperling (National Economic Council) | Ira Magaziner (National Health Care) | Peter Tarnoff (Deputy Secretary of State) | Alice Rivlin (Economic Advisory) | Janet Yellen (Chairwoman, National Economic Council) | Rahm Emanuel (Policy Advisor) | Doug Sosnik (Counsel to President) | Jim Steinberg (Deputy to National Security Chief) | Jay Footlik (Special Liason to the Jewish Community; no other group has a special liason) | Robert Nash (Personal Chief) | Jane Sherburne (President's Lawyer) | Mark Penn (Asia Expert to NEC) | Sandy Kristoff (Health Care Chief) | Robert Boorstin (Communications Aide) | Keith Boykin (Communications Aide) | Jeff Eller (Special Assistant to Clinton) | Tom Epstein (Health Care Adviser) | Judith Feder (National Security Council) | Richard Feinberg (Assistant Secretary Veterans) | Hershel Gober (Food and Drug Administration) | Steve Kessler (White House Counsel) | Ron Klein (Assistant Secretary Education) | Madeleine Kunin (Communications Aide) | David Kusnet (Dept. AIDS Program) | Margaret Hamburg (Dir. Press Conferences) | Many Grunwald (Liason to Jewish Leaders) | Karen Adler (Dir. State Dept. Policy) | Samuel Lewis (National Security Council) | Stanley Ross (National Security Council) | Dan Schifter (Director Peace Corps.) | Eli Segal (Deputy Chief of Staff) | Alan Greenspan (Chairman of Federal Reserve Bank) | Robert Weiner (Drug Policy Coordinator) | Jack Lew (Deputy Director Management and Budget) | James P. Rubin (Under Secretary of State) | David Lipton (Under Secretary of The Treasury) | Lanny P. Breuer (Special Counsel to The President) | Richard Holbrooke (Special Representative to NATO) | Kenneth Apfel (Chief of Social Security) | Joel Klein (Deputy White House Counsel) | Sidney Blumenthal (Special Advisor to First Lady) | David Kessler (Chief of Food & Drug Adininistration) | Seth Waxman (Acting Solicitor General) | Mark Penn (Presidential Pollster) | Dennis Ross (Special Middle East Representative) | Howard Shapiro (General Counsel for the FBI) | Lanny Davis (White House Special Counsel) | Sally Katzen (Secretary of Management and Budget) | Kathleen Koch (Heads FBI Equal Opportunity Office) | John Podesta (Deputy Chief of Staff) | Alan Blinder (Vice Chairman of Federal Reserve) | Janet Yellen (Heads Council of Economic Advisors) | Ron Klain (Chief of Staff for Al Gore)

1997 The Influence of Internet begins: another example. An article explaining the development of the myth about homosexuals and mass murder by Jack Wickoff appears in Comment, a small circulation New York magazine in 1997. It is also available on balder.org on Internet with a much larger readership. The homosexuals-murdered-by-Nazzis lies were of course part of the process of getting alliances for the Holohoax; the point here is that Internet enabled easy access to facts and myths.

1997 Internet Censorship may occur. A possibility which I've not seen discussed is buying-up of host sites. In about 2014, Endurance International Group (founded 1997) bought Bluehost, HostMonster, Hostgator, JustHost, FastDomain and other hosts. Warburg Pincus and GS Capital Partners are reported to have bought EIG for about $1 billion in 2011. The issue involves technicalities, notably whether satellite or cable can carry Internet against hostile interests.

1998  Kevin MacDonald's book The Culture of Critique first published. Note the pun on criticism (as a legitimate exercise in fair appraisal, even if damaging comments are necessary) and the meaning which has developed (adverse comment on everything where it can be made, with no attempt at balance or honesty).  (An evolutionary slant of human activity isn't new; it was in Herbert Spencer, Gustave le Bon's The Crowd (1896), Trotter's Instincts of the Herd in War and Peace (1919), Arthur Keith's New Theory of Human Evolution (1947)—all illustrate more or less Darwinian approaches. E O Wilson's post-war sociobiology books attempt a more quantified approach, and Richard Dawkins popularised interesting points. BUT all these people considered human groups geographically, and simply assumed that nations, or possibly tribes, defined geographically, are the atoms from which human activity is made. Arthur Keith for example thought war was the survival of the fittest nation. The possibilities of hostile groups spread across groups is almost missing. And moreover the power of ideas was largely ignored—studying ant evolution for example isn't much help in studying human ideologies.
    I think it's fair to say Kevin MacDonald's books mark a new epoch, in which the behaviour of a group spread across many other groups is analysed. It doesn't say much for British nationalists that there is no equivalent book relating to Britain; and I'd guess the same is true in France, Italy, and Germany in particular, where post-Second World War influences are overpowering.
    His new edition of The Culture of Critique included a foreword with information taken from The Black Book of Communism. As is typical of the process of revisionism, the more MacDonald investigated, the worse things he found. However, as is also typical of revisionism, he cautiously retained belief in many old topics: the 'Holocaust', science as presented by the Jewish media (e.g. NASA, nukes), the Cold War and atom spies, Jews as in their supposed history; and he treats the diffusion of Jewish beliefs observationally, something that unified people just caused to happen to happen, without linking in the power of paper money. Here are just two forum entries on these subjects—not from MacDonald:–

Jews Suppressed Intra-Species Evolution Ideas.
How Few Jews can Control a Country?

2000   Michael A. Hoffman II self-published his book Judaism's Strange Gods, 'a slender, groundwork study'. In 2008 he published a much longer work, Judaism Discovered, a 'high quality ... hardcover, a massive, nearly indestructible textbook-sized 1102 pages, profusely illustrated, with numerous photographic reproductions from the Talmud and cognate rabbinic texts.' And in 2011 Judaism's Strange Gods: Revised and Expanded Edition intermediate in size between the earlier books. Hoffman has written many other books and articles. As far as I know he takes the Jesus Christ material completely seriously.
    [ Hoffman is Roman Catholic: I pray for the conversion of one brilliant and articulate Orthodox rabbi, completely fluent in Aramaic, Hebrew and Yiddish, learned in the Mishnah, Gemara, Rashi's Chumash, Rambam's Mishneh Torah, Karo's Shulchan Aruch, the Y.D. and O.C., Zohar, etc., and who would be willing to give speeches and write books exposing Judaism from the inside. I would do all I could for such a Christian convert. ]

2001, Sept 11   9/11 Controlled demolition, with precision computer timing, of the 'World Trade Center', a set of obsolete and under-used buildings, Jewish owned and controlled. First use of digital video on Jewish networks, though they seem to have misjudged the speed that amateur/ domestic computer people would catch up. The 'enquiry' by the '9/11 Commission', chaired I think by Kissinger, was published on July 22, 2004. And, amusingly, given 'The National Book Award for Nonfiction'.   [ This has been the start of the awakening of many Americans, both to the lies and confusions of the event (Dancing Israelis? Suspects with two passports allowed to leave? Computer graphics of fake planes? No discussion of thermite and thermate? Insurance scams? Stories of 'mini-nukes'? Jewish TV actors wanting war with Iraq? Sudden promotion of 'Al-Qaeda'? Fake 'missing persons' flyers?) and historical parallels, such as Pearl Harbor, Jewish financial scams, NASA's faked moon and Mars landings, and the simple fact of a huge conspiracy. ]
      Important Note: The theft by Jews of something like a trillion dollars, possibly transferred to Jewish banks, was about this time. 9/11 had the effect of muffling these events and destroying evidence. No doubt this was one of the purposes of the Jewish trash actors lying about Arabs.

2001   Date given for first publication of March of the Titans, Arthur Kemp's history of the white race. Similar attitude to Kevin MacDonald somewhat more than five years earlier: an innovative, though apparently obvious enough, approach to the historical study of a human group.

2001, 2002   Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn published Two Hundred Years Together, in (presumably) Russian. 2001 title translated as something like Russian-Jewish History 1795-1916. 2002 title translated as The Jews in the Soviet Union. Kevin MacDonald writes (20 Feb 2017) there is a project to publish translations on https://twohundredyearstogether.wordpress.com .
    No Jewish publisher has issued a translation of the volume dealing with so-called Jews and mass murder in the USSR. This means not one well-funded publisher in the 'west' has published the book to date.

2002 Revilo Oliver's The Jewish Strategy was published posthumously. (There are extracts in www.heretic.com under R Oliver: Jewish Strategy). After more than a century of censorship, it's likely that rather wild theorising will emerge, and this seems a good example. (There is a lot on Biblical style history (Oliver studied classics) and nothing on Khazars; there is speculative material on takeover of countries by Jews; there is speculative material on history of the last few centuries; and there is biological and genetic speculation. Oliver for example considers that Jews must have genes evolved along the lines of pack animals such as wolves and baboons, acting in similar, but much subtler, ways. I suspect that, whenever censorship is breached, there's a wide diversion of beliefs, which will eventually approach some consensus as some lies are corrected. Meanwhile, odd beliefs flourish in somewhat the manner of heresies as religions fail or monarchies perish or species show new forms after population declines. Another example: the 'Heretical' website attributes the First World War to women's influence and a decline in something like politeness and chivalry, which seems implausible to me).

2002 British Media Control by 'Thomas Sparks' distributed on Internet. An example of the type of information which appears from time to time, and has existed where there was literacy since Jews began their various crimes. A good, more recent, example is the work of Johan Galtung.
      Short, detailed, but unsourced. The piece is not Holohoax-aware; nor does it have information on Jews and books, schools, universities, and the professions. I've added internal links. A good example of information in transition from paper to Internet; the original version has no links and no endnotes and is more national than is accurate or necessary, in a way which Internet is starting to obviate: for example, Europe-wide Jewish control—France? Germany? Sweden? Greece?—could be added to such pieces fairly easily. It is not holocaust-revisionism-aware.

2003 C Cox & J Marks  The 'West', Islam and Islamism: Is ideological Islam compatible with liberal democracy?  (Typical Jewish propaganda, ignoring the true background of 9/11 and Jewish involvement in wars and control of money and oil in the middle east. All the serious issues are ignored. See my review of that book No serious value in understanding the three-way war)

2007  Martin Gilbert (1936-2015)'s Churchill and the Jews: A Lifelong Friendship, author of about 80 books, including editing and/or completion of Randolph Churchill, atlases, edited books, volumes of papers, 'Holocaust' material, no doubt with numerous readers, editors, geographers, publicists, and other contributors. Amid this torrent of trash, it's probably significant that Churchill and the Jews was one of his last books. It is supposed to contain a great deal of collected material on Churchill's policies in support of Jews, and may be worth reading on that account. [thechristiansolution.com]. For what it's worth, here's M Gilbert talking at a book-signing session in Hampstead, London NW3, April 1998. (Unedited).

2008   Seems to be the date by which James Bronson's short story It's a Wonderful Race was published. I found no information on this author. Based on a rather mawkish US WW2 b/w film It's a Wonderful Life, the story presents a world in which whites had never lived, in a convincing and effective way. However, the sub-theme of Jewish deceit and violence throughout the period is attributed only to modern times.

2010 Thilo Sarrazin's book Deutschland schafft sich ab. Not translated into English, as far as I know; the title means Germany is doing away with itself. Sarrazin has financial experience. Big selling author. Here's Sarrazin making a speech in English.

2010 Dambisa Moyo  Dead Aid  (Token black female Goldman Sachs employee type with pitiful writing style—promoted e.g. by the New York Times. There must be a shift in policy here: instead of US taxpayers funding corrupt cliques, or funding weapons profiteers, it seems it's more profitable not to bother. Typical example of hyped book which evades all serious issues. May have some relationship to secret undemocratic European Union plans ('Barcelona Agreement' or 'Barcelona Accord' or 'Barcelona Agreement'?) to move 80 million black Africans to Europe)

2013 Perhaps the fall of the Jewish 100-year USA Reich?

2013 Sayanim and Hasbarat 'Jews' And How They Operate. This is one online page from israpundit.org; but there is a lot of similar information online. It is repulsive reading, but worth understanding.

2015?   Rev Steven Sizer was attacked about this date by Welby, Jewish-origin Archbishop of Canterbury. I believe Sizer was fined £3,000, though the details seem to have vanished from Internet. Sizer's websites make no mention of it, probably because of a 'solemn undertaking' he made: I would like to give you [a bishop] ... a solemn undertaking to refrain from writing or speaking on any theme that relates, directly or indirectly, to the current situation in the Middle East or to its historical backdrop. Probably a warning shot that truth-seeking vicars who wish to keep their incomes should be quiet.

2015 ARD (Arbeitsgemeinschaft der öffentlich-rechtlichen Rundfunkanstalten der Bundesrepublik Deutschland a consortium of public broadcasters in Germany, founded in 1950 in what was then West Germany. The ARD is the world's second largest public broadcaster after the British Broadcasting Corporation, with a budget of €6.3 billion and 23,000 employees. The budget comes primarily from the licence fees).
    Broadcast Ursula Haverbeck in a Panorama TV program. At the time I write this, she appears to be facing arrest. Possibly this is a trial balloon, to show what will happen to dissenters. Or just possibly it was a genuine truth break through.

2015 Joanna Lumley's Trans-Siberian Adventure is a Jewish propaganda piece. Lumley doesn't know, or mention, that 'Russian' oligarchs are Jews. She doesn't of course understand the Jewish fraud of 'Lenin' and his huge mausoleum. Or the vast massacres of Russians. Or Stalin's Jewish threat and the German 'invasion'. Or the vast Jewish atrocities. It's amusing to see her naive comment about the Russians, since the collapse of the USSR, 'embracing capitalism'; of course, Jews did that all along; they controlled the money. Or the control over the media. The mascara'd disgusting old boot understands nothing about the world. I apologise to Russians for her moronic paid lies—sorry. We'll do better, I hope.

2015   Wars for Jews Syria in particular. It's worth noticing, and completely internalising, Jewish attitudes to countries. It seems to be a Jewish genetic characteristic to fix on and demonise groups, like a predator with moving targets.
      [ The obvious example is Germany and Austria, now. The myth of the 'Holocaust' was made up by Jews, partly as a self-reinforcing piece of hate which they pretend to believe was true. Sweden is under attack, by Jewish money and the Jewish Bonnier clan, presumably because they were neutral in the Second World War. Russia was a target before the First World War. Poland for centuries had the misfortune to be 'home' for large numbers of Jews; to this day, many 'Poles' turn out to be Jews, for example Polanski. Merkel is another recent example. Jews from Hungary played a large part in science frauds. Far back in time, Egypt and Persia are believed to have been targets, whether rightly or otherwise. Syria is believed to have been the target of the Maccabees. Rome and Christianity were targets for many centuries. The older mythologies were resurrected by the Khazar conversion—including of course Palestine as a target. England was a target since Edward I's expulsion of Jews in 1290, as distinct from Scotland which seems not to have expelled Jews. Spain and Portugal have elaborate histories with Jews; probably the viciousness of the Spanish Civil War was one remote outcome. Italy, is of interest for its Fascist history; click here for scraps of Jewish links, above. From about September 2015 Europe was targeted by the Jew Merkel for invasion by many blacks: Moroccans, Nigerians, Libyans, Pakistanis, Afghans, Somalis etc and some Syrians. Americans were used as surrogates do destroy some of these countries: it is a similar process to Jewish terror to get Palestinians to leave Palestine, 67 years earlier, combined with forcing invaders into Europe. And note that Turkey was and is a Jewish regime, as has been fairly clear since the Armenian genocide. (The Jewish control is one reason Jews like Cameron claim to want Turkey in the EU). Even Saudi Arabia under the supposed 'House of Saud' is crypto-Jewish. At present (January 2016) the policy seems to be to encourage anti-Muslim feeling, both by finally publicising attacks on women, and also by encouraging Muslims to be aggressive. ]

2016   Another False Flag/ Psyop/ Distraction 'Early Sunday' June 12th: 'LGBT' night club in Orlando, Florida: supposedly 50 deaths. Wednesday night, June 8th: real shooting in Tel Aviv, where a professor, Dr. Feige, who had written two books exposing the settler movement as a failure, was assassinated. [ This would be the last person a dedicated Palestinian resistance fighter would kill in cold blood. Feige's conclusion in his books is, essentially, that the Jewish fundamentalist "Greater Israel" project is doomed to fail. This would not sit well with rabid extremist Zionists. Like Rabin, he was taken out. - wording from abeldanger.com ]

2016   'Whiteness Studies' and The Jewish Origins of the Open Borders Movement. A well-researched article in the online Occidental Observer by Andrew Joyce, October 2. Identifies the following 'Jewish activists' (self-identified as 'Jews') of the Jewish anti-white 'intellectual' movement. Listed here in order of appearance: Noel Ignatiev | Ruth Frankenberg | Ricky Marcuse | Terry Berman | Barbara Applebaum | Say Burgin | George Lipsitz | Michelle Fine | Lois Weis | David Theo Goldberg | Maurice Berger | Lawrence Grossberg | Jennifer Roth-Gordon | Cynthia Levine-Rasky | Laura S. Abrams | Judith Katz | Melissa Steyn | Paula Rothenberg | Amy Eshleman | Dara Silverman | Tim Wise | Jon Greenberg | Debbie Zucker | Robin Nussbaum | Diane Eshelman | Michael Drucker | Catherine David | Lois Weinberger | Eva Hesse | Chantal Ackerman | Elie Wiesel | Steve Cohen | David Landau | Bryan Caplan | Menasseh Ben Israel.

Oct 2016   A news item quoted a 'Rabbi' on Brexit (UK leaving the EU) causing 'anti-semitism' and the likely departure of Jews from Europe within thirty years.
    NOTE: their 'warning' that Jews may be forced to leave Europe in 30 years is probably a coded message. Jews have not generally been forced to leave areas they have polluted: generally they collect their loot, move, then complain to their new parasitisable hosts that they were badly treated.
    In times gone by, and because they previously swung their absurd fictions about 'Yeshua Christ' on the gullible, they often got away with this. The real meaning of the 30-year message is that invader nonwhites now at school will be 35-40 and Europe will be ruined, as Jews obviously want. However, there are problems:
    [1] Information is now more freely available, at least if Internet survives, and hosts will be aware of their activities.
    [2] They do in fact have Birobidjhan as a homeland.
    [3] Their paper currency and e-money may be so worthless they will not be able to carry assets with them, and probably will have to buy up land and property and rely on legalities being honoured.
I suspect they will try to have some area built for them, particularly if Israel and Greater Israel prove unviable. Researchers will find points of comparison with the pulling-down of the USSR, and Jewish invasions into the USA and UK.


2018? Indian Goyim Party seems to have been founded about now, judging by sketchy online sources. It seems partly propelled by arms sales to Pakistan—and also arms sales to India, by, or linked with, Israel. [ Previously, Jewish activities have been covert, and denied and ignored by politicians and historians and others. But we now have potential situations in which territorial Israel may be targeted for war, as other countries have been targeted in the past. And possibly the subordinates to Israel, for example the US-Britain establishment, may get pulled in. ]
Back to Top

Reprise: Some notes towards understanding 'Jews':-
  • Paper money/ e-money as the root of Jewish influence of the last few centuries 'Money' traditionally was something fairly portable, fairly durable, fairly subdivisible, fairly rare, and fairly valuable: metals, thin gold sheets, 'precious' stones, shells, flint. The usual view is that prehistoric societies had not invented money, and that barter necessarily preceded money, assuming there wasn't simple theft or purely local tradition. Money may have been suggested by barter—amber, ermine, copper, traded at the margins of two geographical zones. Any form of money must have social affects, which have to be liked, or tolerated: for example, owners of gold or silver mines had obvious advantages, but also problems, of wealth and security respectively. There would have to be people, and their equipment, technically competent to make, analyse, cast etc gold. And the distribution and physical control of money must have had consequences: counting-houses, secret security locations, etc. And no doubt there were strange consequences: large accumulations of money to some groups, with probable redistributive counter-measures; mercenaries and hired killers; interest payments where time periods were important—large-scale buildings, ships, seasonal food.
        Paper money needs some form of trust, and some form of legal or other enforcement. The usual histories say it was a development from goldmiths issuing promises to pay. Another claimed influence was China. Probably kings, landowners, bishops and generally any prominent person would be tempted to issue such notes; with the possibility of failure to repay—King Charles I was well-known to have failed to pay debts. The Fuggers seem to have been the last people to incur huge losses of real money.
        However, the important point here is that money as a large-scale enterprise has a different feel from small-time, ordinary everyday money. Most people don't realise this; they are not personally involved with big transactions. It's obvious that a company paying 1,000 employees must have what seems like a huge amount to pay out every week or month. A billionaire may only own the equivalent of one street in a capital city. Pensions to an entire country, student loans, taxes from transport look very different considered in aggregate from the individual view. Britain had until the 1960s a money system perhaps reflecting part of this—pennies being used for small transactions, shillings being 12 pence, and pounds being 240 pence, with a guinea adding another 5%. Indian princes used a 'crore'.
        Paper money in its modern form (security printed many special features; and the electronic versions - let's call them 'e-money') is not valueless, as may seem the case; if a government or group can enforce payment, its promises take on a value. This may not last: Russian peasants clutching their roubles after the Jewish coup in 1917, and middle Europeans and African under hyper-inflation, illustrate possible problems. The value is purely a measure of legal strength, itself related to military power.
        Problems with Jewish control of paper money/ e-money occur because most people have no understanding of what happens. For example, borrowing by governments is traditionally at interest. This is understandable when they borrow gold; but with the Fed and 'Bank of England', where the cost of manufacturing money is small, there's a huge revenue which gives the controllers of paper money enormous power, which may be abused. (Suppose a security printer can make $10 notes for 10 cents in bulk. Then 3% of face value of $10 is 3 cents, paid every year. But this is about a third of the true cost of printing them—33% ish return each year. This is why Jewish controllers of paper money love to rack up more and more debt). Another example is illustrated by the chart: M3 is a well-known definition of 'money supply', covering cash and balances and fairly liquid types of 'money'. Varying M3 has subtle effects on entire economies. The figures were deliberately discontinued (as a 'cost cutting' measure; the blue line is a later estimate) by Jews in the USA to make tracking M3 difficult.
        Typical consequences are that Jews, by selectively giving money to other Jews, allow them to take over media, and profitable businesses, in an unstoppable way. They simply have too much financial power. There is therefore a two-tier system of capitalists: most people think of business in the way it would apply to themselves—borrowing from a bank, selling something at more than it cost, and hoping to take a profit. They don't consider printing money, because they can't do it. People conflate 'capitalists' without ever noticing that some are a great deal more equal than others. The same sort of unnoticed consequence applies to e.g. think-tanks, universities, trading in currencies, etc: Jewish cheap money drives out money which has to be earned, and hack writers, hack academics, other currencies can easily be bought. When Soros is reported to be very calm when dealing in money, this is the reason.
        Let me draw parallels with Christian organisations: Roman Catholicism has a tradition of hairsplitting and Jesuitry, not unlike Jewish pilpul, and in neither case has anything much resulted. The Church of England historically was fed entirely by Oxbridge graduates in ancient languages; about half these graduates went into the Church, where they were given 'livings', but did little work. Jewish money-funded media hacks (such as the BBC and general 'newspapers') are equally undistinguished and unoriginal.
  • The Myth of Jewish Creativity arises because of the ability to buy out expertise. The achievements of whites cities, transport, art, music, publishing, science, food, ideas so far outweigh others that they are all but unique. The reputation of Jews, which of course they themselves promote, is entirely mythical. The 'holocaust' fraud illustrates the depths they sink to extract money. Relativity and nuclear frauds, which are slowly becoming known, are just an aspect of junk science promoted as a Jewish contribution to the world. Google, Youtube, MTV, ownership of media, ownership of shopping malls illustrate this pattern; given wholly unequal paper money support of Jews, all they need to is identify a possibility, then hold a 'beauty contest' of experts; others do the real work. Even if it fails, it doesn't matter: profits are grabbed, losses are offloaded. It's notable that the USSR invented absolutely nothing, in spite of being controlled almost to the smallest personal detail by Jews. All the technology was reliant on the west. Even obviously useful things, such as battery chickens or combine harvesters or water purification systems or energy sources not needing huge lengths of cable, were not invented in the USSR. Habitual Jewish lying has led to science fraud: Psychoanalysis, AIDS, the 'moon landing' and other NASA lies, 'nuclear' sciences, climate pseudo-science and many others, all point to the fact that lies have a similar advantage to theft over honest toil. By now, even unsceptical people have doubts about Pulitzer Prizes, Nobel Prizes, medals, degrees, and other ever-more-inflated 'award-winning' junk.
        At an evolutionary level, this makes sense: a group adapted to damage and remove rivals has behaviour patterns analogous to a cuckoo working long and hard to throw out eggs from a nest; its whole life is adapted to that. Jews are good at deception, fraud, manipulation, secret violence, and whole lifetimes of lies: people like Kissinger and the Dimblebys (in Britain) have covered up endless horrors and atrocities and crimes, all their lives, without the slightest sign of strain: it suits them and they're clearly adapted to it. But Jews are not good at creativity or any sort of broad outlook. This is why, despite vast numbers of Jewish professors in American universities, and Jewish writers advertised by Jews, nothing much ever comes from them except wars and conflicts and frauds.
        It's possible the Jewish self-generated reputation will rebound against them: if they're so wonderful at business, then they can do without advantages. If they are chosen by 'G-d', why should they need any help? And it's possible their academic phoniness will become obvious when media control falls.
  • sandwich boardsandwich board
    Sandwich Boards
  • Propaganda: Deformation of Ideals in order to progress what a small group of Jews regard as 'good for Jews', it's obviously necessary for Jews to make alliances, as we've noted. To do this, one component is persuasion, in addition to the economic method and the violence method. My notes on 'joff' sites (i.e. Jew-blind) includes many websites of this type.
        Examples include:
        (1) Biasing of the 'rationalist' movement. Because of the success of science, religions have come under attack. These movements have allied with Jews, but of course criticism of Jews has been almost nil. American 'skeptics' groups illustrate this perfectly; they are happy to criticise Christianity, but there is an absolute taboo on criticism of Judaism, and Jewish frauds. The same is true of Richard Dawkins, who comments on Christianity and Islam, but never mentions the biggest mass murderers per head ever, Jews, or their 'sacred' books.
        (2) Legal systems: the idea of generally-applied fair laws is not part of the Jewish ideology. All the race-based laws for example were pushed by Jews, nearly always (of perhaps always) in a covert way. This of course may backfire—maybe synagogues will be made illegal for promoting race supremacism, for example.
        (3) Company law is now centred on money; there's no reason why it could not be centred on inventions or technical control. In fact, possibly technocrats may emerge as a serious force opposing Jewish-influenced managers; why should people who run computer-based electronic money take orders from Jews? Why should people in weaponry take orders from Jews?
        (4) Alliances with specific political aims; one of the aims being to weaken whites. I'll illustrate here the post-1945 nuclear weapon fraud, and the Vietnam War, and their opponents; I'll take Bertrand Russell as an example familiar to me. Russell sided with the USSR as against Hitler's Germany, probably because this was a British aristocratic tradition. However, he opposed nuclear weapons (know known to be a myth), his efforts being corralled by Ralph Schoenman, Joseph Rotblat, Hyman Levy. He also opposed the Vietnam War, no doubt a money-making scheme for the likes of Kissinger's associates. He was given controlled support by Chomsky, Schoenman, and others. To this day, many ordinary Americans have no idea about atrocities committed on a huge scale in Vietnam, and I think this helps explain some white self-hate and admission of white evil. It certainly doesn't fit with Kevin MacDonald's evolutionary view of whites as generously co-operative and helpful.
        Let me make a point here about Jews and wars. Most non-Jews think of wars as more or less right and proper. I'm saying the Jewish attitude is: if Jews benefit, we support war. It doesn't matter who with, how many non-Jews are killed, how much is costs, whether whole civilisations are ruined. If it works for Jews, yes! This explains the tidal wave of anti-German media stuff from about 1931 against Germans. It explains US media against Vietnam, Iraq, Syria. It explains why the media have so little evidence, and so much anecdote, story, war crimes which are never investigated, yelling and shouting. lies at a high level, and fraud..
        There are innumerable similar cases: the promotion of unwanted immigration. Dumbing-down of education in association with low-grade educators, promoted 'guru' figures who appeared from nowhere with hare-brained schemes, and people with class interests in feeble education for others. Poor quality immigrants in medical work which they have difficulty doing. The lead-up to what became World War 2, Forrestal's murder, Kennedy's murder, the Cuba 'crisis', the 'Liberty', the neo-Cons and Iraq, 9/11...
        (5) Ideas of service, aid, constructive help, charity, community values are of course targeted by Jews. Medical doctors and nurses might be motivated with the wish to cure and help people. Teachers and educators might be motivated by wishing to see an educated, self-aware, and creative population. Lawyers might be motivated by the wish to see a just society, and investigate the implications. Business people might consider good of the community. Military people might consider their work should be used to enforce peace, rather than carry out wars. These are examples where Jewish influence has been malevolent, and characterised by contempt for lives and for civilisation. And some of the attitudes of Jews (in common with e.g. Muslims) operate in favour of these deformations: if someone's motive for studying is to make money though legal scams, or make money through other peoples' medical discoveries, or to get a professorship even if it means faking results, such people may outperform more honest types.
        (6) Internationalism, promoted by H G Wells, Bertrand Russell and others as a way to avoid wars: Wells invented the slogan 'The war which will end war'; Russell thought a world government's sole function should be to prevent wars. The 'New World Order' and European Union retain a bit of this as a slogan or feeling. But if anything they seem predicated on more and more wars, organised mostly by Jewish neocons. In the same way, Africa was thought of by idealists as needing generous-minded civilisation and thoughtful progressive measures. Jewish influence in South Africa is well-known to have been malevolent, but the story of Jews in Uganda, Congo and so on is as yet almost unknown.
        (7) Freedom of Speech. Everyone who's had his or her opinions changed by discussion, or learned new things by reading or from other media, or simply been taught something new to them, knows the power of information. This has been perverted by Jews in several ways to pretend pornography has some connection to free speech, to pretend that systematic media lies are a 'free speech' issue, to pretend deliberate deception on important issues is a matter of free speech.
        (8) The Scientific Method. The traditional view, or view which used to be offered to young people, is that a spirit of free enquiry, rigorous investigation, and healthy criticism was the essence of science. Independent, intelligent observers, paid, would investigate without fear, or favour, and present their results to unbiased critics. This ideal has not, of course, worked out—though it's useful in getting young people to work for others.
        (9) Family issues—Marriage, abortion, women and voting, women and careers, women and education, free love, children—have come under Jewish influence. As far as I know late Victorian women wanting training and education, and the vote, and comparative sexual freedom and equality, believed more or less in what they said. The Jewish versions were anti-white (and anti-black, too); so much so that post-1945 'Womens Liberation' is often believed to be a Jewish movement.
        (10) Propaganda—Jews' extraordinary reliance (after control of money) on publicity seems universal. Advertising, Hollywood, book publishing, newspapers, radio, faked demonstrations and protests, fake think tanks, funded bookshops, funded lawyers, pressure groups and all the rest—as technology improves, so does their grip, so far at least. And it spreads everywhere: hospitals with incompetent unqualified staff, local government neglecting their duty, teachers who can't teach, power companies approaching failure, planners who can't plan, statisticians who conceal truths, anti-family campaigners trying to destroy men and boys, election fraudsters, money fraudsters, university departments funded to lie, medical incompetents to be left unremoved—groups of this type use 'Public Relations' agencies (PR is often said to have been invented by a jew, Bernays), specialist lawyers, liars of all types, concealment of evidence, malicious defamation of whites. The technique is simply to lie: this is less easy now, with Internet, but the whole modern period from the discovery of the Americas has been dominated by Jewish lies. Typical Jewish history textbooks are simply strung-together lies which they like. This seems to be genetic to them; an immediate impulse which cannot be overridden. As I write this (end of May 2015) the 'British' Labour Party after innumerable scandals, including child sex, is pondering: should they get more actors? Look for a new liar? Reword their policies to sound better? Spend more on advertising? Clamp down on critics?—their spontaneous impulse to conceal by emitting lies is central and dominant.
  • Propaganda: Looking at Fully-Established Propaganda, and Derivatives. It's essential to understand the possibilities of implicit assumptions in propaganda. When some aspect of propaganda is part of an establishment, new derived examples can be made up and foisted on people—both the general population, and subgroups. A good example is the demonisation of Germany from about 1900: endless bogus stories appeared in Jewish media, and this is still true today (2015). The subgroup of teachers and professors have almost all gone along with the lies. An historically-important parallel is medieval Catholicism, where some monks spent their time on fake lives of saints, and other propaganda—analogous to Jews at the present day turning out media lies, or NASA 'workers' turning out their fakes. Here are just a few modern subtler examples:
        (1) 'Baby Boom'—many Americans still think there was a 'baby boom' in the USA after 1945. The figures show, especially allowing for war dead, this is questionable. I'd guess the motive was to pretend whites were growing in numbers.
        (2) Capital Punishment had vociferous opponents among Jews. Humanitarian? In fact of course Jews were the largest group of mass murderers per head on earth. The aim seems to have been to make white societies more dangerous. (In the USSR, violent criminals were released onto Russian societies).
        (3) Christian Love is typically used by Jews as a sort of passive/aggressive attack. "G-d loves everyone. Why are you filled with so much hate? A little love or kindness would do you some good"—illustrates the way Jews use this trick. They do not ask themselves if they owe kindness to African migrants, for example.
        (4) Abortion is an issue easily exploited by Jews, with the function of reducing rival race numbers.
        (5) The 'master race' is an example of attributing Jewish propaganda to others. It's a Jewish belief.
        (6) Wealth as Theft. Here's a translation of St Ambrose: " ... what was given to everyone [sc. by 'God'] for the use of all, you have taken for your exclusive use. The earth belongs not to the rich, but to everyone. Thus, far from giving lavishly, you are but paying part of your debt." Spot the omissions, for example technical skills, and the misuse of the word 'given'. This is a parasitical creed, not unlike Jewish beliefs.
        (7) 'Government' may describe cases where people need some sort of even-handed administration. If this word usage is established, it can easily be extended to cases of foreign intervention or violence—a popular trick where Jews more or less secretly control armies.
        (8) BBC, US network TV still seem to have an aura of comfort and familiarity. This allows endless assumptions about world-views to be inserted: Dunkirk spirit, nuclear weapons, Japanese atrocities, support for mass immigration, quality of 'the intelligence community', the Queen as a servant of the public. Many British people still think the BBC at one time had a golden age of reliability; the truth of course it has always lied.
  • Getting Control: Temporary Alliances are an essential part of Jewish operations.
  • It's often said they support both sides: in fact, any side without artificial support of paper money works at a disadvantage, and risks diminution or extinction. For example the British 'Labour' party was nominally founded in support of workers about 1900. These people were farm labourers, builders, factory workers, domestic servants at a time when bank accounts were few, their pay low, and opposition to united labour strong. It was simply not possible to get this assorted mass to donate regularly. So the Labour party was heavily Jewish right from the start; it would not have survived otherwise. 'Sidney Webb', an energetic Jew, illustrates the type; Beatrice Webb the ally. The Liberal Party declined, partly because their ideal of traditional economic liberalism of small producers was outmoded by technology, but presumably also because they had no wish to specially benefit Jews. In modern Britain, and the USA, the media use of 'Left' is almost entirely pro-Jewish—traditional socialism meant some sort of equality and redistribution and justice for inferior races, but 'Left' in the BBC and New York Times sense means redistribution to Jews: 'international socialism' meant Jewish control; but 'national socialism' meant non-Jewish control. This ambiguity was useful for opponents of equality, often traditional groups such as the Monarchy: when Mrs Thatcher was horrified at 'Socialism', she pretended the USSR was 'socialist'.
        Another example where a group spread over multiple countries can display unacceptable power is by local control over military feelings and aggression. Most people almost inevitably absorb attitudes from whatever media are available. Anyone able to influence beliefs in countries with different languages has a huge leverage over both countries. Most Irish believed in the supreme evilness of Cromwell, although the evidence came from just one unreliable witness. Most Russians presumably accepted the idea of the 'Great Patriotic War'; at the time most Britons believed Hitler and Germany were the greatest evil ever, and believed they almost alone crushed the Krauts. Hans Blix said he believed Saddam Hussein Iraq was the cruellest dictator in history. Many people believe the French are cowards, the Germans sinister, the British effete, the Spanish cruel. With this sort of power it is easy to invent and exploit splits; once they start they naturally build up momentum as violence and damage spread. Napoleon must have been just one of a long list to bewail his fate when his support was withdrawn. Britain after the Second World War soon found, once their usefulness was over, that they were expected to pay for their work in supposedly saving the world. And of course by issuing solemn condolences, promoting national days of mourning, issuing medals and other trinkets, censoring the harm done, each side can be kept ignorant of the other sides' views. Many Americans still living are proud of genocide in Vietnam, because the Vietnamese views are censored completely from the Jewish media.
        Another good example of local alliances made by international groups is union action. When it was decided to de-industrialise Britain, union leaders were groomed and funded in for example shipbuilding industries. The chaos they caused, and the mental inertia of the workers, was great enough to prevent any examination of what was being done: most people were told to feel relief that the shipyards would finally close, and the hassle would end.
  • How to study the effects of control of money ... At the start of this piece I've tried to outline some of the ways in which control of money produces its own special psychology, of which most people are completely ignorant. Examples include: inflation as something wanted because it means more printing of more money; wish to control entire countries to extract money from their bank system; generation of scares by control of the media; buying up of real assets with paper, especially if it is likely to be seen as of reduced value; manipulating stock exchange prices, as in the well-known case of Rothschild at the end of the 'Napoleonic' wars; squeezing money supply; controlling raw materials so that the costs incurred are far higher than the value of materials.
        It takes some mental effort to think oneself into the frame of mind of these rather few people. I wouldn't claim to have complete insight; but it must come to seem fairly natural to them, presumably based on what they think of as sacred books. Non-Jews are in the position of people trying to play chess, or bridge, or poker with experts. I'd like to see puzzles in newspapers replacing crosswords and chess problems with real-world equivalent problems. And I think Jews should be specially studied—it's amazing that their tenets are simply unknown to most people, even those professionally dealing with religions. And I'd like to see abstract consideration of sets, and the way numbers of people interact, to produce results abstract to remove natural biases. There have been some attempts to analyse power logically, 'socionomy' rather than sociology, attempting to flesh out the skeletal material of official statistics. But names such as Pitirim Sorokin and Lewis Fry Richardson and Quincy Wright, now seem ancient, and are in any case pre-date computers. It may well be found that Jews (and/or Muslims) per head were the most deadly people who ever lived, so it's predictable they will oppose such studies.
  • Back to Top

  • Re-interpreting history

    Waterstone's 'Bookshop' (Jan 2013, somewhere in Britain)

    I remember a meeting of authors in about 1980: a man pointed out that 75% (or some such figure) of people never go into a bookshop. He seemed to find this puzzling, or a failure of marketing effort. But people might look for books on how to change schools, how to handle law cases, how to get a council house, what the EU is, whether lawyers are honest, what their granddad fought for, where oil money goes... In practice they are unlikely to find anything very helpful. No wonder they don't bother.
    Holohoax books
    British alien politicians
    Second World War bookshop with no serious historians
    junk bookshop stock Above left   Holohoax rubbish. No revisionists or intellectuals

    Above   Godawful British political hacks: Bercow, Blair, Brown, Mandelson, Hain: Jews, Scots, garbage

    Above right   Collection of tired trash junk books pretending the British were heroic in the Second World War. No serious historians

    Left   Trash including the 'official' biography of paedophile abuser Savile. (Official?) And Jonathan Miller, typical hack of Jewish mutual support system

    Right   Marr, BBC hack (left is Hattersley, almost forgotten useful idiot who promoted immigration into the midlands. I remember him for saying something like: "The Labour Party is about EQUALITY. As for [name], who the hell is he?")



    Andrew Marr BBC hack who favours state stamping on beliefs except his own
Back to Top



Freemasons


Jew and Freemason link—Neville Nagler letter on Freemson lodge in Alaska
Monty Python joke? Ridiculous obsolete symbolism? MQ Freemasons magazine of the 'United Grand Lodge on England' prints a letter from Neville Nagler (see Birdwood's Longest Hatred). Nagler is pleased that Freemasonry is 'universal'. There is of course no discussion of the activities of this secret organisation. Nor are there legal obligations to disclose their activities.

VOMIT ('Victims of Masonic Ill-Treatment') Freemasonry site grabbed in August 2000 is here; this was not my site, and I make no claims as to its truth. However, there appear to be some parts which vanished from Internet; in the interests of historical accuracy, here it is once again.
And here is a fairly new detailed site on British Freemasonsexternal site with information on judges and others.

Back to Top

Satirical Cover Designs (in the style of Private Eye—but more serious)

One of Thatcher's functions was to get public assets into private (i.e. Jewish) hands: the Jewish paper money monopoly means, sooner or later, there is nobody else who can buy these things up.

.. the quite extraordinary number of privatisation troughs that N M Rothschild has got its snout into: British Telecom, Britoil, British Gas, Royal Ordnance, British Airways, Rolls Royce, British Airports Authority, British Petroleum, British steel, water, regional electricity, Northern Ireland electricity... British coal.. the list goes on and on. .. the chancellor, Norman Lamont, and the economic secretary, Anthony Nelson both used to [work for] N M Rothschild. This was Private Eye in April 1993, John Major as Prime Minister, four years before the equal disaster of Tony Blair, who followed with yet more sell-offs


Star of David (manufactured symbol) formed from swastikas.  Based on a 1970s Palestinian design.

Based on a 1970s Palestinian or Egyptian design.

Swastika and 'Star of David' were both interpreted negatively.


Many people haven't understood the close association of modern profitable industrial militarism with brainless 'soldiers'.


Comment on British political parties: the main ones are now all funded and led by Jews.


The long-running 'Holocaust' fraud appears to be coming to some sort of 'head', as the unpleasant but appropriate phrase goes. One of the persons here was responsible for helping draft an anti-white 'race relations act' (though he of course did nothing comparable for Israel). Another when Home Secretary secretly, without any democratic mandate, arranged for Britain to be flooded with immigration. For the prostitute reference, check the position in Israel.


Comment on 'Jewish' women. Susan Sontag considered genocide of whites obviously desirable. Barbara Spectre became famous after an Israeli TV programme featured her insane ramblings. Many Jewish women seem to love paedophilia and child sex (it's part of the 'religious' texts of Judaism).


Although no critics of education seem willing to follow this hypothesis, it is likely that the deliberate dumbing-down of British education was driven by Jews. Check, for example, the 'look say' method of teaching reading/writing, which rendered whole generations less literate than their parents; and the moves against grammar schools, while all the political 'elite' send their offspring to expensive public schools. The American prolonged attacks on free education for whites, and the recent 'Common Core' farce points the same way. {Note: 6 Feb 2015 Juggernaut3000 in occidentalobserver.net wrote: '... Common Core standards were written by a Jew, BTW, named David Coleman. It's purpose is to further dumb down America and pass off anti-White marxist ideals as fact and dogma in all subjects, including math.']


The newest Archbishop of Canterbury (appointed by the Jewish Prime Minister Cameron, from a shortlist) has recent Jewish ancestry. My prediction is that the church will be completely ruined as a result. It might have had some sort of serious intellectual purpose. Note the comment on the absurd 'gay marriage' idea.


The so-called 'Holocaust' fraud needs a longer, standalone, article. Click for a Long 1997 article on the 'Holocaust' myth with updates fifteen years later.
And here's the same talk as an audio file, to be listened to. Talk on the 'Holocaust' (1997)
[ Top of Page: Truths about Judaism ]

Back to Top

Cans of Worms: Discovering the True Past. How Historical Revisionism Progresses

Specifically Jewish Revisionisms:   1 David Bryant

This is a link to David Bryant's piece on Jewish corruption of the USA, Europe, and Russia since about 1914-- David Bryant on Jews

David Bryant ('The Birdman') put together and discovered many historical events; but, inevitably, a lot has escaped him—life is short. Read him and notice among other things...
• Bryant hasn't understood that Jewish influence pre-dates 1914; he has little on the US Civil War, Jews and the Atlantic slave trade, and Jews and the French Revolution.
• Bryant thinks nuclear weapons were genuine, and that Jewish 'atom spies' sent genuine secrets to the U.S.S.R. Part of this site shows reasonably conclusively that nuclear weapons were a fraud, and the 'atom spies' were, too.
• Bryant assumes the Korean War and Vietnam War had genuine military purposes; is this true? Maybe they were simply to make money for Jews.
• Bryant assumes Nobel Prizes prove Jewish creativity, despite the warning fact that these 'prizes' are heavily promoted in the Jewish media. In fact, many of them are for phoney work. (Perhaps I should update this word, since telephones have been technologically outpaced by digital transmissions. How about 'didgy' as a new version of 'phoney'?)

However, Bryant was one of the few to work on the probable murder of James Forrestal, Secretary of the US Navy, by Jews.

Specifically Jewish Revisionisms:   2 Intermittent Progress from about 1945 to about 2000

Briefly, let's look in date order at:
1970 Bertrand Russell's death
1974 Did Six Million Really Die? - Richard Verrall
1978 Treason at Westminster - Kitty Little
1984 World Coup d'État Planned - Kitty Little
1987 Spycatcher - Peter Wright
1991 The Longest Hatred - Jane Birdwood
1993 Mammon vs God - Kitty Little
What I'm looking for here is the realisation that Jews backed by fiat money power gained control of many countries and manipulated them, in what they thought were their own ends.
Bertrand Russell opposed British and, later, American intervention in the First World War. However, he never doubted that the Second World War was admirable and just. He later opposed nuclear weapons, having no idea of their likely Jewish fraudulence. He had no idea Cuba may have been a marrano Jewish construct, nor did he see any connection between JFK's murder and Jews. He came to oppose what he saw as American war crimes, notably in Vietnam, which were covered up by Jewish interests: he considered the USA was building up a world empire. He became part of the Jewish process of pretending racial differences aren't significant, though I doubt he had much grasp of that policy.
Richard Verrall (perhaps with other author(s) took on the 'Holocaust' myth, which had been put in place by Jewish media in the thirty years since 1945. He also perceived the link with immigration into white countries and anti-white and anti-national views.
Kitty Little's Treason at Westminster I think supported the Second World War on what she thought were patriotic grounds. However, she thought the Soviet Union was trying to build a world empire: she was not aware of specifically Jewish plans, for example in Africa. She has details on reducing of British power, by the Labour Party, by damage to industry, finance, military strength, and so on, and assorted laws and agreements, including weakening treason legislation, but with no specific Jewish background information. She noted the use of deliberate immigration as a ploy to damage Britain, and the related anti-white propaganda. Her work is based on Britain (though much the same might have been said of many countries). She is aware of fifth column activity, but doesn't have a theory of what should be done where a hostile elite or layer pursues policies opposite to the general population. She had a science background, and was something of a whistleblower, for example against 'the pill', and diesel engines, but had no insight into nuclear matters.
Kitty Little's World Coup d'État contains Christian materials. She discusses 'Communism' with little emphasis on its Jewishness. She extends into the UNO, and the European Community, which she notes correctly is a Soviet-style undemocratic construction.
Peter Wright's Spycatcher shows an honest but slightly naive man, fully believing in the justice of the Second World \War, but puzzling over links with the USSR; he believed the Cold War was as presented in the Jewish media, and was baffled at the links with the 'Russians'. In retrospect most of the big frauds were helped by supposed 'defecting spies' with sensational stories: atom spies, Cuban missile spies, up to Vanunu. There's an account of Roger Hollis, the head of MI5, laughing as Wright explained laboriously what evidence he had for Hollis' leaks.
Lady Birdwood in The Longest Hatred pieced together Jewish fiat money, including the 'Federal reserve', and included material on coloured immigration. She included the Talmud, Freemasons, and wars, notably Iraq. She still mentions Churchill positively, but recognises the 'Holocaust' as a fraud, fortified by Fred Leuchter, and names Jews in Britain as behind race laws and other manipulations. She doesn't mention depressions, strangling of money supplies, buying up profitable businesses, and war profits, or at least not very clearly. She even included Jewish mal-education. However she was not much good on science frauds.
Kitty Little's Mammon vs God follows Birdwood in identifying usury (not I think defined as e.g. practised by Jewish central banks) and the New World Order as a secret policy. Note that H G Wells wanted world government; but not run by a clique of Jews. Kitty Little is more nationalistic, though she liked the British Commonwealth and its co-operation. She has a very Christian outlook and goes so far as to take Biblical accounts of races as genuine history. She notices the use of 'war crimes' as a pretext - i.e. something that only opponents of Jews are accused of, though she doesn't extend this back to Vietnam, or further back to Korea, or to the Second World War. And she notices the use of law to damage whites and benefit immigrants; and the equivalent internationally, using deceit, psychological operations, and what are often called 'false flags'. She notes the Jewish attacks on Christianity.
    This is just a very brief survey of just a few sources, but they help show that disentangling truth in the teeth of propaganda and violence is not a simple process.

Revisionist Processes: 1 New Information and Ideas

Obviously, revisionism needs new information. Let's take some examples: NASA's moon fraud goes back many years; peoples' awakening has been variable, and of course there are people—pop musicians, journalists etc—who haven't woken up; ditto the 'Holocaust', ditto blacks and Jews. It's obvious that attitudes to science, to Jews, to politicians, will change; and blacks' attitudes to whites as opposed to Jewish slave-owners in the past, will change. Another example is nuclear weapons considered as a fraud; this is the newest topic known to me, post-dating even 9/11 revisionism. As with a detective story, new information leads to new guesses. For example, covert murders by Jews will be much more likely to be explored in future.

Revisionist Processes: 2 Back Through Time

Along with the expansion of ideas in the present, thoughtful people will look back. The entire disaster of the 20th century is a start, but people will look at (for example) the 19th century—the US Civil War, for example, the Opium Wars. And earlier—Cromwell, and events after the Civil War, which probably have parallels with BBC and other propaganda in Britain after the Second World War, providing useful reference points for comparison; and the Reformation which must have parallels with revisionist awakenings now, for example discovery of frauds (the 'Donation of Constantine' and the 'Holocaust', as examples). In fact the whole of history is up for intellectual grabs: Spain and the Inquisition—is it true that Jews regard Muslims as a large dim population, and are happy to live exploiting them?
    China offers possibilities for serious revisionist work extending back over millennia. Consider for example-
  • 'Ethnic Chinese' in the far east: could there be some evolution along the lines of Jews, evolving as a parasitic group?
  • China appears to have had paper (or silk) money in parallel with cash. Is this related to literacy, and the development of a legal stratum of officials?
  • China has, or had, or may have had, literary works of great antiquity. Have these had influence down to the present day?
  • Has their system had the effect of choking off inventiveness?
  • Have there been one of more dynasties which were overthrown as a result of some system of credit, debt, obligation, or other arrangement which needed legal and/or physical enforcement?
  • Was the competitive exam system rigged?
  • Is there evidence of secret groups having been concealed, as Jews and Freemasons have been kept secret?

Revisionist Processes: 3 New Schools of Thought

New schools of revisionism are emerging. Examples:
  • The revisionist Michael Hoffman II takes a Roman Catholic view; for example, he is disgusted by Jewish film-makers vulgarism and their lies about Germans; but he has a French Catholic view of Vietnam, and doesn't worry about American atrocities there. He's interested in textual research, and reprinted in facsimile form The Traditions of the Jews, published in 1748, English language excerpts translated from Johann Andreas Eisenmenger's two-volume Entdecktes Judenthum (Traditions of the Jews).
  • Spanish revisionists have views on Jews and Muslims, who co-existed during the period of Muslim invasions and conversions; and have their own opinions on the Spanish Civil War; it may be that ETA is a fake, used as a cover for assassinations, as the IRA is possibly a Jewish front for attacks against non-Jews in Britain.
  • German revisionists—probably semi-secretly—must take views on the devastation of Germany, and eastern Europe, and the importation of Turks.
  • Swedes will pay attention to the presentation of the crazed Barbara Specter.
  • Americans will have to consider whether war with Japan was inevitable, when they fully realise Pearl Harbor was a phoney. Further back, they will no doubt reconsider the Fed, the US Civil War/ War Between the States, slavery, and Independence.
  • Russians will perhaps carry out serious investigations into Jews in their country, and their massacres. Fomenko's views, in numerous books, might be called hyper-revisionism. Another approach, made easier by Internet, is research of the sort possibly pioneered by Miles Mathis: here for example is his claim that Lenin was in fact part of the nobility in Russia, presumably in the same manner that Jews infiltrated the British aristocracy.
  • There are religious divides: the world-leading historian David Irving dislikes the idea that Jesus never existed.
  • Investigations of science frauds are in their infancy, and of course the whole of science fraud lends itself to deliberate dumbing-down in education and the media.
  • Probably new styles of economics, and sociology of science, taking into account these lessons, will develop.
  • If censorship continues, it's possible countries will pull ahead unexpectedly, in the way Britain did after the Reformation.

Revisionist Processes: 4 Deep Revisionism

My own hope is that new approaches to problems of human groups, power structures, and sets of groups intersecting with others, but bearing in mind the limitations of human beings, will lead to new discoveries, possibly appearing simple, in retrospect; in the way that Newton, Malthus, and Wallace (not Darwin!) produced powerful elegant overview theories. Possibly, for example, someone can show that large groups of people cannot be stable, because small groups inevitably communicate amongst themselves and become de facto conspiracies; or that there are undiscovered laws about information, secrecy and societies; or that high productivity inevitably causes energetic people to take up crime, to fill in the time.
    As an example, consider democracy and political parties. Viewed from a revisionist point of view, these seem ideally adapted to generate and exploit divisions—a divide-and-weaken strategy. It's possible that the movement for parties (note the etymology: parts!) was Jewish-prompted, and that 18th-century democrats, and increasingly 19th- and 20th-century, was aimed at weakening nations. The 'Labour' Party, invented more-or-less in 1900, illustrates this. Similarly, the undemocratic control of the financial part of companies, corporations, cartels, customs unions and so on may illustrate a different part of the same process.

Revisionist Processes: 5 Routes to Revisionism (added 24 June 2014)

Just a few notes on the growth of revisionism about Jews, as information about them grows and deepens. I hope a body of work will develop, explaining what Jews have done in the last few centuries, and what, if anything, can be done to correct it.

Before we start, a dash of cold water: here's a short video made in mid-2014 in the north of England; out of 15 or so people, though many had heard the idea of a fake propagandist 'Holocaust', none could state the 'Holocaust' was a fake:–

Vox pop have you heard the idea of fake holocaust
"Have you heard the idea the 'Holocaust' was a Fake?


Routes to Revisionism include:
Personal experiences, notably of war. These include descriptions as for example Noam Chomsky and the Spanish Civil War, which happened in his youth. Chomsky took the Jewish side and is not a revisionist, but many people exposed to the media go through something similar, perhaps of the Second World War, or of supposed nuclear tests, or of Afghanistan, Iraq, and so on. Descriptions are not of course the real thing, but they often have the feel of the real thing. Because Jewish media, overwhelmingly dominant, never reports these things accurately, all revisionists have to return to the topic from an alternative source. When this happens the new information is often rejected. But sometimes it is accepted, the more so with increasing exposure to more material. Truths about Eisenhower, Churchill, the Normandy Landings, the USSR, Auschwitz, Hitler and so on are slowly having their effects.
      And personal involvement. The European concentration camps are a popular example—large numbers of people claim to have been there first, and there are many people exposed to wars in Vietnam, Africa, Iraq, Afghanistan. Because the money and power side is hidden, many such people have little idea of what was happening at the time. However they may be able to piece together more accurate views given time; quite a number of important revisionists came by this route.
Expertise such as that of Fred Leuchter, the gas chamber expert who demolished the fraud of 'Gas chambers'. Photographic and film expertise has been a route for many. Large numbers of people are competent in digital movie media and special effects, and the earlier film media, and this has been important in exposing 'Holocaust' fakes, 'Moon Landing' and 'Space Station' other NASA fakes. After these false-flag fake atrocities were looked at, including of course 9/11, which had its own complement of architects and other experts.
9/11 came at just the right time for home computer analysis, and exchange of information both publically (websites) and privately (emails) led to a huge explosion of interest and a lot of work, which definitely disproves the Jewish version.
Paper money and the Federal Reserve have been discussed since 1913, not usually very successfully. However the more recent depression, with the drop in official figures for M3, and the observation of many people that money was tighter, has focussed attention on Jewish money and frauds more closely than before.
Talmudic and Islamic information influences many people. Translations of Jewish 'holy' books are online, with commentaries and search boxes. Much of this material is genuinely shocking, and often unexpected. It has been available since the 1930s, but ignored by all churches; the suppression of such information by churches is likely to weaken churches worldwide.
      Some aspects of Talmudic and Islamic 'holy books' will be compared with political events, and it will be obvious that these influences are part of the cause. Pornography, sex with children, and rape of unaccompanied women are an example. Opposition to Christian symbols and holidays, however trivial, and intrusion of alien festivals and symbols, will be noticed even by people reluctant at first to admit the influence.
      Other documents, notably the Protocols of Zion and Frankfurt School, will explain deliberate and secret damage to whites by Jews: for example, fluoridation, use of whites in wars, unwanted immigrants and selective money for immigrants, education policies unlikely to work correctly, telling of lies under 'religious' cover (Kol Nidre, Taqqiya. Kol Nidre has been described thus: All Jews renew an oath every year to not tell the truth about anything they choose to lie about.—attributed to John Kaminski). And lucrative science frauds will I hope be identified where they are Jewish-backed: AIDS, climate change, nuclear issues, biology issues. So will insistent propaganda themes of Jews: movies and printed media to promote wars; and control of heights of the legal system; and statistical evasions, such as not recording race in crimes, and not conducting a census.
Chains of Events will form in peoples' minds as they throw off Jewish lies, and incorporate what are (to them) new truths. Here are some examples:-
      First World War. The chain of events casts a very different light on the 'Great War' from the usual stories: 1912, sinking of the Titanic (deaths of opponents of the Federal Reserve Jewish plan); 1913, Jewish Federal Reserve in the USA set up; 1914, First World War declared over time by numerous powers; 1916-1917, Balfour Declaration to get US into war, US media switch to war propaganda, US Jews given control of US economy, and Jewish coup in Russia forming huge Jewish slave state; CFR (Council on Foreign Relations) formed as Jewish pressure group.
      British 'Labour Party'. I recently concluded the 'Labour' party, so-called, was a Jewish invention, an idea new to me. The 'Manhood Suffrage' Act of 1884 seems to have been drafted to allow immigrant Jews the vote, despite their having no connection with the country. Between 1903-1905 immigration of endless impoverished Jews was finally stopped (Winston Churchill filibustered to delay this). Jewish 'money' must have been part of the process: British labour was too scattered for dues to be collected. In 1917, the Jew Sidney Webb drafted 'Clause 4' which (see above) only mentioned wages, and not the super-rich, or the money system This must of course have been intentional. 'Labour' developed an anti-German set of policies, and did nothing to make the BBC honest. And so on up to the present day—supporting very many wars—where 'Labour' is theoretically led by a half-caste Jew, Miliband. 'Labour' uses thugs to silence critics, is involved in electoral fraud, and even imported millions of aliens to boost their votes!
      After the Second World War—a period presented as confused, with a powerful USSR, new nuclear weapons, communists in Europe, Cuba, the JFK murder, and so on. However the Jewish thread clears up many misunderstandings: Jews desperately wanted the USSR not to be inspected (while receiving equipment from the USA). The Jewish 'elite' mass killings notably in the USSR, and links between them and British and USA Jews explain why they wanted this, and how it was done. 'Nuclear weapons' appear to have been a fabrication, with Jewish fake 'atom spies' pretending to transfer technology. 'Communists' in Europe were of course Jewish-run groups. JFK was murdered to keep the Fed fraud going. And so on.

Revisionist Processes: 6 Comparative Revisionism (added 28 July 2015)

People in Britain have underestimated France's problems, for example with an estimated 15 million Muslims. For which I apologise. As far as I know, Napoleon, funded by Jews, grabbed what he could throughout Europe. This led to two types of French people - fellow-travellers who were enriched, and everyone else who wasn't. So native French prosperity dropped, just as native Britons did after Cromwell. Jewish control of money led to empires, which were described as 'French' and 'British' but were Jew-promoted, and violent when it came to Jewish greed; consider Vietnam, for example. Both Jew-promoted World Wars damaged France. David Irving's promotion for his new book in 2015 says, as a surprising shock item, that France was the second-most bombed country (presumably in Europe). The Algerian War story must have a Jewish element which has been suppressed. I don't suppose there's a French version of the 'Empire Windrush' event, since there must have been influxes all the time. We need, not only revisionism, but 'comparative revisionism' to collate all the Jewish frauds and hostilities.
      The story of France is just one example. The important point to grasp is that it may take decades, or centuries, to understand a people. Many breakthroughs in understanding have been painfully slow: energy in engineering, components of food, causes of disease, for example. Intentional misinformation by Jews has slowed the process. But it's not unreasonable to suppose that experts will come to understand Jewish malice and harm, just as there is widespread expertise on engines, vitamins, and bacteria. And many non-experts will come to understand Jews, too.

Revisionist Processes: 7 Final Triumph of Revisionism (added 21 Nov 2014)

This is what is to be expected:
      More knowledge islands will emerge and be made firm
As the ideas of malign Jewish influence spread, truthful people will look for, and find, Jewish influence in their own lives and experiences.
      Common threads will appear, and will be made firm
Comparisons with other people and groups, including international evidence, will lead to reliable evidence on multifarious Jewish activities.
      Hierarchy of information about Jewish methods will be established
It will become clearer how Jews operate. Very diverse fields—schooling, political parties, advertising, genocides in remote areas, corruption of governments, prostitution, weapons, charities, fake think tanks, body parts, family law, secrets and concealment, religions, multinational organisations, poisons in everyday life, real and bogus scientific research, farming and food—will be compared, and discoveries made how Jews operate, and how their policies were originated (i.e. how do they determine 'What is good for Jews'? Not as simple as they seem to imagine!)
      Financial roots will be identified and made clear
The underlying use made by Jews of paper and e-money will be quantified.
      Simplifications and slogans and numerical approximations will be established, plus more detailed theory and more accurate history
The techniques of identifying groups and setting them against each other, so that both are weakened, and also Jews benefit, will be simplified, so phrases and proverbs will be understood by everyone. People will discover rules-of-thumb on (for example) the costs of Jewish money control, and the offloading of costs of wars for Jews. Better reckoning will be made of deaths due to Jews and the true costs of their frauds. These discoveries will be applied to the past, and truer history will emerge, giving an infinitely more reliable picture of the present day and likely future.
      World-wide clashes and reform will take place, incidentally revealing Jewish character
As the necessary reforms clarify, Jewish reaction will be provoked. My personal guess is that Jewish behaviour is, by now, genetic: they will inevitably lie and deceive to the bitter end, in the same way that locusts will always act in groups.

      When the processes typical of Jews will be understood by sufficient people, practical steps will be made to counter them.
Merkel expression
Dimbleby expression
Jewish activities have been on genetic auto-pilot. The 20th century alone shows smallish secretive groups of Jews who (i) Control money supply and laws relating to money; (ii) Control legal systems where possible, with the aim for example of passing little-debated amendments when time for scrutiny is short; (iii) Control information via media control, for example to give false impressions of countries targeted by Jews, to spread false information about the EU and crime figures, and so on; (iv) Using 'Jewish' money to buy control of front-men in any group where joint decisions are made: unions, political parties, lenders and their policies, military groups, teachers, journalists, local housing groups, archival and historical groups, buyers and sellers of anything which can be selectively moved towards Jews; (v) Causing depressions, booms and busts etc; (vi) Aiming for and causing wars; (vii) 'Control' also includes the use of blackmail, menaces, hired thugs, murderers and so on. Some of these things appeal to Jews as being directly 'good for Jews'; others are indirect, such as supporting wars so Jewish interests make money, and, at the present time, universal Jewish support for alien immigration into white countries. (Many people still do not understand this Jewish policy—it's inconceivable to them).
      Here's the problem: Direct me to original research by Jews condemning the Fed, condemning Jewish mass murders in the USSR, condemning the Holohoax fraud, condemning Kissinger's mass murders, condemning Jews in Palestine, condemning Jews and the slave trade, condemning Jewish media lies on black violence, condemning the Jewish 'holy books' etc. If there are so many decent Jews you'll have no difficulty finding plenty of examples. Will you??
      Practical steps depend on unpyramiding some aspects of Jewish activity, for example the cumulative malign laws attributable to Jews, and media influences of Jews; reversing others—a good example being moneys paid to Jews under the fraud of the 'Holocaust', which will have to be reversed with interest and opportunity costs taken into account; punishing other events, a good example being 9/11; revising and improving education; removing malign persons from police and intelligence groups; trying to assess the harm done by frontmen and frontwomen taking orders from Jews; attempting to compensate genuine victims, such as Ukrainians and Russians and Vietnamese; and taking steps to revive native gene pools. How this will happen I wouldn't like to speculate further, though many of the procedures have in fact been applied by Jews and could be applied in reaction back to them. Maybe there will be one-at-a-time loud and devastating attacks on Jewish policies, the most damaging first; or simultaneous attacks on many fronts; or radical attacks on the entire construct of 'Jews'.


Top
Main Website Home Page

Endnote by Mary Thomas

A comment (November, 2012) from the Occidental Observer. (Mary Thomas may not be his/her actual name; I don't know). She talks of the USA, but it could be any once-white country: France, Britain, Sweden, Canada, Germany, Australia, ...

White Americans fought their German brothers during the world wars, and then GAVE the Jews a country of their own, and to thank us they give us the genocide of the white race. The evil I'm talking about here, the betrayal of the good will of decent whites here in America who NEVER MEANT ANY HARM WHATSOEVER TO THE JEWS—the evil is beyond my imagination. As we head into the cannibal's pot, you can BET that we're going to take the Jews down with us. Trust me, when whites figure out what has happened, there is going to be hell to pay. The irony is that we loved and admired the Jews.

I can't imagine that ANY of our major problems could have gained any traction whatsoever if not for Jewish influence. Abortion, feminism, porn, affirmative action, massive immigration—you can rattle off the things that are tearing us down and behind each and every one of those issues you will find malevolent Jewish interests. But it takes a bit of intelligence and research to be able to put it together in your mind. I had NEVER had anything but admiration for Jews my entire life. At one time I had totally accepted that the Jews WERE a superior group and that they DESERVED to be the new mandarin class. I was a liberal for most of my adult life. Then came the bailouts of 08, and I started digging and reading, and I was shaken to the core when I realized that the entire thieving elite was above the law. I sincerely wish that I did not know the things I know now, because the information causes me great emotional pain. But it is what it is, and the truth cannot be denied.

Back to Top of This Page

He who's convinced against his will
Is of the same opinion still—Alexander Pope


Scanning, HTML, image processing, writing where mentioned Rae West. Birdwood first uploaded 2000-07-04. Britton, Freedman, H G Wells 2000-07-28. Lloyd George 2000-07-30. Russell 2000-07-31. Belloc 2000-08-5. Muggeridge 2000-08-06. Olgin 2000-09-09. Nuclear material and post-WW2 anti-white racist material 2012-05. Elton's Reformation paperback 2012-12. Updated 2013-01-11 and later with TheBritishResistance articles, some of which have been added to on occasion. Bryant ('birdman') example of revisionism added here 2013-01-29. London's East End as a target added 2013-02-14.

Attempt to summarise Jewish influence 2012-10-20; latest version 2013-02-07; pre-1880s and NWO 2013-05-01. Titanic and Oliver 2013-04-21. Nesta Webster 2013-05-04. Hungary and Bela Kun added 2013-08-10. Hitler's Mein Kampf notes first added 2013-10-21. Series on academic subjects and learning about Jews completed 2014-01-29. Social science Jewish exam paper 2014-03-16. Eustace Mullins linked in 2014-05-30. LBJ note added 2014-09-22
Jadar sites table main index 2012-12-13; moved here and purged 2013-02-27; 2013-07 new sites added; separated off 2014-02-09
Old Freemasonry site (not mine; grabbed in 2000) re-uploaded here 2013-02-28. Kitty Little booklets 2014-03-12; included in Jewish revisionism notes 2014-03-12. Notes on Jewish opposition to unification of opponents e.g. 19/Apr/2014
Private Eye cover spoofs 2013-03-18. Some navigation for Jewish influence and 'puzzles' section 24/July/2014. Edited for Google mobile-friendly approval 2015-06-19. New articles put at the start 2015-11-25. Mathis research sites list 2016-07-26; George Fox 2016-08-06. First mention of Yeshua Latinised as 'Jesus' being a Jew forgery inserted into Christianity 2016-09-18
Material added in the hope of clarification and amplification intermittently in 2015.

Writing, HTML © Rae West at the various dates listed. This version (three separate files, to save space: 1 Jews in history and the emergence of revisionism; 2 Miscellaneous articles; and 3 'Guide to the Politically Perplexed') first uploaded together 2016-Feb-07. A few tweaks for mobile phones e.g. 2016-10-23